Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Looking forward to today's play - if goes ahead.
Im a Kent fan and he’s just scored a brilliant hundred against us and we included Wes Agar and Arshdeep Singh so the idea he’s not a top batsman just isn’t right.
I know what SRV would do with such an issue
i didn’t agree with the declaration but given the weather it looks a good decision.
whatever happens, the crowd have been thoroughly entertained, except the poor buggers who suffers the rain on day 3
https://sixstringsupplies.co.uk/
Our YouTube Channel for handy "How-To" Wiring Tutorials
Ali for starters and who comes in
Stokes as the 5th bowler
Wood for Ali might be an option at Lords
If Stokes can't bowl, but bats only and they want a 5th bowler, then Brooks might have to step down to bring in another bowler
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
Credit to both sides - you could see Cummins and Broad still chatting with all to play for - Great sportsmanship and spirit
Khawaja batted all 5 days - When did that last happen
There will be plenty of if's, buts and maybes, Bairstow? Anderson not at his best, Moeen's finger, Stokes injury... but it's done, time to look ahead and on to Lords...
https://www.lords.org/mcc/the-laws-of-cricket
Australia play with fire and passion, fiercely proud to represent their country.
Going to be a great series, I think.
1: England's bizarre failure to play a wicketkeeper. As we saw, a real keeper would have been worth three or four wickets in not-dropped catches and not-missed stumpings. In that alone you have the difference between an England loss by 2 wickets and a comfortable England victory by 150 runs.
2: The horrendous triple failure by Australia's best batsmen: Smith, all things considered the best year-in, year-out batsman in world cricket today, currently ranked #2 internationally, and a noted performer in the UK: 22 in two innings. Labuschagne, the form player this year, ICC World Ranking #1: 13 in two digs. Head, an in-form player averaging close to 50 and ranked as the world#3: just barely OK at 66 for two knocks. (Count Warner as well if you like, but Warner has never been much good in England and is long past his best. It is a mystery to me why Australia picked him to open ahead of the very talented and reliable Matt Renshaw.) A decent performance from any of those three batsmen (rated the #1, #2, and #3 in the world today) would have put the match result beyond doubt.
3: England's failure to provide a decent test match pitch with a bit in it for the bowlers.
None of those three failures is likely to be repeated. The first test, in other words, isn't likely to provide much of a guide to the rest of the series. England will (surely) pick a wicketkeeper. Smith and/or Labuschagne and/or Head will score some serious runs. Jimmy Anderson will cause some carnage. There will be a result, probably after lunch on the 4th day. There will be some great cricket. Roll on the Ashes!
But this peculiar first test just completed, despite those bizarre failures and even because of them, has been an absolute corker, one of the best tests ever played. We have seen heroics from Root and Cummins, excellent test performances from Khawaja and Broad, a good effort from Bairstow with the bat (if not the gloves), not to mention Lyon's ever-reliable bowling. Inspiring leadership from Stokes and Cummins, a daring (and I believe justified) declaration, excitement and nail-biting drama on all five days, all from a match played in good spirit (Robinson aside) before good crowds. It went right down to the wire and I could not go to bed until it was over.
I seldom pay much attention to cricket these days, but the Ashes is special. Screw last week's cameo with India, this is the real World Championship of cricket. Long may these close Ashes contests endure.
Ultimately the winner is test match cricket - It can survive as an entertainment spectacle - It will be harder to survive with long drawn out draws and no obvious winner after 2/3 days and the draw as on odds on favourites after 2/3 days
I liked the spirit that Stokes and Cummins showed at the end of the game with almost a 'can't wait for Lords' and 'me to' as the reply
There is obvious an equilibrium balance of runs on the board and time required to bowl them out - If we had, and 'if' is the key word, spent another hour chasing another 50 runs at the end of day 1 and even early the start of day 2 - then Stokes would have had to declare early at the end of the 2nd innings, especially as now rain affected - To a) set a realistic target and b) time available to capture 10 wickets - If the potential run chase was to much the Aussies would have shut up shop straight away and accepted the draw - The net result would still be a 280 ish run chase under bazball rules
Credit to the Aussies as most of their 2nd innings they were chasing 3 an over and often falling behind that - And until Cummins hit Root for 14 in one over, they never looked likely to win
The big difference in the end was our lack of bowling options - Stokes is not fit to bowl, certainly as he wishes to - Ali injured - Anderson didn't get the ball to talk and Robinson was just okay - So really Broad the only effective bowler - the Aussies have a better balanced team and bowling options
The fact that we had to look at bringing Ali back shows the issue we've had for many years now and that is no good spinning option - As a spinner Ali is really only as effective as Bairstow is behind the stumps - Both adequate but rarely match winners
Maybe we've got away with it for a while, especially when the going is good - But our team balance is not ideal - No quality spinner, an all rounder that struggles to bowl effectively, a keeper who is primary a batsman - based on last summers performance then Bairstow walks back into the team as a batsman, but who for - Brooks walks into the side based on his winter performance - You could argue that Bairstow opens and bats only, but surely that is as 'dangerous, as him batting and keeper - ie a stop gap - If Stokes only bats, then someone has to drop out to allow this and bring in say Curran in that 'all rounder' role - So not an ideal scenario, especially with no proven spinner at the level we need
But forget all about that - Great entertainment - TMS said they had record levels of log in listeners via phones/lap tops etc - BBC hi light show had good viewing figures - bazball won't always work with regards to victories - But it will often bring in entertainment and full houses - the Hollies looked liked they loved it
Failing to break a 9th wicket stand that put on ?50? runs on the last day seems to me to be the bigger problem.