Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
get to 160
then declare and give the bowlers 30 minutes before lunch
we aren’t going to win with the bowlers in the pavilion
Uncovered pitch, Deadly Underwood, job done!
wether we have to bat again or not is a tad irrelevant - granted we can apply pressure with attacking field positions with runs on the board
but 10 wickets is the only way to victory
thought it would be more T20 mode
20 mins to lunch
so obviously no declaration before lunch
imo this is now valuable bowling time
new ball moving a touch
yesterday it all looked flat - apart from about 2 deliveries that kept low
When back in bat, if things start to go south for them, see how many new bats and gloves they suddenly need.
The issue will be factors like checking an appeal via 3rd official, physio on for ball hitting helmet etc - Even no balls - All that never happened on this morning session - But the 3rd official would need to way up such factors - Even 3/4/5 wickets in a session as that would account for lack of deliveries - Even the batting team trying to slow it down if it suits them - So a 3rd official would have to be given a guide line to work with regarding various factors that you can't blame the bowling team for
However, then you need to decide what the punishment would be - I don't think it can be 'lack of overs' then to be bowled after 6.30 as often conditions/weather/light might not allow for it - It has to be runs added to the score board for lack of deliveries - To be accounted for after each of the 3 sessions - 1 run for lack of each over not bowled is not enough - 6 runs for each over not bowled is probably a good starting point
Isn't Test match cricket boring.