Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Your life will improve when you realise it’s better to be alone than chase people who do not really care about you. Saying YES to happiness means learning to say NO to things and people that stress you out.
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
is it crazy how saying sentences backwards creates backwards sentences saying how crazy it is?
Hardly the most controversial opinion in the world even if he is wrong.
Incidentally watching Micheal Owen getting schooled on a goal keeping error by Rachel Brown-Finnis last night was brilliant.
https://news.sky.com/story/kevin-keegan-says-he-doesnt-like-lady-footballers-talking-about-england-mens-team-12977463
He says this:
I think that's a more reasonable statement. He's saying that a female England player can't really have a grasp on what it's like to be in the position of a male England player in a big match. I think he does harbour a misogynistic attitude though, because he says he doesn't want to hear those opinions. That's not good in my book.
The presentation team is - typically - led by a female pitch-side with a couple of retired (male) footballers to give the opinions, etc, with a similar set-up in the studio.
My observation is that the female presenters are, without exception, of "above average attractiveness".
Now, they can read the script (out loud), know where the camera is, and can hold a microphone, so they're not in front of the camera *purely* on the basis of their looks. But given that - I'm assuming - the watching audience is predominantly male, I wonder when we'll see some female presenters that fall below that average level.
None of the cricket ones are as bad as Michael Vaughan though.
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder
My trading feedback - I'm a good egg
noted with regards presenters.. I was referring to pundits and I think Kev was too...
That's how I interpret his views.. but it's a dangerous stance these days
is it crazy how saying sentences backwards creates backwards sentences saying how crazy it is?
As far I know, none of these women have been in the ring with Golovkin or Canelo yet they still seem to know what's going on.
I have no problem with women talking about football, to be honest I like it. Also I don't care in the least if they are attractive or not, I just like interesting opinions or worthwhile analysis.
Women players don't really understand when it's advantageous to fall over in apparent agony looking for a free kick or penalty.
I suspect to some men it'll always be just some girls having a kickabout, just like plucky little Serena having a bit of a go at tennis, bless her.
However... it's merely clumsy and a bit dumb and hardly worth the opprobrium and shrieks of outrage it seems to be attracting. In truth it's no worse than I'd expect from him. His crimes against tonsorial styling are far more serious.
Someone of a bygone era has expressed a view, an opinion, that is not consistent with current day accepted/expected (by some) views or opinions. It is simply not acceptable.
He must submit himself for re-programming or be silenced.
It's all getting a bit 1984 ... be careful what you say, be careful what you think, be careful what others might think you're going to say ...
Years ago he was bashed up in a lay-by in his car and the Sun had the real story why on the press ready to print until it got pulled.
They did actually print off a few but most of those were destroyed.
Im surprised that story has never come out in this day of every one telling historical stuff.
The women's World Cup final was indeed a big game, but it's different to England vs Scotland in the men's game - not because they're men, but because of the history and the rivalry level of interest in terms of advertising, sponsorship, business, TV coverage etc. it just isn't on the same magnitude. That's not to say "women aren't as good or as relevant as men" it's to say "it's very difficult for anyone to have a qualified valuable opinion if they haven't been on that stage themselves".
No wonder we are in the state we are in as a country when people believe what they read, and even worse don’t actually read the article.