Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Oh.
From what I've read, that conviction was very dodgy.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/honours-list/11922112/Geoffrey-Boycott-must-be-knighted-after-new-evidence-points-to-his-innocence-over-domestic-abuse-case.html
With regards the assault court case only 2 people know what happened at the time 25 years ago. He maintains his innocence but he was convicted. This should not detract from his devotion or services to English cricket in my opinion. Congratulations Sir Geoffrey.
"I think they've probably suited Australia more than us," he said. "I would have liked to have seen a bit more grass but that's the nature of the game here. When you're selling out - like Lancashire selling out five days of Test cricket - it's hard not to produce a flat deck but, you know, that's one of the frustrations from a player's point of view. We go to Australia and get pitches that suit them. They come over here and get pitches that suit them. It doesn't seem quite right."
Jim, what pitch would suit England's batsmen? We can't score heavily on green seamers at Lords, we collapsed at Headingley, and we couldn't draw on what you're describing as a Old Trafford flat track.
And I thought footie managers moaning about referees were tedious...
Yes it's nonsense. The Aussie bowlers got the ball swinging and seaming at pace until the ball went off but still managed to get wickets therafter. England got it seaming and swinging just the same but were less effective when the ball went off and the not as good 2nd tier seamers took over.
Fucking terrible monosyllabic commentator on the radio as well.
Mitchell Marsh in for Travis Head
England drop Roy & Overton for Woakes & Sam Curran. Ben Stokes won't be able to bowl in the last test.
I have to say HFD, I did chuckle when I saw MM is coming in for the next test. Great prediction.
It's an attacking move to get the extra bowling option in there. Head's a decent player but hasn't scored a huge amount of runs so the extra bowling option is worth it on the grounds that Marsh might score some runs. If it turns you have two spin options in Labuschagne and Lyon. I think they'll play the big three seamers (Hazlewood, Starc, and Cummins) as Marsh gives some other options.
Australia's strength is in the bowling. May as well play to that.
David Warner, Marcus Harris, Marnus Labuschagne, Steve Smith, Mitch Marsh, Matthew Wade, Tim Paine (c, wk), Pat Cummins, Peter Siddle, Mitch Starc, Nathan Lyon, Josh Hazlewood
Of the 12 selected, Siddle would be my 12th man.
I really hope Somerset cross the line. They've been the bridesmaids for far too long, a few close runs but never get over the line.
I've not had a chance to see Tom Abell, what do you think of him HFD? Any chance of playing test cricket at no.3? There's little chance of it happening but in the test team England need to address the issue of another opener and a genuine no.3, so Root can drop back to 4, Stokes at 5 and so on.
Denley's not an opener. He managed to score a few runs in the middle order so he gets shifted to being an opener to allow Jason Roy to bat in the middle order.
He never looked comfortable as an opener as he's not one!
How the fuck can the selectors not see this issue when every one else can?