Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Saudi Pro League has 'changed transfer market' - Manchester City boss Pep Guardiola - BBC Sport
Ebay mark7777_1
Marching on Together, You'll never walk alone, Forever blowing bubbles, When the saints etc etc etc will never sound as good there as it will here
I dare say next year some teams like Arsenal, Man City, Newcastle who are owned/sponsored by such M Eastern owners/companies will be playing more pre-season games there for big money and sponsorship deals - But as in golf, winning an LIV match means nothing compared to winning the Masters etc
Yes it has money but it doesn't have the credibility, heritage or indeed class - And for every 30/35 year old player that goes there, European teams will have no shortage of teenagers breaking through into their own ranks and becoming stars accordingly - Funnily enough it might speed up the process and offer more chances if the old gets move on for the money
Then it's money versus career ambitions... I can't imagine playing in Saudi Arabia will help anyone's international career. And although I doubt these younger players expect to finish their careers in Saudi, it remains to be seen whether they'll be able to successfully come back into the European Leagues.
A few years later it all went tits-up. The American public weren't interested in sufficient numbers.
This is slightly different in that the Saudis aren't buying foreign stars to bring on their domestic game. It's just like the expensive bling-encrusted stuff Harrods sell, nobody who buys it cares that it might get lost or break or be stolen or not have a sell-on value.
I hope it collapses but I fear that it may be the ruination of the game.
Jordan Henderson, proud defender of LGBT rights.
Now playing in Saudi.
What really gets on my tits though is that I keep hearing pundits on the TV and radio (on the Saudi thing) saying "yeah, I can understand players going because but this will set up their family for life". What!?!?!? Are you trying to say that they aren't already set up for life with the astronomical wages of the Prem anyway???? These people are so detached from reality.
I have no interest in that micky mouse league whoever they sign.
We have bought an insane amount of average or underperforming players in the past decade.
For lots of people, their lifestyle "evolves" to match their income. I doubt that (m)any PL footballers drive a car like yours or mine, or live in a house like yours or mine, take holidays like you or I, buy clothes like yours or mine (etc, etc).
They also have a much longer retirement period to cover.
Hence the argument about the money meaning they can maintain their lifestyle.
But it reminds me of the old joke ...
Woman-to-man: "No funny stuff, just one night, £5m ..... yes".
Man-to-woman: "How about the same deal, but for £5?"
Woman-to-man: "£5??? No way!. What sort of woman do you think I am!!"
Man-to-woman: "We established what sort of woman you are, we're just discussing the price".
and before that, the UK England.
This video explains the economics of the difference. (It’s mostly because of the wages)
https://youtu.be/IpubwBElZtk
Secondly, a player who is 20yrs old is easier to mould into the way ETH wants to play in his way, rather than a ready made star and then build a team around him. United has tried that many times, getting big players and it has not worked once since Fergie left.
Clearly ETH has a way that United should play, he is trying to play a system, buy players to fit that system, rather than just buy the best players.
I know the counter argument is that good players can adapt to any system. I disagree with that, I don’t think putting Messi into a team like the old Graham Taylor Watford side who just hoof ball up top would work if you ask Messi to be guy up top, or in a team where they do a lot of crossing from the wide (not cut backs from edge of penalty area). The team needs to play in certain ways to get the best of the players.
or you get players that fits your system.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/jul/28/oscar-chinese-super-league-saudi-boom-era
The Premier League has been dishing out obscene wages and hilariously over priced transfer fees for decades and a whole succession of pundits were absolutely delighted to bang on about how marvelous it was that middling English teams were dishing out millions every week.
Now some even more insane people have come along with even more insanely deep pockets and there's tears and snotters everywhere.
I'm not desperately happy about Saudi sportswashing but there's an element of "live by the sword, die by the sword" about the whole thing that I must confess to enjoying.
Many years ago, before he got really big I was saying that Man U should sign Kane. They missed the bus!
Mbappe no chance. Saudi have just bid £250+million which is more than all the Man U transfer budget.
Hojlund fits the ETH far better. Coachable potential, physical and dynamic. In budget.
A gamble but fits in with the team rebuild, younger hungry players, rather than buying superstars with their egos. (Not that you would get that with Kane, in a footballing only sense of course he would be perfect).
Right now, whilst I don't disagree that he will score goals anywhere, the reality is he will never go to United. Not with Levy in charge of transfers in Spurs. The only way United can sign him is next year if Kane stays there and play out his contract. That is only if Bayen's interests come to nothing or Kane eyes Shearer's record.
If his 1st priority is winning trophies then he needs to go to Bayen, he will most likely win the league there, perhaps with another domestic cup and get a good run in the CL.
I bet James Maddison knows too..
is it crazy how saying sentences backwards creates backwards sentences saying how crazy it is?
He should stay here for another year and go somewhere on a free where he will actually gain the respect he deserves and have a shot at actually winning the highest prizes. Somewhere like Real, or go to a club that needs a striker of his calibre like Man Utd who I think could challenge properly in a season or so.
In West Ham news we have signed no one. Antonio and Scammaca want to leave so now we only have Ings up front, and Cresswell wants out. We're being ripped off over average players like James Ward Prowse and McTominay because everyone knows we got a lot for Rice, and there's a power struggle in the club between Noble, our new Technical Director and Moyes over transfers.
The club is in a right mess.
Personally, I value trophies more. Give me a Champion's League winner's medal, in any team, over any kind of stats.
Kane already has the respect he deserves, i am not sure what you mean by "actually gain the respect he deserves", it sounds like people don't respect him? I don't think anyone disrespects him in any capacity at all.
RM btw is not interested in Kane, they have their eyes on Mbappe, however that unfolds, who is 6 years younger than Kane.
Also, there is no guarantee that going to Man U will get any tropies, at least Shearer was already a PL winner when he went to Newcastle, Kane has won diddly squat, besides respect.