Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Many guitars have a re-sale value. Some you'll never want to sell.
Stockist of: Earvana & Graphtech nuts, Faber Tonepros & Gotoh hardware, Fatcat bridges. Highwood Saddles.
Pickups from BKP, Oil City & Monty's pickups.
Expert guitar repairs and upgrades - fretwork our speciality! www.felineguitars.com. Facebook too!
I wouldn't be surprised if the demeanor of the prankster while stood next to his mother is his general behaviour that that may have had a bearing on the outcome too.
He's a big guy and a cocky cunt in country full of armed people. I'm not advocating his death, but he shouldn't be remotely surprised.
Bit shitty all round, but overall, in the context of the USA, I think my sympathies lie with the shooter.
Guns as the first response? A good punch in the guts would have done it.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
The fact that guns are so prevalent in the US is a major problem, and the fact that - unlike here and many other countries - the default position is that you can own a gun, rather than anyone who wants one needs to apply for a license, is also a major problem. You have to wonder if the shooter has some issues with mental stability, given how quickly he pulled and shot.
But equally, is that what happened? There's no requirement in the US to have any training in order to own a gun, and in Texas, there's not even a requirement to have a permit to carry a concealed hand gun. So it's entirely possible that Colie pulled the gun, intending to threaten Cook, and fired accidentally. A light trigger, and a wielder who doesn't know to keep their finger outside the trigger guard until they intend to fire, could easily end with an accidental discharge.
That said, the general thinking is that if you're going to pull a gun on someone, you need to be prepared to use it. Otherwise they'll just take your gun from you and shoot you with it. So Colie might have just committed, and pulled and shot really fast.
I don't think Colie was justified, but equally anyone that harasses people - particularly strangers in a public place - should be subject to legal penalties. I don't find prankster-style comedy funny - occasionally, if it's something along the lines of celebrities doing hidden camera shows, it can be OK (the Dave Lee Travis Gotcha Oscar made me laugh when I was a kid, although mostly for the bit at the end after the reveal) but generally I find it to be repulsive and mean. It's easy-target comedy that relies on people being made uncomfortable (at the least - often scared) and the people that perpetrate it don't deserve the money or fame they get from it.
In this case, I think NBA rules should apply - one foul doesn't cancel out another. Colie should have been convicted of attempted manslaughter (clearly not premeditated, and definitely extenuating circumstances) and Cook should have been charged with, and convicted of, harassment and intimidation (insert appropriate legal terms as necessary). Colie shouldn't be allowed to own guns, or at the very least shouldn't be able to carry a loaded weapon on his person outside of a registered shooting club. Cook shouldn't be allowed to film strangers in public.
But until America realises that the right to bear arms was appropriate at the time of the second amendment, but not any more, and that the right was conferred by an amendment and therefore isn't as unalienable as many pro-gun people claim, this sort of thing will keep on happening.
Just for full disclosure, I own several shotguns. I don't believe that guns have no place in modern society (I use mine for clay pigeon shooting, for example), however I also believe that access should be difficult and there are people who should not be allowed near them.
I'm not saying that shooting was the right thing to do, but there are many of us for whom punching things isn't really an option, especially when the prospective target is a large man.
In a country where guns are 100% legal and using them to defend yourself is 100% legal, it is not unreasonable to argue that the shooter was acting sensibly and according to the law. And in fact, that is exactly what the jury did: said he was guilty of a fairly minor act of firearm carelessness and NOT GUILTY of the shooting as it was self defence.
Do the yanks have stupid gun laws? Sure they do. But after a fair trial, he was found NOT GUILTY by a jury of his peers.
Personally, I'd like to have seen the selfish bastard get what he deserved, which is a good humiliating thrashing he will remember and actually learn something from instead of just a minor wound which doesn't seem to have taught him anything at all. Unfortunately, the coward took care to harass someone much smaller and weaker than himself.
Was the shooting justified? Not in my book. Just the same, the arsehole deserved everything he got. Pity he didn't get something he could learn from.
1: he walks away
2: he is pinned against the counter where it us awkward to escape
3: he backs off
4: he says "no"
5: he backs away faster
6: he defends himself against the phone shoved in his face
7: he says "stop"
8: he tries to escape
9: he says "STOP!"
10:the arsehole still keeps on coming and, finally, the victim shootsl
Could he have threatened rather than shot? Maybe. Hard to be sure that would have worked. Especially given how much bigger and faster the young arsehole is, and how close he was.
.Tannin said:
But he would rather have shot than threatened.
I'm willing to bet that a good proportion of males that apply for and get a concealed carry permit (in states where you even need one) spend a good deal of time thinking about using that gun.
I’m speculating, but I imagine that carrying a weapon must stimulate the carrier to mentally run through scenarios where it might be used.
I think it’s normal for people to imagine what they might unleash on another, physically, verbally, whatever, should circumstances dictate it. A bit of justified aggression can be a pleasurable daydream.
So allowing people to carry guns around condemns the poor blighters to a violent inner life of immature fantasy.
Plus you get instances like this where the carrier uses it at the first legally justifiable opportunity because… - well why else does he carry the damn thing around?
In America...both legally and morally, he was in the right to defend himself. Different country, different standard. He had a permit to carry and he was found Not Guilty. So whilst my own morals and education would say he should not have fired, but there is a part of me that thinks the prankster got what was coming considering where he is.
I do not feel bad for the prankster being shot...had he been killed my tune might have changed but as it stands, I don't feel bad for feeling this way.
In the back of my mind, there is this lingering thought of the Thin Skull Rule, or the Egg Shell rule in the states, where you cannot go around hitting someone in the head no matter how lightly because you never know who has a "thin skull", I know this probably isn't applicable in this scenario but the logic in that "you just never know who is going to snap", apply.
We can't apply our own European laws and morals to Americans but the standard there is different, so I have to look through that lens when analysing this.
Normally in these shooting cases they're bailed on the same day.
What's going on with this guy that he's still in custody despite being judged not guilty on the most serious charge?
In fact, I'd go further, I'd shoot all their brain dead followers.
Maybe not fatally but enough to cause them excruciating pain, the wankers.
Youtube prankster shot
Good. Assholes.
But this is hindsight, and the guy felt suitably harassed enough to shoot the idiot. Who knows what his history is, whether he was bullied relentlessly, whether he has severe mental health issues, whether his friends and coworkers are attacked constantly while at work. Maybe he thought he saw a weapon.
The law says (here at least) reasonable force is what you felt was reasonable at the time, although this does in fact need to be reasonable. But who can decide that at the time, or know what damage is going to be caused by reasonable force? To him that may have been reasonable in that moment when he assessed the situation.
Bottom line, he fucked around and found out. Leave people alone, don't harass someone who looks like he's tired of life and your chances of getting shot go down drastically.
I'm sure pulling out the handgun and saying "Get the fuck away from me", would have been a better thing to do.
I'm pretty sure that the little prankster, the second little prankster and the camera person would have shat their keks and headed for the hills......or maybe the Burger King.
I'm not entirely adverse to a bit of a ruck now and again btw - getting into about a couple of dozen tussles a week at the local judo club kinda helps on that front - but two / three menacing characters coming on to you like that, and one of them about 4 weight categories bigger.. ? I'd have been looking for help, or the door post haste - and the little guy didn't look much of a runner either.
Given it was 'Merica, and there is a culture around right to bear arms, defend yourself - I'm not all surprised he pulled and fired the gun, and equally not surprised (nor indeed greatly troubled by) the fact that the jury took a lenient view.
I'm not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with me.
They could run, or they would go "ooooooh gun! this is great content! You are not going to shoot, what are you going to do with that?" and then entice him some more. There were 3 of them after all.
I am sure one of the sayings they have is that if you are not prepared to pull the trigger, don't pull out the gun. The guy just skipped a couple of steps in between and went straight from pulling it out and shooting. Shoot first, apologise later is the name of the game here.
The people perpetrating such behaviors are just spoilt, mean spirited, nasty selfish cunts, videoing the victims of their bullying for 'lolz', 'shits & giggles' & likes from other like minded moronic twats.