Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
(1) You can actually focus on making creative music. You are undistracted.
(2) You know your instrument is good, so you also know that any sound you make which isn't good is your fault! No tail chasing, no "is it the guitar or is it me?" - if it sounds bad, lift your game.
Note that a good musician can overcome limitations. If you are up to scratch and something goes wrong, you will make it work anyway. This is what you have to do when you break a string, or the singer comes in two bars early, or the foldback system cracks the sads, or your pickup switch fails and you are stuck on bridge only, or the drummer has had too much to drink - you use your experience and skill to make the best of it and somehow salvage a decent set. But you don't do that rescue-mode stuff unless you actually have an unexpected problem. And once you've got through the immediate problem, you fix it - change your strings, work things over in the practice room, fix the foldback, have your guitar repaired, get a new drummer. Whatever it takes.
But this guitar - is it played often OR (because of "poor" tone) rarely?
I'm sure you can see what I'm getting at here.
When I got pro quality guitars and amps, my playing improved rapidly
It was a decision I never regretted & still play that guitar daily.
As I got older & could afford it I bought a better guitar. Love them both, play them both. Don't feel the need for more guitars (yet). That's probably because I wouldn't sound any different on anything else- by which I mean this is as good as it's going to get!!
My two hobbies are wildlife photography and guitar. In each case I make it a rule to spend whatever it takes to know that, no matter what is wrong with the picture or the song, it isn't the result of second-rate equipment. Anything wrong with either one is 100% down to me. That is a powerful motivation, and provides clarity of thought.
I'm quite ruthless about that. I'm basically a miser. I drive a 20-year-old car, wear shirts I bought at the op shop for $2 until the collars are worn all the way through, bake my own bread (well), cut my own hair (badly) ... but guitars and camera lenses, I reckon spend whatever it takes.
I certainly sound better since I bought pro-quality guitars
(OK, you can't measure quality in $ or £ - sometimes a £1000 instrument plays better than one worth twice that. But generally speaking you can usually expect a certain quality at a certain price point. So I'll use price as a rough-enough-is-good-enough proxy for quality.)
I reckon I can sound at my very best on my (expensive) WA May. Sure. If I get it right on the day. But I can sound near enough as makes no difference to just as good on the SRS-60 which cost a quarter as much. OK, I enjoy the May and I'll buy another similar-but-different Custom Shop Maton one of these days, but from the point of view of @Soupman's question "Will that improve me as a musician?" ... well, probably not. I reckon you need ONE quality instrument to bring out your ability. Let's say a £1500 acoustic, give or take. Anything past that level you do because you want to, not because you need to.
(now I know now that in Spanish/ classical technique there are names for different ways of plucking and that also you can go too far, and sometimes you want a bit of difference, but it was a great lesson