Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Also 20W is still really fucking loud, which is a shame.
Give me a Tonemaster version...
I expect a lot of people have done this as it's a very obvious thing to do.
I had a proper one (well, a reissue) and it was so smegging loud it was basically impossible to get any proper drive and not go deaf. It was beautiful to look at though, unlike this new monstrosity.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
I thought it worth noting though that you can make a Tonemaster sound like a Marshall or an AC30 quite easily if you play other styles of music styles that are less Fender and more British voiced.
Maybe in years to come the whole front of the amp will be one giant LCD and when you change amps in the modelling the whole visual look of the amp and touchscreen knobs changed as well.
I like the styling - it’s emulating the very first JTM45s - and I can see why they’ve done it, to differentiate it from the SV20H.
If it has the same features as the other 20-watters I imagine the 5W setting will be the more useful than the loop to most people.
My technical question is…
… does it have an aluminium chassis?
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
https://marshall.com/amps/products/amps/studio/st20h
Get sharpening your pitchforks lads.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
The JTM45 is more polite / less brash, more spongy in attack. Warmer overdrive that doesn't take your head off quite so much.
No doubt it will still need to be cranked to buggery to actually get amp drive out of it - like the original.
Stick a Guv'nor in the front and it should give a great Gary Moore tone.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
Yes.
Spongy goodness.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
Given the history of the model’s most famous users, you would expect an SG played like Angus or a Les Paul played like Gary.
Or a Gretsch played like Roy .
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
That said. The Youtube demo's (maybe half a dozen) I've seen don't really seem to do a good job dialling in a classic JTM sound either.
I feel bad throwing shade, it's likely a great amp and I haven't heard anything that sounded bad - it just doesn't showcase what a typical JTM "should" sound like, given the vintage aesthetic they are going for.
I still miss my 89' V1 1962 bluesbreaker reissue. Had a slightly bigger cabinet than everything made after 91', allowing for KT66's to fit inside without being hard up against the wood. I had a pair of Scumback Alnico's that were rated at 30w each and suited the amp perfectly. Preamps tubes were NOS British Mullard 12xa7's. Perfection.
It was the ultimate Clapton rig for what I could afford. I think it cost me about £700 to get the amp in that condition and I regret selling it every day.