Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Feature wise I think they nailed it. And the effects will be excellent. I'm sure more amps will come but how many do you need? 16 irs onboard is enough for me. That avoids a huge rabbit hole.
If I do use the amps, a smaller number of great sounding ones is more useful to me than 300 slight variations a la Line 6.
Horses for courses though!
This could explain some of the poor sounding clips so far. Waiting for some comparison clips to see how it stacks up compared to the GT and see what people think of the feel in comparison. Hopefully Leon Todd will do a proper run through of the amp models through his IRs as I thought his GT1000 tones were the best I've heard out of it.
Out of all the Boss stuff I've seen, the most consistently decent clips across all YouTube channels have been with the IR-200 so far. I guess having all that power dedicated to just amp models must make a difference somehow.
Perhaps it’s less DSP intensive modelling or just nobody has had chance to dial it in yet.
I’m half interested, could swap my stomp for one and have a few more buttons to work with. But the effects would beed to be amazing.
The GT1000 has fx always on which I'm told make patch and fx switching virtually instantaneous. GX100 doesnt work this way so don't know how the GX100 switching will compare here.
However, I wouldn't be surprised if Boss revamp the GT1000 with more intuitive UI and touch screen in the very near future.
I would also be surprised if manufacturers like Mooer and Line 6 also didn't have some similar new touchscreen units in the works for 2022.
Re the sample rate thing yeah I couldn't tell the difference in the final output between 44.1 or 48 output sample rate for instance, my thought was does a higher sample and bit rate going IN to the processor allow it to process the guitar signal more accurately and therefore end up sounding or feeling more realistic as a result. That seems to be the opinion of people using the GT1000. Never played one so I can't say one way or the other - all I know is I was never 100% happy with the feel of Line 6 stuff. It was better with the oversampling update but I still got a better feel out of other plugins.
Which is why I'm using a Ditto+...
My Vox Tonelab SE, that came out in 2004 also has A/B amp switching. I can have two different amp models and two different cab models in the same patch which is a really cool feature that's invaluable for gigging (can't have both at same time though). The fx and fx settings have to be shared though so it's not fully dual routing...But hey, it was way ahead of its time when it came out 18yrs ago.
I'm mulling one of these over, rather than 'upgrading' my HXStomp with a midi footswitch and expression pedal
The UI looks good with the touch screen and bluetooth appeals.
I'd just need to know what the effects are like, I'd use mainly as an effects only board, on my pedalboard with analog gain, with the occasional modeling use at home only. But tbh, I can still get native for $99 so would probably keep my foot in with Helix at home that way.
Hopefully they are the 200 and 500 series effects.
I'm torn between giving it a whirl or getting another HX Stomp.
The touch screen certainly seems to be a big winner and having watched Glenn Delaune's very good video, it looks as if the GX100 is pretty easy to use. I also like that every footswitch is fully assignable/ programmable which really helps with versatility.
But I didn't know about the ability to kick in e.g. a boost, amp gain etc via the same footswitch, ie where it has a double function, which seems a really cool feature.
I had been looking at a GT-1000 as I think the tones in the AIRD Boss units are simply better than anything I can get from a Helix or Headrush, especially for the Marshall tones I prefer. My only quibble with the GT-1000 was the price as it's a lot of money for what I'd be using it for, which is probably just home use. I don't need loads of amp models, just really good amp models. frankly, if it has a good clean, crunch and high gain, I'm happy and the X-models will do that really well without having to consider anything else. I don't need to run hundreds of effects simultaneously so if I can toggle between two amp settings and turn on a number of effects for a solo using one footswitch, I'm good to go. The GX-100 also looks easier to use than the GT-1000 and at considerably less money, it's a complete no brainer for me. Can't wait to get hold of it.
I do like my Pod Go but I miss the ability to A/B change between two different amp and cab models in the same patch, which is something I can do with my Vox Tonelab SE. The TLSE can't do 2 amps at once though which I think the GX100 can do?
I concur that the price of the GT1000 and it's more awkward UI make it less attractive, at least for me, than the GX100 but as I already have a Pod Go and a TLSE, I'm not immediately looking to dive in and buy another mfx unit. Not least because I think during 2022 we'll be seeing some new MFX being introduced including a possible successor to the GT1000 with touch screen.
From a live gigging perspective, I still prefer the immediacy of real knobs and rotary selectors in my TLSE. Even though it's old tech with no IR facilities and way more limited options, it still sounds good and I don't get distracted by DSP limit grey outs.
Been thinking about changing to this for smaller gigs, if it also doubles up as working for my acoustic, it might just be a winner.
with the pod go i wish you could change amps in the snapshots that would be even better .