Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Before buying my 2017 I spent a while reading a number of threads on a certain les paul specific forum where they were talking about the plastics, TH spec, 2015 and 2016 historics, CS serials, CR serials, and standards.
Posters were getting in a tiz about the differences, all quite silly really, and I must have blended too many parameters! Doesn't help that I also watched a video by andertons about CS's being sold with a short tennon in June 2016 where they were specifically talking about the tennons being sold on those 2016 models, while on the threads 2016 models were being included as rebranded historic 'standards'.
To clarify, I do not think that this relates to the tennon, it may relate to other specs, including plastics, according to the other forum. There was however a lot of uncertainty over what the actual spec was for 2017.
@Brize s comment about the change in manufacture appeared to be potential evidence to support some claims made in those threads, hence I asked the question.
To me, I'm not bothered about the minutiae, I'm not even bothered about the tennon , but I understand that should I want to sell in future, I'd most likely be selling to a market that were.
just brought my 2nd of these just now, the 8 pound 1 ounce cherry from coda
I don't actually care, but I'm still confused.
Is this a larger, smaller or normal gap?
Mine is a later '17 iirc ...with a 6 digit serial number
My Trading Feedback | You Bring The Band
Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after youI also weighed it today, again, largely irrelevant to me as I'm a big guy and don't notice the weight.
8lbs 14.1 oz
Being almost exactly between my ideal weights of: "nothing at all" and "the maximum I can comfortably hold on a strap, on my shoulder, for several hours"; that is perfect.
My Trading Feedback | You Bring The Band
Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after youMy 2014:
My Feb 2017:
How would you say this one looks @Brize ? Looks the same as @Legionreturns to me
Also, some of the gaps are at an angle (see Legionreturns) which to me implies a product of manufacturing tolerances and materials rather than design.
Its minutiae for sure but then we are paying top dollar for historic re-enactment so some of us must care!
@Moe_Zambeek
See here - the five-digit guitars have the gap; the six-digit guitars don't:
https://www.guitarguitar.co.uk/product/180814331286008-1946607--gibson-custom-shop-les-paul-standard-1959-figured-top-f
There will almost certainly be one, but I've yet to find an exception to this rule.
Edit: What I've posted above is rubbish - there are plenty of examples on the GuitarGuitar website that disprove my contention.
Historically correct.
Washed cherry, five digit serial, wide gap.
Iced tea, six digit serial, tiny gap.
Whouda thunk it?
Lovely Top on it too.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Gibson-Custom-Shop-1958-Les-Paul-Standard-VOS-Washed-Cherry/153173694053?epid=15018956705&hash=item23a9dd1665:g:gqIAAOSwO95blVxn
I love the look of it though.
Why would you leave it on? It's packaging!
My Trading Feedback | You Bring The Band
Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after youI took mine off. It's one of those ones you could put back on again if you want - a bit like the old car tax holders that used to stick to your windscreen.
Mine's a December '16 and it had the same sticker as the rest here, not the one on the eBay guitar