Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
@CavemanGrogg I know of people in the States who pay outrageous Reverb prices to buy Matons and Cole Clarks in Australia and ship them over - they pay maybe 10% extra over the standard Australian price, and pay freight, and pay state taxes and duties and insurance, and still wind up hundreds of dollars better off than they would be buying at US prices. And I know Australians who buy Gibsons in the USA and ship them here because the Gibson Australia are even more dedicated to outrageous markups than that the UK Martin mob. (And I've heard one or two tales of very shonky service too.)
One more thing. You have to wonder whether a lot of the benefit of marking up your overseas sales to the max and keeping home-market prices low is that you can take most of your profit wherever is most convenient to you. For example, Gibtin Music could manufacture in Chicago, sell to Gibtin Distribution Inc (Ireland), and have Gibtin (UK) buy from Ireland with the profit being taken in whichever jurisdiction has the lowest corporate tax rate.
I've wondered about that too often, especially when you start adding ''Asian'' guitars - guitars made by an Asian brand or for the Asian market, to that list. But then it's not unusual for products to be more expensive in their native country than they are overseas, especially with food. Whisky is more expensive in Scotland than in any bottle shop in Australia, and Bundy is quite a bit cheaper here than it is in Australia. Then you have to wonder is their internal market large enough to support the company and it's competitors. It wouldn't surprise me if brands like Martin rotate prices, for so many years the people in ''X'' market are being squeezed to lower their prices in markets ''Y'' and ''Z'', when their sales drop to a level deemed to be too low in market ''X'', they see a drop in prices, but market ''Y'' gets squeezed to make up for the money they where making in market ''X'' before they lowered their prices in that market. I've noticed this pricing rotation happen in the past with Gibson, but that was during turbulant times for the company when there was a serious risk of them going bankrupt, it was a great time to be in the market for Gibsons in the UK, you could easily buy them for between 30% to 60% lower than they could be purchased in America at the same time for, American where buying and importing them from UK dealers.
I think one thing not really demonstrated is it is not just a straight-up charge or tax in foreign markets.
As far as I am aware Martin still uses a distributor in the UK and probably in Australia as a distributor of non-guitar products just about every line has been dramatically impacted by shipping component costs etc. Mahogany and Rosewood ebony does not grow local to Pennsylvania so a lot of their core woods will have had serious cost increases. Their UK distributor will be looking to make a living paying people to unload containers check delivery pay reps etc.
Also, the cost of doing business is high in the UK Rates power property etc.
In the US Martin are their own distributor supplying dealers direct and handling warranty in-house.
In fairness, I also do business in and around Nazareth and a lot of the guys I work with have family and friends who are working at Martin many are multi-generational employees and Martin is spoken about as a good employer health care etc, that many US companies run roughshod over. That in this day and age of people giving half a bowl of rice per day in some harsh factory conditions in the latest remote offshore location is to be commended. Especially as those companies quickly move on when the costs start to rise.
There is obviously a certain amount of brand tax and that is normal but it's not the big figure people think as Martin has plenty of competition in the acoustic guitar market not least of all Taylor.
On the distribution side, I think it was quite telling a few years ago when PRS bought out his distributor and worked with him to set up their European distribution hub he commented for the first time in years we might actually make some money in UK and Europe.
I as much as the next man likes a good bargain and there are so many great options in the guitar world these days with good guitars to fit everyone's budget unfortunately products like Martin and other US brands can only go so far to reduce costs. They can't just pickup the brand and start making it in Asia.
I think his/her example of employees in other jurisdictions working for 'half a bowl of rice a day' is exaggerated - or perhaps tongue in cheek - in which case I agree in principle.
There is also the point of ethical resourcing of wood. This might not be a priority outside of US, UK, Europe and has cost implications.
So that's all counterargument to OP (me!).
But my original point, that Martin's are getting a tad costly in the UK remains valid. They've never been cheap. But they're moving towards unaffordable for the enthusiastic player with a bit of hard-earned cash to splash.
What can be done about that? Perhaps nothing. Circumstances change.
I wish Martin well. They make great guitars.
In the UK, I think it is 2%. (Used to be 3.2% pre-Brexit, but of course zero for EU-manufactured goods.) In Australia it can be 5% (imports from the few countries we don't have a free trade agreement with) but is usually zero. In the USA it is either zero (goods made in Canada, Mexico, Australia, and some other places I'm not up to speed on) or 8.7% (everywhere else).
Countries from which the UK excessive markup (what I called "import tax") is lowest would very likely be Japan and anywhere in Europe. (I didn't check the prices of made-in-Japan guitars this time, but last time they were practically identical in the US, the UK, and Australia so long as you allow for local taxes such as the 20% UK VAT, the 10% Australian GST, or the variable state sales tax in the USA.
I have an Atkin and know how great they are. But am after a specific Martin. In any case, whilst I do believe you get more value for money with an Atkin, they’re not cheap either. Even the second hand market, where you could get great deals until recently, prices are only going up. But it’s obviously happening across the board.
The Essential D is only about £200 more than a D18. I know which one I'd rather have.
I think I misread your earlier post - I thought you were suggesting Atkin was a cheaper alternative to a Martin, which as you say it generally isn’t (or not by much).
Sweet Lord - £5500... that's the same cost as Collings etc (and only $3300 in USA)
My luthier does a lot of neck rests on Martins, bindings too. I read a guy on a Martin forum saying that neck resets are to be expected. Err what!? Tell you what, though - I am lusting after that guitar and I know I shouldn't.
My YouTube Channel