Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Don't want to get too emotional here but I've really fallen for cycling this year and it's played a huge part in sorting myself out after a mid forties crisis last year. It's so fulfilling and I'm feeling as fit as I've ever done. Loving it.
Here's a photo from the mtb ride, a real wow moment at the end of a big climb that made it all worth it.
I'd get home after a ride, often a hilly 25, and I'd try to relax but I couldn't, and I knew I had to go out again.
Now I'm not suggesting YOU do that but cycling can get very addictive.
I did get a nice pic overlooking Loch Leven
They (Cyclopedia) have a good reputation,, having not been for years didn't know what thier stock was like, good to know
Thanks for the shop advice @jaycee and @thermionic
If I can ask yet another question.... what are your views on the relaxed, endurance v race geometry difference?
My Giant Defy (2015, Tiagra, Aluminium) is quite relaxed, more an endurance bike. It's the only road bike I've had, it feels comfortable, though I suspect it's a little large for me. I'm not someone who's racing and sprinting, though I want to get my average speed up, I also want to build my endurance and go for longer rides. At the moment, I don't spend that much time on the drop bars, though I'm trying to increase that. The roads around here are quite rough so I would like to improve comfort.
I'm thinking of upgrading to something like a Giant Defy Advanced 1 or 2, which is an endurance bike (compared to the racier TCR). Carbon frame, comes with tubeless 32mm tyres.. I think it would suit my needs over a bike with a more racing geometry? Would a 'racing' bike really be that more uncomfortable?
As for group set, is it worth paying 2-300 extra for the Ultegra over a 105?
Any wisdom would be appreciated!
What sort of riding to you want to do? Apologies if I've missed it upthread. If it were me I'd go for an endurance style bike - in comfort terms there's a lot to be said for wide tyres
It’s a fast bike, I really like it.
Depends what you’re priority is I guess, I’m used to racing geometry so I would tend to gravitate towards that.
I don’t think there’s any functional difference between 105 and Ultegra, Ultegra is just a bit lighter.
I'm leaning towards an endurance bike. Hopefully will get a chance to view a few bikes later this week, including Defy and TCR's.
I liked 42/52 front with 10-17 on the back.
Hope that makes sense
I built up a winter / tourer Kinesis 4s with 10 speed Tiagra and it's great. I've also got a BMC Team machine with SRAM Red so know what having a fancy groupset feels like and I reckon you'd be great with 105...
I put 105 on my Giant SCR and I have Ultegra on the Propel not a huge difference if any on how they perform, but the wheels in the picture I got from China carbon Super Team 50mm made a big improvement, smoother more comfortable and actually accelerated when I got out of the saddle, done over 3000 miles on them gone over some nasty potholes and all thats been needed was a slight turn of the spoke nipple.
I agree that you’re better off putting more money towards some lighter wheels. I haven’t ridden Shimano since the late 90s but I don’t think you’ll be disappointed by 105. I have Veloce on my winter bike which is probably equivalent to something a bit below 105, and that works flawlessly.
Cycled my heart out, got PBs... came dead last by a considerable distance!
If you enjoyed taking part, it's job done.