Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
So yeah, they do say it even when they don't know. In the above cases, the cynical amongst us might've thought it's because the police use GSDs, so it's less of a PR hassle if the first stories in the press (ie the ones getting the most attention) don't prompt calls for GSDs to be banned.
The simpler the law, the better.
All of my preconceptions about the type of person who'd want to own one of these dogs were pretty much validated I'm afraid. It was like watching vegetable soup being stirred.
I can’t imagine them having specific patrols looking out for these dogs .
Plus some sort of license/test and even then you’ve still got to enforce it .
Imagine a big no go estate ,someone reports a dog , the owners hide it away in someone else’s gaff til the heat dies off . There’s kids out causing all sorts of trouble that can’t be controlled now we’ve got dogs too
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67015811
I'm just perplexed as to why someone would choose to own a breed with a poor reputation and such deliberately aggressive looks.
In the case of the Bidens' dog...that poor dog has been thrust into an environment where he's clearly stressed, and for his own good should've been removed at the first sign of it, not the 11th. That's poor ownership, effectively setting him up to fail constantly.
Just ban and euthanize all these killer dog breeds.there isn't a 'needn't have one that outweighs innocent peoples right tongo about their daily busy safely. Its not that different to banning hand guns.