Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
This isn't looking good so far.
Joe Denly should be allowed a wry raise of the eyebrows too. If Crawley fails for the rest of the series, where do we go next? Ed Smith knows all about scoring some runs on debut and then being ditched quickly. Dan Lawrence isn't a number three and it's asking a hell of a lot for the like of James Bracey to come in on the back of no FC cricket and make a debut at 3.
Interesting stat here: In 65 Tests Ben Stokes averages 37 with the bat and has 9 centuries.
In 14 games that he's played with Denly in the side, he averages 49.78 and has three centuries. That includes an Ashes series at home and going to South Africa, never an easy series.
Perhaps that notion that Denly did blunt attacks without scoring heavily isn't so daft after all.
Interesting read from Dobell on cricinfo about Butler. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/29468548/stubborn-ed-smith-staking-reputation-jos-buttler-test-career
I'd stick with Butler, not many international keepers average more than him in test cricket and if he can get his test average up to 35-37 I would settle with that for a no.7. Dobell references his dropped catch in the first test (Blackwood) which probably could have seen England win had it been taken, but that was his first dropped catch in 2 years.
It has been interesting reading a lot of comments about the top 3 (with Denly included) about how bloodey boring it is with 3 chocolate bat players. Personally I would rather have one aggressive opener, one defensive, and a defensive no.3 (or 2 out of the top 3 being defensive players, one of whom can score at a SR of over 50.
Enjoying Sibley though, Proper test batting that.
Hopefully Sibley can get a "daddy" 100 hundred tomorrow (though that would probably mean batting or another 80 overs) but I can see Stokes, Buttler (I hope), Curran and Woakes knocing the score on a bit.
https://sixstringsupplies.co.uk/
Our YouTube Channel for handy "How-To" Wiring Tutorials
Buttler is an interesting one. Tim Paine's not regarded as a great bat but he averages a teeny bit more than Buttler. Shane Dowrich for the West Indies averages slightly less but has three centuries under his belt in 32 Tests whilst Buttler has one. Quinton De Kock is well ahead on JB in terms of average and centuries as is BJ Watling. Wriddhiman Saha has a slightly lower average but three Test centuries and is well ahead of JB in terms of glovework. Pakistan's Rizwan averages more but has only played six Tests. So around the world, I'd actually say that there are plenty of keepers who have a) contributed more with the bat at vital times (remember Dowrich in the 1st Test for instance) and are better with the gloves.
With batsmen, it appears we have moved with the elevation of the like of Sibley, Pope, and Crawley to start picking players who know how to bat for long periods of time. How does Buttler fit into that? When you see how similar his Test and first-class average is and compare that to how he's risen in the one-day game, then it's not hard to figure that he's got some failings at the red ball game. He's different to Bairstow in that YJB has shown he can play well at first class level but I feel both have simply gotten too much into the one-day mindset and the technique for the longer form of the game has fallen by the wayside in the case of the latter and never developed in the former. You look at how they've been out as a pointer for technique failings. YJB got bowled a lot. Over 2018-19, he was bowled 13 times in 39 innings (Root bowled 22 times in 170 innings by way of comparison). Buttler is most often caught (42 times in 75 innings).
Buttler has so much talent but he's not been used right in Test cricket at any point to my mind.
I'm quite happy for three defensive players in the top three slot because we have a 4 to lower middle order who can really go for it and take on a tiring attack.
Turning pitch in the 1st Test bowling in the final innings, did nowt.
21 overs at Old Trafford on a pitch giving considerable assistance in second innings of the game. Dismissed one tailender as nightwatchman. Looks like he'll get a bowl today on a 5th day turner. Already seen the oppo spinner get wickets this series.
Quite a bit of pressure on him to deliver, I'd say.
85 overs to bowl the Windies out, with a rain break a possibility. I don't think they can get 312 (no Greenidge!).
25 for 3 - Will be an interesting afternoon and 5 Live Sports Extra is keeping me entertained
Broady shows why people saying he isn't a first team choice are idiots.
Bess bowled OK without ever looking to be on top of the batsmen. Personally I don't think he's done enough to warrant keeping him as lead spinner but he's clearly in favour at the minute. The stats are pretty clear who should be bowling though.
JL at home: 5 Tests, 20 wickets at 28, SR of 52.3
DB at home: 4 Tests, 8 wickets at 41, SR of 72.6
Stokes: astounding. Part of me still vomits when commentators talk about his sixes because some of them are more about bat construction rather than outright skill. What is truly amazing about Stokes is how he puts everything into everything. His chase and dive off his own bowling today really sums him up. Brilliant performance.
Shamarh Brooks: that's two of the best 50s you'll see anywhere on a difficult pitch. Fancy he''ll get snapped up for some County Championship games quite soon.
The deciding test should be very interesting, and there are selection headaches with the bowlers.
As for Ben Stokes, he can play a bit, can't he.
Sibley
Burns
Crawley
Root
Stokes
Pope
Buttler (last orders at the final chance saloon)
Curran
Archer
Broad
Leach
If Archer is not eligible to play then I'd select Ollie Robinson but they'll go Woakes.
Sibley lbw b Roach 0. Horribly lbw.
1-1 after one over.
However the media seem to be lapping it up today, England are in a good position yes, but it is all too easy (especially for England) to be 300 all out.
https://sixstringsupplies.co.uk/
Our YouTube Channel for handy "How-To" Wiring Tutorials
I wouldn't be surprised if we failed to make 350, but a morning session of those two could be interesting.
Oh dear.
'leave' balls.
Broad like the rest of the best always ask questions of the batter. As a batsman I always feel a good leave is a win against a bowler. The leave helps you get your eye in, see the shape of the delivery through the air, get a sense of the pace of the wicket and its wasted effort for the bowler. I think once archer consistently asks questions of the batsmen, and two stock balls, combined with his bouncer, slower and raw pace at the stumps he'll be one of the best bowlers in the world. Just hope the abuse he's getting from the mistake he made doesn't ruin him. What a prospect.