Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
These people are reviewing it in real time and via replay and are still getting it completely wrong.
I think an effort to right the wrong should be made some how because they brought this system in specifically to stop this from happening. This current method is wrong and it needs getting rid of in that case.
Cup games used to have replays all the time, even finals.
I don't really bother with the Emperor's New Clothes of the Premier League any more but I thought I'd see what the fuss was about with the Jota red (and an injury time Liverpool OG will never not be funny). Regardless of the first yellow, once it happens hes an absolute halfwit for lunging in like that a few seconds later.
The tech is fine, but the people they employ are idiots, I seem to be able to do a better job from my living room than they can in 1/4 of the time.
Before VAR existed, every single week on the TV there were refereeing decisions that would be replayed eight hundred times in slow motion from four hundred different angles and players, managers, pundits, and supporters couldn't ever agree on what the correct decision should have been. Transpose that to a VAR bunker and suddenly everyone's clutching pearls in surprise.
Football refereeing is too varied and far too subjective to get every single decision "right". Its why VAR was doomed to failure before it even started. Kill it with fire and give fans their game back please.
Whilst we accept mistakes on the field as they happen in real-time, we are less forgiving when someone watching the replay get it wrong and with good justification too. We can't go back to without VAR now, the cat is out of the bag and because they to correct more on field mistakes than not since humans will make mistakes. What we expect though are there should be zero mistakes...but realistically, that won't happen, however, it seems it is happening every week and the percentage is a lot higher than it should be, on decisions that shouldn't be, especially on offside decisions. These are not like handball where there is an element of subjective element. Offside decisions are black and white.
Even some discretion on var about opinions - ie was it hand ball or was it a red card etc - but when offside can be drawn down to your big toe was offside with such tight margins, and you effectively have no time limit to get the correct result, with multiple cameras and re-runs of the situation , then no excuses to get it wrong
Titles, European qualification or relegation can hang on such errors- no option for a new game or reinstate the goal - just get it right
100 agree with @RaymondLin comment above
why not make it where the players feet are planted? You then have a straight point of reference instead of oh his left shoulder is offside / onside. It confuses an already confused rule.
Maybe in the back of his mind he was thinking about last season and how Liverpool benefitted nicely from VAR.
Bandcamp
They are still years away from anywhere. Such a poorly run club, I blame the Glazers, it's basically since they took over.
Ebay mark7777_1
Firstly they know that any decision they make can be referred to VAR and over-turned - so the on-field team aren't really "in control" of the game as they used to be, they're there to go to the monitor and do as told by VAR.
Which also means that, even if only subconsciously, they know that they don't have to get those decisions right, because VAR will (allegedly) correct any errors.
Ironic that the linesman got raised his flag immediately (and got it wrong) whereas they generally get berated for only raising their flag 30secs later when the situation was far more clearcut.
However, even though it would be non-zero, I expect the number to be much smaller than it is now, especially when it comes to offsides where the rule is black and white.
In terms of red cards, I think they should show the on field referee EVERY angle of the foul as it happened in both real time and slow mo. Not cherry pick the worst angle and 1 shot and 1 speed. So the ref has all the information. Cherry picking is your evidence is too biased and not good for anyone.
I don't know what the solution is, but sacking him is not the solution.
yet in truth that shows how fickle we can all be - board, fans, press etc
Apparently, the VAR people didn't see the linesman's flag going up, he didn't see Dias stop celebrating, VAR thought the goal was given, hence "Check complete"
If they weren't watching the game....what the heck were they watching?
And perhaps they should stop using ambiguous terms like "Check Complete", and use the term what they are thinking.