Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
That's one of the more positive aspects of the Influencer phenomenon for me, in some aspects there is a lot greater transparency and democratisation of the processes involved, and more scope for individual influencers to pioneer their own strategies of monetisation, which in turns affects the originality of advertainment content that they can produce.
For me I think it's wise to maintain cynicism in order to aim for as much objectivity as possible, while also leaning into it and enjoying it for the entertainment / interesting content that it is.
I now find video reviews can be helpful for learning more about the features and quirks – not sound – of certain kit.
I am not interested in why folks love stuff they've got for free, I am interested in why I might hate it.
Jon
My trading feedback: https://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/210335/yorkie
Trogly (love him or hate him) takes the guitars to bits and does neck measurements etc, so it's all useful factual information. Colin from The Guitaristas does something very similar. Phil McKnight doesn't necessarily measure the necks or anything, but I trust his opinions. Even retailers' channels are useful for confirming specs.
At no point would I be influenced by the playing demos, since the thing, whatever it is, is going to sound nothing like that when I play it.
PMcK is probably the most knowledgeable and has the best presentational style for me; DB has a few interesting guitars from time to time although is a bit bland; and Trogly, whilst sometimes irritating and an amusingly poor player is also entertaining and obviously makes a pretty good living out of what he does, so kudos to him.
I've never bought anything based directly on any of their reviews.
Lots of ‘influence’ on YT; but some people I would never be influenced by…
Mary Spender, Chappers, Leon Todd etc
Personally, I think the more paid demo stuff on a channel, the less connected to the gear they're likely to be? The stuff I've found I really want to make videos about has often been gear I've bought specifically because I was skeptical about a lot of the "influencer" type videos like Sire or Prs dgt SE.
I have considered doing my own channel geared towards more punkish type of music as I feel most guitar stuff falls into the blues, country, 80s rock then full on metal stuff and leave a huge chunk out for stuff like 90s to 2000s punk rock and rock in general even though that was a massive era for music. Occasionally you get the video like dagen out of pmt going sound like greenday, which I'll be 100% honest I can't stand the guys videos as everything is awesome and knowing him personally he never deviates playing wise and knowledge wise put of 80s cock rock, so him giving advice on genres he knows nothing about feels like a PE teacher, teaching physics.
Been uploading old tracks I recorded ages ago and hopefully some new noodles here.
Paid gear demonstrators like Pete Thorn are a very different thing and a noble profession.
There is a blurring of the lines with a lot of people who act as though they are the former when in fact they are the latter, but just dishonest about it.
Been uploading old tracks I recorded ages ago and hopefully some new noodles here.
See also Landlord fx
I’m not intentionally arguing a Welsh singer pretending to be Italian is a more successful influencer than a great guitarist. But I guess objectively he would be
No doubt the product is more valuable emotionally when the focus is the music, not the music equipment. But it’s not necessarily free from projecting an aspirational image, or free from any form of business interest/sponsorship.
Social media based Influencer as a career path didn’t exist for a lot of the history of recorded music to be fair. We can’t know if past guitar heroes would or wouldn’t have chosen it as a career path because it wasn’t an option. I find it interesting to think about anyway.
I agree people should be open and honest about their ties. Especially because younger/less experienced guitarists might not be able to tell for themselves
btw I often find multi quoting on phones goes wonky for me so it was easier to triple reply
I've reviewed gear, mostly studio equipment, but way back I was a writer for Australian Guitar Magazine.
You don't get to keep the stuff.
You can sometimes buy it, but you don't get it for free.
It is probably easy for punters to be cynical about this but as a reviewer my integrity and credibility are more important than getting something for free.
If you fuck that up once you'd never work again and no one would believe a thing you say.
And for what?
Think about it.
You are reviewing a product and you think it sucks... why would you say it was good in order to keep something you don't like?
I've also never been pressured to say something specific about a product by the manufacturer or by my employer.
It just wouldn't happen.
In terms of being 'a name', you are pretty anonymous as a reviewer.
I've done a couple of deals on Reverb or eBay where people have asked me if I was 'James Richmond from Production Expert' but that is partly because the industry is pretty small in the UK and partly because Production Expert are really great at SEO.
If I search my own name I find the stuff I've done for PE way above anything else.
I did Pro Tools certification this week and the two other people certifying use that site as their primary reference for technical information relating to audio production.
They knew the site but they didn't know me, even though they had both read several of my articles.
That is pretty much how it goes, which suits me just fine.
One of the reasons I am a reviewer and not a Youtuber is being a Youtuber is *very* time consuming.
I want to make music more than I want to be internet famous.
The yoke of having to constantly make content to keep people clicking sounds like the opposite of fun.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
Auto-Bounce by Tom Salta
Dreamhost Web Hosting
I find them helpful for modulation and time based effect pedals (honourable mention to Jay Leonard J). I've learnt that I won't get the same drive tones though, because there are too many other variables at play.
Not really.
Watch the parking meters
There's a thread about endorsements, but I guess you could have a third one about buying gear because someone you like/admire uses it, whether they officially endorse it or not.
https://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/253193/do-you-buy-gear-because-of-endorsements/p1