Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
No matter how much I like the GX100 specs, I'll stick with my Pod Go for now. It may not be touchscreen, but it's colourful, clear, and inspiring to use. In fact the screen was one of the key features that encouraged me to by it and was one of the reasons I didn't go Helix LT with its insipid outline only block depictions that are an eye strain to look at.
If I was buying a new MFX and didn't already have a Pod Go, regardless I would certainly go GX100 because of its spec, dual routing, processing power, touch screen (even with the hexagons) build quality, realistic pricing etc.
Having owned a Pod Go, which was great, and now a Helix LT, I’d go with the LT all day long.
Sure, it's a more powerful and sophisticated unit. But physical size and weight were huge considerations for me.
My den/ office/ gear room is quite small, about 7ft 6" by 11ft. I have a fitted desk and fitted cupboard/ guitar rack, and good quality office chair. I also have a heavy duty shelf for guitars. My amps are on plinths that allows me to slide in and out the VC12 floor controller for my AD120VTX Valvetronic, Boss BCB60 pedal board, and my mini fx board for the Valvetronix.
As my amps/ mfx/ guitar collection has grown I'm now pretty much maxed out space wise. Even my acoustic has to live in our TV room.
Whilst I've designed it to make maximum use of space, it means I have very little useable floor space. The Pod Go is compact enough so that I can leave it on the floor. The Helix LT is considerably larger and that means it's much more awkward to leave on the floor.
Gigging wise I have a Vox Tonelab SE that is a big, heavy unit. I also have a Vox Tonelab LE. With power supply overall size and weight of the TLSE is very similar to Helix floor, and TLLE is not far off Helix LT. These have to be kept in gig bags as I have insufficient floor space to keep these out when not being used.
I can put Pod Go in a padded lap top bag with cables, PSU and 2xBespeco switches, and carry it with a guitar and a Headrush FRFR108 in two hands, one carrying trip.
So having 2 bigger heavier MFX units already, I absolutely did not want another big heavy MFX unit. So the reason I've gone into this detail is to explain that the factors affecting my decision to buy Pod Go as my daily 'go to' MFX was very carefully considered, together with my 'must have' needs rather than 'nice to haves but not essential' features.
What's been happening more recently in the MFX market is a move away from Helix size units, and a need for more compact, lighter MFX units with good floor control. These include Pod Go, Zoom G6, Mooer GE300, and the new Boss GX100 albeit the latter is quite long although narrower. Although each has USPs, none of these are as full featured as Helix LT. Of these only GX100 has dual amp routing.
Helix came out in 2015, 7yrs ago, and thats 'old' in MFX modelling terms. So I'm pretty sure Line 6 is already hard at work designing a new generation of MFX units and competitors are doing similar. So once something more compact comes out that's significantly better than Pod Go, then I might look to to upgrade.
So whilst its great that you're enjoying Helix LT it simply doesn't fit my current needs.
- It’s about 1/2 the size & weight of a Helix.
- It’s just as easy to programme on the unit as a Helix, just different, and it doesn’t take long to get to grips with it. I’ve not downloaded the Mac software for it yet & was holding off ordering the Bluetooth adapter until I know if it’s staying or not.
Initial thoughts are it's very well made, and egonomic. I can already see it being a good tool for pub gigs where I don't want to take my full board and heavy amp.
First downside is the presets sound like absolute pap, so will have to build some of my own and dive into the usability before I can make a fair judgement.
Looking for something with a bit more control than my HX Stomp, I really liked the LT but it’s too big and heavy so looking for the halfway house.
In memory mode, it would be good to be able to label the 1-4 switches with the patch names. You also don’t seem to be able to allocate parameters to the expression pedal (apart from volume or Wah) but maybe I haven’t found it yet. Tbh I never found this particularly intuitive on the helix.
Looking at other options like the Headrush MX5, but everything has a compromise and the Headrush needs its own PSU, which is a pain.
Perhaps you'll get some good results with multiple drives on the GX-100. I know I want to try cascading drives as I've never had a multi-fx that can do that before.
But gigging I’m still welding to my valve amp.
Through the valve amp the analog pedals still have the edge although the digital drive pedal models have got much better since the last generation. The HX Timmy is more than passible, it’s just not quite as special as my Protein Drive.
One thing I’m thinking of is changing me board (again) from a Warwick Tres 3.1 to a pedal train Junior, which would fit on the GX100 and a few pedals.
Or just go Pod Go, but I’m concerned the DSP and other limitations would bug me. Plus I think the Boss effects probably sound better.
From a gigging perspective, patch naming is, at least for me, essential.
Fundamentally, despite the obvious charms of the GX100, I realised that my Pod Go, despite its shortcomings, really did meet most of my current needs and whilst there were features of the GX100 that were 'nice to haves', there was actually nothing that was essential for my current needs. In addition to Pod Go I still have my Vox Tonelab SE and LE that may be old tech, but are still great gigging MFX units that are built like a tank.
And there were features of Pod Go that I'd miss such as snap shots, global switching from volume to wah on every patch, much larger IR capacity, many more amp, cab, mic and effects. And the more compact size and lower weight are pluses too.
With regards tone, that's always going to be highly subjective. The guy that was selling the GX100 is a professional, globally touring musician. He has HX Stomp and Mooer MFX, and said providing each unit is set up properly, the tonal differences were minimal especially with IRs. Each unit does the job well.
The Pod Go has a great colour screen, and the edit software is excellent. I have an older PC with Win 7 64bit, and I wasn't sure if GX100 was compatible. I also didn't fancy having to learn a new unit and set up new software. I'm pretty proficient with Pod Go now and even with touch screen, there's still a fair bit to learn with the GX100 and I really just want to enjoy playing and not have to set up new patches from scratch.
I'm also curious to see if anything new is introduced at NAMM.
The GX100 is a great unit, and if I didn't already have Pod Go, I'd have snapped it up in a heartbeat. But as I already have it, I had to weigh up pros and cons and make the best call for my needs.