Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused). Kdh Is back - Guitar Discussions on The Fretboard
UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45

Kdh Is back

What's Hot
12467

Comments

  • darthed1981darthed1981 Frets: 10322
    Philly_Q said:
    This'll get me shot down in flames, but I quite like KDH's band, and his guitar playing.
    You are KDH and ICM £5
    We have to be so very careful, what we believe in...
    4reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Philly_QPhilly_Q Frets: 20197
    edited August 2023
    Philly_Q said:
    This'll get me shot down in flames, but I quite like KDH's band, and his guitar playing.
    You are KDH and ICM £5
    Nope.  I wouldn't mind being able to grow my hair that long (again) but it's almost certainly a bad idea at my age.  Although having said that, Geo. Lynch looked pretty damn cool with his wizard look a year or two ago.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • darthed1981darthed1981 Frets: 10322
    Philly_Q said:
    Philly_Q said:
    This'll get me shot down in flames, but I quite like KDH's band, and his guitar playing.
    You are KDH and ICM £5
    Nope.  I wouldn't mind being able to grow my hair that long (again) but it's almost certainly a bad idea at my age.  Although having said that, Geo. Lynch looked pretty damn cool with his wizard look a year or two ago.
    I know you aren't.  I sincerely doubt his taste in movies is on your level.
    We have to be so very careful, what we believe in...
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Philly_QPhilly_Q Frets: 20197
    Philly_Q said:
    Philly_Q said:
    This'll get me shot down in flames, but I quite like KDH's band, and his guitar playing.
    You are KDH and ICM £5
    Nope.  I wouldn't mind being able to grow my hair that long (again) but it's almost certainly a bad idea at my age.  Although having said that, Geo. Lynch looked pretty damn cool with his wizard look a year or two ago.
    I know you aren't.  I sincerely doubt his taste in movies is on your level.
    If he was into movies he'd undoubtedly let us know (about the bad ones) on his YouTube channel!
    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • digitalscreamdigitalscream Frets: 25239
    edited August 2023
    Well, I didn’t care about any of this, and then I saw the Captain’s video response, and perhaps there was a point to whatever this kid was trying to do. 

    Seems that six months ago they were claiming Victory Amps were the ‘perfect’ amps! I mean, he really should have stated he had some involvement in Victory. It’s not like the amps are any good either! 

    See, that would be a compelling argument as long as nobody looks too closely, ie were it not for the fact that "The Perfect <x>..." is a common video title on the Andertons channel.

    The key here is whether Victory gets treatment any different from other brands because of his investment - which would be pretty hard to argue based on that video's title unless you're also saying that he has similar stakes in Valeton, Cordoba, Blackstar, Martin and Squier/Fender.

    In fact, the presence, relative ubiquity and exclusive-first-look-videos of Victory amps in their videos is no different to the way (for example) Blackstar were treated by the channel back in the day when they were something new.
    <space for hire>
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • The Andertons videos are adverts, it's as simple as that. I'm not a fan - in fact I find them pretty much impossible to watch - but there's nothing nefarious there. It's just advertising.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 6reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • BigsbyBigsby Frets: 2770
    nacnudnai said:
    DrBob said:
    So can anyone confirm whether Kelan is right in his assertion that Lee Anderton is breaking some Advertising Standards code or law by not declaring his interest in Victory amps ? 
    I don't work directly in this "field", but somewhat close to it and I have knowledge in online infringement issues, copyright, etc.

    It would be helpful if KDH actually spelled out what laws/codes he thinks are broken here. Personally, I don't see a legal issue with Lee owning a brand and selling it his shop - declared or undeclared. Shops like ASDA, Argos, other companies beginning with an A, etc, own a bunch of smaller brands that they don't openly state as owned by them. I've had KDH's video on in the background, so maybe I missed it, but I'm not sure if he pointed this out as completely okay and not the issue.

    Where Lee does actually potentially fall foul of the law is under the CAP code - a part of consumer protection law which would fall under the Competition and Markets Authority and Trading Standards. This is purely based on his presence on social media (which would include YouTube) - with the key issue being "non-broadcast advertising".  The irony of Lee's signature Chapman Guitar being the CAP10, and Lee now potentially breaching the CAP code, is not lost on me.

    The CAP code directly relates to non-broadcast advertisements among other things, with a particular slant on influencers or other online personalities.  It lists a bunch of stuff that it applies to, including this: advertorials. This is broadly defined as an advertisement that is written or produced to look like editorial content...rather than an advert...hence the portmanteau. These are absolutely fine as a concept - not remotely illegal - but when it is done online by an influencer/online personality on social media, the law states any financial connection must be clearly declared.

    The CAP code gives its own definition, which I think actually confuses this situation a bit lol.  An advertorial is an advertisement feature, announcement or promotion, the content of which is controlled by the marketer, not the publisher, that is disseminated in exchange for a payment or other reciprocal arrangement. How this definition strictly applies probably hinges on whether Lee would be considered the publisher - or whether Andertons the store is the publisher - of the YouTube content. Just because he owns the shop, doesn't mean he is necessarily the publisher. In this situation, as he is a partner of Victory Amplifiers, I would say he qualifies as the marketer.

    Note that the definition from the CAP code states: "advertisement feature, announcement or promotion". Even if Andertons' videos are not openly advertising Victory Amps, they do announce new models, and do "promote" them - under most interpretations of promote. 

    To get to the main point, because Lee has never openly declared this is any of the videos (or social media posts, to my knowledge) and would easily qualify as an influencer, there is a chance he has breached the CAP code. For those who still find the term influencer to be completely mystifying and pointless, in this context the ASA actually define it for us (thanks ASA): any human, animal or virtually produced persona that is active on any online social media platform, such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Twitch, YouTube, and others.

    There are many cases of this happening, and most of them happen accidentally (as it is a civil law matter, there isn't really much requirement if any for motive). At 21:48, KDH posts a screenshot of a gov.uk page which highlights the Molly Mae Hague matter, which is very similar in its bare facts to the Andertons case. There are countless others.

    Whether anything will happen to Lee - probably not. I'm not sure of the penalty for this breach of the code, maybe a £1000 summary judgement or something, and a lesson learned.

    Apologies for the essay, I've tried to keep it all relevant!

    My view: Lee didn't do anything intentionally nefarious and probably was not aware of these laws actually applying to him. KDH hasn't said anything incorrect or defamatory, and is free to post the content he wants as long as it remains correct and does not defame.
    Thanks for that post, to me it's undoubtedly the most relevant and helpful post so far. It pretty much confirms what I thought after watching the video: Lee seems to have recognised that he must declare any interest that his business has in brands he's promoting/reviewing/demoing on YouTube, but naively thought that his personal interests don't need to be disclosed in the same situation. 

    For the argument that Andertons are just selling stuff, so get over it: There's a reason we have rules, regulations and laws around advertising and selling goods and services, and when they're getting broken or bent out of shape, clearly something has gone wrong. IMHO not a particularly big deal in this case, but equally there's no point in attacking the YouTuber who shone some light on it either; it's better that this has come to light and consumers can be aware of it.

    I suspect some of the arguments in this topic are based more on a love/loathing of Andertons than the actual situation.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 8reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • digitalscreamdigitalscream Frets: 25239
    Just food for thought: what about TPS and GigRig? Obviously everyone here knows that Dan owns GigRig, but if you were just perusing their board-building videos, it rarely comes up; it would look to the casual viewer like they just always use GigRig power supplies so it's an implied recommendation via product placement.

    That's basically the same criticism that's being levelled at Lee, yet nobody seems to have a problem with it at TPS.
    <space for hire>
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 6reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Power_FreakPower_Freak Frets: 90
    edited August 2023
    Just food for thought: what about TPS and GigRig? Obviously everyone here knows that Dan owns GigRig, but if you were just perusing their board-building videos, it rarely comes up; it would look to the casual viewer like they just always use GigRig power supplies so it's an implied recommendation via product placement.

    That's basically the same criticism that's being levelled at Lee, yet nobody seems to have a problem with it at TPS.
    That's really quite different:

    1. TPS was originally broadcast on the gigrig channel
    2. They might not mention it every video but Mick refers to things like: "Dan's power supplies" often or "to plug Dan's products a bit"
    3. Dan's social media handles are "danielthegigrig" and the like
    4. You go on the gigrig website Dan's name/face is plastered all over it - you don't have to hunt around guitar forums to find out there's a connection

    Could they do with a comment in the video description or mention it every video? Sure, that would be better... But it's a hell of a lot more transparent than Lee's involvement with Victory.


    EDIT: Also look at:  youtube.com/@ThatPedalShow/about - it clearly states the relationship:

    "We are…

     Daniel Steinhardt Boss man at TheGigRig, a company dedicated to helping guitarists and bass players achieve constant inspiration from their tones. Daniel has also been a professional guitar player since he was about, ooh, eight."

    Totally different kettle of fish!


    Bigsby said:

    I suspect some of the arguments in this topic are based more on a love/loathing of Andertons than the actual situation.
    This sums the whole situation to me tbh
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 6reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • digitalscreamdigitalscream Frets: 25239
    edited August 2023
    Just food for thought: what about TPS and GigRig? Obviously everyone here knows that Dan owns GigRig, but if you were just perusing their board-building videos, it rarely comes up; it would look to the casual viewer like they just always use GigRig power supplies so it's an implied recommendation via product placement.

    That's basically the same criticism that's being levelled at Lee, yet nobody seems to have a problem with it at TPS.
    That's really quite different:

    1. TPS was originally broadcast on the gigrig channel
    2. They might not mention it every video but Mick refers to things like: "Dan's power supplies" often or "to plug Dan's products a bit"
    3. Dan's social media handles are "danielthegigrig" and the like
    4. You go on the gigrig website Dan's name/face is plastered all over it - you don't have to hunt around guitar forums to find out there's a connection

    Could they do with a comment in the video description or mention it every video? Sure, that would be better... But it's a hell of a lot more transparent than Lee's involvement with Victory.


    EDIT: Also look at:  youtube.com/@ThatPedalShow/about - it clearly states the relationship:

    "We are…

     Daniel Steinhardt Boss man at TheGigRig, a company dedicated to helping guitarists and bass players achieve constant inspiration from their tones. Daniel has also been a professional guitar player since he was about, ooh, eight."

    Totally different kettle of fish!
    So...in order to find the relationship, you have to go off and search for the information, which you wouldn't know to look for unless you already know about the relationship or happened upon a video where it's hinted at*; the casual viewer would never know. I'm slightly more than a casual viewer, and I've never seen any of those things. As far as I know, the casual viewer is the one advertising standards are based on.

    You're right that it's more transparent, but it's still relatively obfuscated.

    At the other end of the scale, you have Linus at LTT, who mentions his investment in Framework every time he reviews a laptop (the caveat being the distinction between a review and a demo, of course).

    * - Which brings up the question of whether KDH already knew about the relationship before he started looking into it, then one day decided that it was about time that Lee Anderton should be the target of one of his videos. He's not a journalist, so he doesn't get paid to go into all of the research that'd be required if he can't make a scandalous video about it. If it had turned out that the partners in Victory were all no-name finance dudes...no video, no money. That being the case...feels very, very shady to me.
    <space for hire>
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • StrangefanStrangefan Frets: 5820
    Hmmmmmmm mm. I quite like KDH's videos, 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Strat54Strat54 Frets: 2170
    Clearly Kelan's band W.A.*.K.E.R need more subscribers and followers...869? Great.....my dog had more social media followers and he's been dead three years.
    I'm not watching his video its a none story and I don't want to give him a view extra because anyones mantra that is 'I annoy people on the internet' its pointless wasting precious minutes on him. His videos are made to for monetary gains only and he does this by targetting the heavy hitters like Beatro, Lee and Chappers etc. Good luck to him, I would suspect he was pissed for being the spectacled ginger nerd at school playing dungeons & dragons that got bullied....or maybe his middle name really is Dougal.....next.
    2reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • SeziertischSeziertisch Frets: 1170
    edited August 2023
    I find it fascinating the KDH seems to trigger some people so badly.

    Was it a little bit weird that Lee referred to Victory and the “guys at Victory” in the third person when he was in fact part owner of the business and, though not involved in the day to day running of it, would be considered by most people to be one of the said “guys”? Yes. Maybe he genuinely believes all the positive stuff he has to say about Victory amps, but he would definitely be considered by most people to be potentially less impartial towards them that he would towards some other brands they carry. 

    Was all this deserving of a 30-minute “expose”? No.

    Was it deserving of multiple threads on thefretboard? Probably not.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 6reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • So...in order to find the relationship, you have to go off and search for the information, which you wouldn't know to look for unless you already know about the relationship or happened upon a video where it's hinted at*; the casual viewer would never know. I'm slightly more than a casual viewer, and I've never seen any of those things. As far as I know, the casual viewer is the one advertising standards are based on.

    You're right that it's more transparent, but it's still relatively obfuscated.

    At the other end of the scale, you have Linus at LTT, who mentions his investment in Framework every time he reviews a laptop (the caveat being the distinction between a review and a demo, of course).

    * - Which brings up the question of whether KDH already knew about the relationship before he started looking into it, then one day decided that it was about time that Lee Anderton should be the target of one of his videos. He's not a journalist, so he doesn't get paid to go into all of the research that'd be required if he can't make a scandalous video about it. If it had turned out that the partners in Victory were all no-name finance dudes...no video, no money. That being the case...feels very, very shady to me.
    Clicking on the "about us" of a youtube page is hardly "searching for information" - it's quite clearly a different scenario entirely. Go on the gigrig website and Dan's name and links to TPS are there to see - that's not the case with the Victory website. Again entirely different - I think it's safe to assume in this day and age if you're buying a product the average consumer will log onto the company website, in the case of gigrig you'll realise there's a link to TPS, in the case of Victory you'd still have no idea about Lee.

    The opinion on KDH is irrelevant in my view, play the ball and not the man - what he stated in his video appears to be factually accurate (albeit with dramatization and a leading tone, but that's a different discussion). Again this comes down to the quote before (in reverse):

    Bigsby said:

    I suspect some of the arguments in this topic are based more on a love/loathing of Andertons than the actual situation.
    Just replace Andertons with KDH
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 8reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Philly_Q said:
    Philly_Q said:
    This'll get me shot down in flames, but I quite like KDH's band, and his guitar playing.
    You are KDH and ICM £5
    Nope.  I wouldn't mind being able to grow my hair that long (again) but it's almost certainly a bad idea at my age.  Although having said that, Geo. Lynch looked pretty damn cool with his wizard look a year or two ago.
    Do it, George looked like the Wycher which I haven’t watched but seen trailers 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Alex2678Alex2678 Frets: 909


    * - Which brings up the question of whether KDH already knew about the relationship before he started looking into it, then one day decided that it was about time that Lee Anderton should be the target of one of his videos. He's not a journalist, so he doesn't get paid to go into all of the research that'd be required if he can't make a scandalous video about it. If it had turned out that the partners in Victory were all no-name finance dudes...no video, no money. That being the case...feels very, very shady to me.
    I think he absolutely knew and decided to do a vid. All the ‘I just wondered who was behind it’ was pantomime 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • digitalscreamdigitalscream Frets: 25239
    edited August 2023
    Clicking on the "about us" of a youtube page is hardly "searching for information" - it's quite clearly a different scenario entirely. Go on the gigrig website and Dan's name and links to TPS are there to see - that's not the case with the Victory website. Again entirely different - I think it's safe to assume in this day and age if you're buying a product the average consumer will log onto the company website, in the case of gigrig you'll realise there's a link to TPS, in the case of Victory you'd still have no idea about Lee.
    That's fair, except that you can easily go through the entire purchase process on thegigrig.com and not ever encounter Dan's name or a reference to TPS - and most people won't care who owns the company they're buying from enough to go looking.

    That's my point - it's not readily apparent at the time of watching the videos with the product in that Dan is the owner. That's the part that matters, and that's the respect in which I'm saying it's basically the same situation.

    However, to be absolutely clear, I'm not suggesting that anybody should go after Dan. I'm saying it doesn't really matter in either case because of the way the products are presented.


    The opinion on KDH is irrelevant in my view, play the ball and not the man - what he stated in his video appears to be factually accurate (albeit with dramatization and a leading tone, but that's a different discussion). Again this comes down to the quote before (in reverse):

    Bigsby said:

    I suspect some of the arguments in this topic are based more on a love/loathing of Andertons than the actual situation.
    Just replace Andertons with KDH
    ...except that 99% of people only know about KDH from his innuendo-filled videos made after he's decided to take aim at somebody else for his own gain.

    It's totally OK to draw conclusions about that kind of behaviour, because he's made it his entire online persona. As I said in the post you quoted, the only explanation is that he picks a target and then looks for a way to make them look bad and give them no choice other than responding online which will make them look even worse 90% of the time, or not responding at all and making him look right.

    That's the way this has worked for over a decade in other genres on YouTube, and it's a transparent ploy used by creators who have nothing positive to add to the world but want to increase their view count. And yes, I take an extremely dim view of the kind of person who'd think that causing somebody else stress and ruining their reputation is an acceptable way to make money.
    <space for hire>
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 9reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Philly_QPhilly_Q Frets: 20197
    Philly_Q said:
    Philly_Q said:
    This'll get me shot down in flames, but I quite like KDH's band, and his guitar playing.
    You are KDH and ICM £5
    Nope.  I wouldn't mind being able to grow my hair that long (again) but it's almost certainly a bad idea at my age.  Although having said that, Geo. Lynch looked pretty damn cool with his wizard look a year or two ago.
    Do it, George looked like the Wycher which I haven’t watched but seen trailers 
    Unfortunately - or maybe fortunately, from some perspectives - I don't look much like George.  Apart from anything else, he looked cool because his hair is grey, mine isn't.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • OffsetOffset Frets: 9212
    It's totally OK to draw conclusions about that kind of behaviour, because he's made it his entire online persona. As I said in the post you quoted, the only explanation is that he picks a target and then looks for a way to make them look bad and give them no choice other than responding online which will make them look even worse 90% of the time, or not responding at all and making him look right.

    That's the way this has worked for over a decade in other genres on YouTube, and it's a transparent ploy used by creators who have nothing positive to add to the world but want to increase their view count. And yes, I take an extremely dim view of the kind of person who'd think that causing somebody else stress and ruining their reputation is an acceptable way to make money.
    ^^ Exactly this.  But the video did provide a valuable service as far as I'm concerned because it means I'll never waste my time watching this idiot again.
    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 2reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Philly_QPhilly_Q Frets: 20197
    Bigsby said:
    I suspect some of the arguments in this topic are based more on a love/loathing of Andertons than the actual situation.
    Just replace Andertons with KDH
    Both true.  It seems to me that everyone is commenting more on the basis of their preconceived opinions of Andertons and/or KDH than on anything to do with the video about the ownership of Victory amps. 

    What's surprised me most is the number of comments about Victory amps being shit.  I've never tried one, and I wouldn't know a good amp from a bad one to be really honest, but I've always been under the impression Cornford amps were well regarded and that Victory was (more or less) a continuation of Cornford.  You live and learn.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 2reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • That's fair, except that you can easily go through the entire purchase process on thegigrig.com and not ever encounter Dan's name or a reference to TPS - and most people won't care who owns the company they're buying from enough to go looking.



    That is demonstrably untrue - this is on the homepage... You'd almost have to be actively trying to avoid seeing him TBF.

    I think it's quite clearly a very different scenario to Victory
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 3reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • digitalscreamdigitalscream Frets: 25239
    edited August 2023
    That's fair, except that you can easily go through the entire purchase process on thegigrig.com and not ever encounter Dan's name or a reference to TPS - and most people won't care who owns the company they're buying from enough to go looking.



    That is demonstrably untrue - this is on the homepage... You'd almost have to be actively trying to avoid seeing him TBF.

    I think it's quite clearly a very different scenario to Victory
    *sigh*

    Sure, if you scroll down four pages (past the products that you were there for in the first place). As opposed to what most people will do when looking to buy something, which is to click "shop" (which is also the first result in Google, above the homepage, because it's a sponsored link).
    <space for hire>
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • robertyroberty Frets: 10231
    Hmmmmmmm mm. I quite like KDH's videos, 
    Well he does have strange fans

    Just food for thought: what about TPS and GigRig? Obviously everyone here knows that Dan owns GigRig, but if you were just perusing their board-building videos, it rarely comes up; it would look to the casual viewer like they just always use GigRig power supplies so it's an implied recommendation via product placement.

    That's basically the same criticism that's being levelled at Lee, yet nobody seems to have a problem with it at TPS.
    What I find toxic about that is they sort of push the myth that you need everything on isolated power. The power thing is overstated in their videos IMO. They might genuinely believe it, who knows

    I've spent far more time listening to pedal noise than would be considered healthy or normal. I found that a good PSU is crucial but from there you can daisy chain a bunch of basic, low-current stomp boxes without any perceptible difference in performance. Some pedals absolutely do need isolated power, and they will let you know about it
    3reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • LewyLewy Frets: 3795
    edited August 2023
    That's fair, except that you can easily go through the entire purchase process on thegigrig.com and not ever encounter Dan's name or a reference to TPS - and most people won't care who owns the company they're buying from enough to go looking.



    That is demonstrably untrue - this is on the homepage... You'd almost have to be actively trying to avoid seeing him TBF.

    I think it's quite clearly a very different scenario to Victory
    *sigh*

    Sure, if you scroll down four pages (past the products that you were there for in the first place). As opposed to what most people will do when looking to buy something, which is to click "shop" (which is also the first result in Google, above the homepage, because it's a sponsored link).
    Why does it matter that as a buyer you can go to the GigRig website and not see that Dan from TPS owns it? Doesn’t it only really matter if you’re watching TPS and Dan’s going on about how great GigRig is without disclosing that he owns it - they always seem very transparent about that on the show. 

    Sorry if I’ve misunderstood where you’re coming from.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 5reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • soma1975soma1975 Frets: 6304
     by posting videos about how good they are, and not declaring their involvement in the company this is a conflict of interest and the omission is unethical.
    Can confirm Andertons have never uploaded a video showing how good a Victory amp is. 
    My Trade Feedback Thread is here

    Been uploading old tracks I recorded ages ago and hopefully some new noodles here.
    4reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Power_FreakPower_Freak Frets: 90
    edited August 2023
    *sigh*

    Sure, if you scroll down four pages (past the products that you were there for in the first place). As opposed to what most people will do when looking to buy something, which is to click "shop" (which is also the first result in Google, above the homepage, because it's a sponsored link).

    How about the demo videos that are on each product page (and corresponding shop pages)? Surely you don't actually view this as the same as the Victory scenario really?

    EDIT: Apologies to Dan for the rather unflattering screen grab...


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Philly_QPhilly_Q Frets: 20197
    ^ Looks like he's nodding off watching one of his own TPS videos.
    7reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • TeleMasterTeleMaster Frets: 9175
    edited August 2023
    That's fair, except that you can easily go through the entire purchase process on thegigrig.com and not ever encounter Dan's name or a reference to TPS - and most people won't care who owns the company they're buying from enough to go looking.



    That is demonstrably untrue - this is on the homepage... You'd almost have to be actively trying to avoid seeing him TBF.

    I think it's quite clearly a very different scenario to Victory
    Completely and utterly different. 

    I also don't think that people are looking at this objectively because they like one party and dislike the other. It's fairly obvious the approach to the whole Victory thing raised some important questions about the ethical position of it all, and the impartiality of the video comparisons, blindfold tests etc which Lee has now acknowledged and explained in a satisfactory way and essentially apologised for it. Everything has been explained, lessons have been learned and there isn't any bad blood between KDH and Lee so that's it really, isn't it. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 7reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • soma1975soma1975 Frets: 6304
    I hate everyone involved equally but Lee has still done nothing wrong. 
    My Trade Feedback Thread is here

    Been uploading old tracks I recorded ages ago and hopefully some new noodles here.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 4reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • SassafrasSassafras Frets: 30023
    Isn't life too short to waste watching his cringey whingy whining vids?
    I watched a few minutes of one ages ago, his supercilious pompous presentation put me right off.
    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 4reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.