Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
The new Martins all seem to be 1 3/4" nut width, rather than the 1 11/16" that your Eastman has. I've got an older Martin HD28V in 1 11/16" (which I'm half tempted to sell). Make sure you are comfortable with the nut width before getting one.
I think the newer Martins do have the "forward shifted" bracing that you used to only get on the higher end vintage series guitars, so they should sound good.
Whether a Martin will sound significantly better than the Eastman I don't know. I've got a Stonebridge branded Furch OM that I prefer to the expensive Martin Clapton Signature OOO that I had before it.
As for nut widths and neck profiles, you have to get it in your hand - width, string spacing, neck shape - it all adds up to a whole.
Same goes for bracing - for all the "forward shifted is better and like the old ones" I ended up with a rearward shifted one of all things.
Try and get somewhere they have lots to choose from - make a day of it. :-)
It's a lot more responsive. It's basically pre-war style. Sometime in the 1940s, Martin moved the bracing an inch or so, and beefed it up. I think this was because people were putting heavy strings on the guitars to try to get enough volume acoustically to play with other instruments, and the tops were bellying up.
From the 1940s until recently, the standard series Martins had the beefed up bracing. I think the D18 went back to forward shifted bracing around 2012, and the D28 a bit later. You would need to check the individual model specs to be certain.
A 15 year old D28 without the forward shifted bracing will probably sound nice if you are willing to put 13 gauge strings on it, but if you don't want to shred your fingers, then the forwards shifted guitars will sound a lot better. The tops are a lot more responsive, and will work much better with lighter strings. They also seem to be more dynamic and responsive if you aren't strumming full on all the time.
When I bought my HD28V, I actually played some early 70s Martin D28s that were a similar price. The new guitar knocked spots off of them tonally. That's not just the bracing. Martin changed the bridge plate material around 1968, and it stayed that way until around 1988. That is not regarded as a good era for Martin.
The HD28 is way louder than the D. Sounds like D28 through an amp
You can get rear shifted scalloped by ordering a D28 1941 authentic
open to corrections here
Bloody mine field
I had a 2015 (pre-reimagined) D28 and now have a 2018 HD28 (reimagined)
The new HD28 has forward shifted and scalloped bracing with aging toner on the top, cream coloured (rather than white) binding and 1 3/4" nut width with Modified Low Oval neck profile. The 2015 D28 had the 1 11/16th nut width and a different fuller neck profile. (can't remember what it was called)
My HD28 is now just over a year old, the matte finish on the neck has worn to a silky gloss and it sounds better than it did when I got it. The scalloped bracing gives more low end thump and volume that the D28 had with it's non scalloped bracing.
The forward shiting is interesting, it makes the guitar livelier and adds a sparkle to the top end of the tone, which can sound a bit too zingy with some strings when they are new. You don't need to dig in so hard to get volume compared to playing the older D28. I use the .013 Martin Lifespan strings and they are perfect for me delivering that woody bluegrass mid-range from the wound strings but retaining enough zing for the high strings.
I can't see any reason to move the new HD28 on and it is sounding better wth age. The top looks better as well after a year as even with the aging toner the grain is now darkering in places so variations in the wood pattern are coming through nicely (it was a bit of a plain looking yellowy wash when I got it but ambient UV is working it's magic.
I did prefer the 1 11/16th nut width and neck profile of the older D28 though but have adjusted.
Chris Martin (not Coldplay!) says that when you get a new Martin guitar that day 1 is the worst it will sound and it will only get better with age. I can vouch for that as both the D's I've owned sounded noticable better after 1 year of hanging on the wall and playing.
As said above, If I was buying, I would go to Peach guitars, get a coffee and play as many as I could and let my ears decide on which particular flavour and model to take home.
I've got 12s on my Eastman E8D, which is basically their take on an HD28, because I'm a girly man but also because it means I can play it fingerstyle easily and still get decent bass and strumming volume with a pick. I guess it depends what you're mostly using it for - you get a slightly beefier strum with 13s, but the bracing on that should mean you don't necessarily need them to get the top moving. On the other hand, if you've got better fingerstyle technique than me, or play mostly with a pick, then you might not need lighter strings for that.
I've stuck with Martin Authentic 13 on mine - only reason is that I fell in love with the sound on day 1 and don't want anything to change
Check out my YouTube channel for videos of luthier-built and vintage guitars!
Luthier Stories - My series of interviews with some of the world's greatest guitar makers
The HD28 looks terrific BTW. : >