Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
the new game is fantastic (have not got too far in it yet/just had a battle with different factions after a woman chief turned up atop a sawtooth and started shit).
the giant cobra snake earlier was fantastic looking i had to say as is the whole game (not that zero dawn looks shabby).
i played about 20 mins of spiderman remastered and that game is great and looks amazing too (just all the moves i have to try to remember in my old age/ i am way of the exploding fist as opposed to streetfighter/tekken/virtua fighter etc move sets lol)
I will see what Yakuza titles are available on XBox One. Cheers!
World war 2 based would good but open to ideas.
I've had COD MW2 for a few weeks and looking to move on.
Battlefield 2042
I bought Baldurs Gate 3 for the Steam Deck and it is so boring. Graphics are low quality, there's soooo much dialogue, like a never ending amount, and the combat is extremely boring. I've asked Valve for a refund.
You can make it worth the money easily if you haven't had it before. Just use the time and finish 1 game would be worth it.
Reviews are out and most are great but a lot of the typically more honest/rigorous outlets haven't been sent advance copies, which is super shady and screams to be that Bethesda knows it ain't going to get amazing reviews across the board.
It looks like a return of old school rpgs - like fallout. I love dnd so I'm pretty jazzed for it, but it's not for everyone. I really liked Baldurs gate 1 and 2.
https://www.ign.com/articles/starfield-review
I'll leave starfield a month or so..
"If it smells like shit...It is probably shit"
I wonder if Bethesda have just been caught-up-to and passed by too many others now. Morrowind had a non-default setting - it was fantasy, but very not-D&D. Skyrim - while brilliant - had become a lot more generic.
And then do the opposite when landing. A bit like GTA5, when you get into a car or a helicopter or a plane. You just get in and fly off.
This to me is like a vital part now of a sandbox style game. Starfield lacks this part as it goes into a cut scene, also you can't fly into and planet and through the atmosphere and land. I know these game play elements are kinda superficial but it adds so much in terms of pulling you in.
The reviews I've seen hover around 7/10, which is often my happy place.
After TOTK the last thing I really need is another game that will take 200 hours off me!
If i had to pay £60 for it though....I would probably pass knowing the reviews now. I've never played Skyrim or Oblivion, even though i own both lol
I love Cyberpunk though, put like 150hrs into that.
It is worth saying that IGN France, and all the other European IGN sites gave it 9/10.
https://fr.ign.com/starfield/66663/review/test-starfield-des-etoiles-plein-les-jeux
But that was years ago, and the engine seems flawed now when you play it. Compare these games to Zelda, Witcher 3, Elden Ring etc and they seem of a completely different time.
If this game is similar to that it may not be modern enough. People don't want loading screen after loading screen, are we going to accept clunky AI and dialogue if the actual space and exploration experience isn't good enough?