Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
They sound different because they have used different reference amps. No 2 plexis sound the same etc. and some sweeten the sounds a bit to make them more user friendly for those who have never used the real thing, and others leave them pure.
As always though, 50% of the achievable tone from a modeller depends on what it’s plugged into. A £200 powered PA cab won’t show it at its best.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
All hotting up again in the modeller world.
Neural dropped the price of the QC today which no doubt is a response to this, desktop editor due next week etc
Fractal quiet but no doubt something cooking - all good stuff!!!
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
As someone else already said you do have to wack that touch screen a bit but maybe you need something tougher near your boots. But you aren't playing Angry Birds on it and the fine tuning can be done with the knobs.
Was interesting in TheGuitarGeek video that he thought while the Fender owned amps sounded great (including 5150) the other stuff like Marshall sounded less good.
The Tone Master takes over that £1649 price point, making it £150 more expensive than the previously most expensive modeller in the UK.
I hope Fender got their pricing correct, as that price point feels like suicide for an unknown entity.
All the big modellers have had regular updates with new features that weren't there at launch, but were planned.
These products would never get released at all if they were waiting for a final firmware version!
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
As for the fx - I don't think anyone can answer that yet.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
No idea what they're thinking - they're not really bringing anything to the table in an area of the market already well catered for by Kemper, Fractal, Neural, Boss, Amplifire and a slew of plug-in makers all whom have this stuff nailed.
The whole appeal of the Tonemaster surely wasn't how well it modelled the amp (even if they bang on about how powerful the processor is and how it was all dedicated to a single model) was it? For me it was that fact that it was built into a proper cab with a proper speaker, attenuation available, digital connectivity and was light as well as single grab and go, gig ready package. A way to give you the benefits of modelling but in a 'real' amp.
A lot of the time I listen to YouTube reviews in the car whilst I'm driving etc to help pass the time. I check mixes in the car when I'm working on clients' music. I know the stereo well.
i listened to the Leon Todd review on the way to the office this morning, and the guitar sounds all sounded very mix ready to me. I.e. whatever he played, kinda sounded like it was already EQ's and was part of a record etc.
Usually this means they are going to be pretty bright.
Perhaps this is why people's initial reactions are that the tones are bright/"brittle"/"harsh". Perhaps the presets are designed to pretty much sit in a mix straight away. I actually thought it sounded pretty good.
UI is nice though