Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I agree they all have a great spec and there are some stunning looking instruments.
but even the R9 in your pic has the less-than spot-on neck join/tenon visible:
Feedback
In all seriousness I think @hyperben is right here, it's all down to what you bond with. Personally I played most of the stock in the south of the country. There were some absolutely sensational guitars, a couple that weren't as good as I would have hoped, with the vast majority being superb custom shop instruments.
One thing I noticed was that they consistently had accurate neck angles, which is a big issue for many Gibsons.
After all that I ended up with an R9 and R8, both Lemon (I would have preferred different finishes but in the end I stuck with the ones that played and sounded the best).
The neck tenon thing is a bit of an odd one. I was concerned about it at first, but once I knew it was only cosmetic I gave up thinking about it. At the end of the day I've gigged that R9 and it sounds ridiculous and is probably the easiest playing les paul I've ever picked up. I'd have hated to miss out on all the fun I've had with it just because of that mark.
But to clarify for those that aren't aware. These are tiny chips in the corner of the tenon from when the neck is set to the body. Some have them, some don't. The one on my R9 is the largest of any I came across. They are not exclusive to 2017 models, however are more visible on 2017 models due to the 'true historic' gap between the pickup ring and the fretboard.
That itself has been cited in other threads as an issue, which is not the case. The 'gap' is there on purpose and is visible on some original bursts too. I have seen no-gap les pauls with the tenon chips also. IIRC there was also some correlation between the serials and the gaps. Personally I don't care for the gap either way, and have R8's with and without it.
At the end of the day, I can't deny it would be easier if those chips weren't there, but they aren't unique to 2017.
Feedback
Some certainly did have the gap judging by the BOTB book but many did not, I personally don’t mind the gap either. The gap that bugs me is the gap between the tenon ‘tongue’ and the neck route that causes the same issue seen in teradas photo and one I’ve seen in many a 2017 blowout. As Terada also points it probably makes zero difference to sound and integrity I just think it looks sloppy. I personally have only seen this on Norlins, but never a Custom Shop from another year. It could be common in short tenon US les Paul’s too but their short tenon would make it impossible to spot and from what I understand the whole short tenon thing was meant to make neck fitting a bit easier for the factory. Anyhoos unless one of our luthier forum members chips in - I doubt it makes any odds and my point was simply that it shouldn’t be there on a guitar that cost either 2500 or 3500 with the discount. If someone doesn’t mind it and loves the guitar anyway then happy days - I’ll pull my neck in and stop being buzzkillington
Feedback
Thing is, as a matter of policy we don't just close threads because the thread starter doesn't like it any more - that would be chaos (and result in a lot of useful threads being prematurely closed). I'd suggest setting up an email filter to discard notifications for this thread instead.
The great thing about the 2017 run of R8s was the more R9-like neck profile. The bad thing was the gap between the end of the fretboard and the neck pick-up ring, which is of course purely cosmetic but an irritation to those who have an eye for such things.
I have an earlier 2017 R8 that pre-dates the blow-out and doesn't have the tenon gap. I thought the pickups were far too harsh but a set of Monty's solved that.
The likelyhood is they sold more R8's in 2017 then any other year as they were trying to raise cash. In any year there are probably more bad ones than good ones so the likelyhood to play a bad 2017 is higher. However some have got great ones and for £2,500, absolute bargains.
@tomajoha 's highlighting of a gap in a tenon joint.... well I'm no luthier but the gap I see is between the top of the tenon and the maple cap, not between the mahogany body and mahogany tenon. Given maple and mahogany are different woods and will therefore expand at different rates, I'd say it's probably wise to leave an expansion gap there. I don't think the necks were put in loose, the tenons and pockets would have been cut in a jig or by CNC, not by a bloke using his thumb to measure and then lining up the neck by eye whilst tring to secure it with a G-clamp. And there should be a 1/8" gap at the bottom, for expansion regardless.
As for the other flaws mentioned, it's the same stuff we had seen from Gibson for years. Nothing unusual about 2017. I've had far more expensive Gibson CS guitars from other years that have worse QC issues.
For those who bought one of these as their first CS guitar because it was cheap and when they recieved it thought "this isn't as nice as my Baja" well thats the reality of CS guitars. They aren't perfect, they are hand made, just like the originals. The Baja was smashed out on a CNC with another 500 that day. If you want handmade perfection you've got to cough up for a Collings I'm afraid.
Look how shody this looks!
Feedback
@Hattigol
A previously unsold 2018 model.
My head said brake, but my heart cried never.
Looks great, really like that the flame lines up to cross the centre, but is mainly on one half, distinctive.