Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Personally, I can't remember buying any amp because of a certain track. A certain style would be part of it though
Initially for me in the 80s it was "what's for sale I the local shop that I can afford that everyone seems happy with and reviews are good" This did not work well for me really
Then in the 90s "what does my amp guru have for sale or recommend, or looks like a good deal". That worked better
Since 2006 for me it's been "what are the most highly regarded amps in the top 20 lists, etc, and variations of them, and where can I get them since the local shop usually doesn't sell them, and the maker doesn't make them anymore"
So within the recent purchase strategy, I got Dumble and trainwreck, and JTM45 clones, etc. and original modern boutiques. Eventually after chopping and changing, I now have amps I really think suit me the best
The museum/art collector prices for Dumbles and Trainwrecks are the same issue as the 1959 LP. These are investment/collector prices, not based on value as an instrument. is an old strat or LP really worth £100k, £300k, etc?
Dumbles appear on a lot of famous tracks AFAIK, Trainwrecks very few, but look at who the makers sold to.
Not sure if you also mean brands like Matchless and Two rock, etc - but the fact that highly respected players use them would influence many to try them, who else would you trust? A magazine review from a mag full of gear adverts is not as good (as discussed in this forum recently). If your financially comfortable favourite player uses a guitar / amp / pickup for years - to me it's the best indication that something is at least worth a try out
If you've got the money and you can't have it, because of rarity, it's going to make you and others (with money) want it more, then the prices spiral. Then to justify the prices, it adopts the "emperors new clothes" mystique and sheen.
(this sums up Mr. Dumble's whole marketing strategy, though whether he was clever or just barking is open to debate)
Eventually as a person you get through Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and realise .... it's all in the fingers!
A lot of the readily available booteeks, such as Dr Z, Matchless, Carr, Lazy J, Two Rock etc, mearly get you back to what amps were like back in the day (with modern refinments) IMO. i.e. obsessively designed, hand wired, built in either UK or USA to last a lifetime.
That's just the cost of doing it that way.
You are definately into diminishing returns compared to a far east manufactured PCB equivelant, but the difference is there - everyone who plays through my Carr compliments it, it's a stunning amp.
Going the next level to Trainwrek, Dumble etc and excessive pricing that comes with it, I think you're into equivelant of hi-end Hi Fi and the fairly dust (and wife-loss) that goes with it.
Sadly (or not), I find that most amps these days are capable of decent tone and it's hard to separate them on sound alone. I use reviews from techs for reliability to help me decide, but from a tone perspective, I have to try before I buy.
Trainwreck OTOH is a different matter. There aren't going to be anymore, not tuned by KF anyway.
@stickyfiddle, what they are worth is determined by what someone will pay, whether you agree or not. You can't argue with an opinion, if JB says he wants one for 'his' sound then no-one can say he's wrong. He paid closer to £70k I think.
They DO sound different and the construction is superb, it's boutique/top quality components at the end of the day which I think justifies the price. And I agree with what @dindude said, it's a way to get back to how amps were originally made, albeit with modern construction and reliability and safety.
It is a bit of a double edged sword though as, once I got used to that sound, I really struggle to go back to a 'production' amp these days, they just don't have the 'sparkle'.
You do end up trying to better the best (as only a GAS addict will) and so I moved over to BadCat, which I personally prefer over Matchless...
....Then once you have your Class A, EL84 tone sorted, you seek out the best boutique Tweed sound you can, hence finding Lazy J!
And I dare say it'll continue...!
(formerly miserneil)
I do get how good some of these amps are, I have played, Badcat, Matchless, Carr etc and all have been superb amps, but no better tone than some of the old Marshalls Voxes and Fenders I have had and used. Most of these amps are high quality amps that are hand wired using best components, similar to What Marshall and the rest used to do before rising costs forced them to cheapen builds and cut costs etc.
But the Dumble and Trainwrecks are ridiculously overpriced due to hype more than quality, not that they are not great amps far from it. But I do wonder if you have a great guitarist with great gear he is gonna sound great, but with a Dumble is he gonna sound any better ? if not, why not cause it costs so much more than any other amp out there.
Seriously, though, I mean I've never tried a dumble either so they may well be fantastic. And Sporky makes a good point in that if you have tons of money, £50k probably isn't that much (and rarity means that there are few enough that rich people can push the prices way up, much like with vintage 1959 les paul standards).
I can't help but think hype plays a part, too, though.
Here's my theory:
Left to us Brits, these things (Dumbles and TWs) wouldn't have the value that they do in the US. We don't 'do amps' over here in the same way they 'do amps' in the US. There's a much smaller market for high end amps here, as compared with high end guitars. I'm generalising of course, but I'd say the interest in that kind of sound amongst the typical UK guitar player is far lower. Even amongst the membership of this board, which IMO is a self-selecting and untypical group. In contrast look at the number of small amp companies in the US....there's thousands of them!
My theory as to why is to do with predominant musical styles, and the equipment needed for them, creating a culture in America of guitar playing that regards amps as vital tone shapers, part of the instrument. We seem to be a lot more 'rock' over here, less interested in the subtleties of various different 'not-quite-clean' sounds and such.
When I think of a typical British guitar player, he's a guy playing classic rock in a pub, or playing indie with lots of effects and a Jag, or a younger guy with a beard playing drop-tuned metal.....the majority of my repair customers will fit into a category like this. (Generalising and stereotyping, but go with it).
I'm sure the septics have many of the above, but I'm guessing they also have many more country and blues players, and fans of the guys who did use TW and Dumble amps.
Representative of this difference, is the OPs statement that he couldn't think of a classic hit done on one of these amps; plenty of great recordings were done on them, and on a US forum, those recordings would have been well known and mentioned. In fact I've seen that exact question come up on TGP, and the list is surprisingly long but it's stuff that is less popular over here.
In short: If your hero played a Marshall, then that's what you want. If he uses a Dumble (or Two Rock or Fuchs or Bludotone etc etc), then only a D-style amp will do. There's enough demand, as JPF said, worldwide to drive up the price of those amps, as well as the similar sounding amps still made today. As a Brit, if you want one of these, you're going to have to pay US prices in today's global marketplace.
I think we're the same about guitars too in the UK - most people are happy with semi-pro guitars here. The network of small-shop acoustic builders in particular over in the USA is doing amazing things, and getting plenty of sales. Our best luthiers find it hard to find buyers, everyone just wants a Taylor. Most people don't even know the top USA boutique acoustic brand names
Mind you, unlike plenty of other things, the Americans did invent steel strung guitars, electrics, lap steels, amps, etc. so they have grown up with the best kit for sale - good kit was pretty rare here until recently. The exception to this is that everyone still looks to Spain firstly for top classicals, but we don't have the long-term history in any category here (other than Vox and Marshall making stunning designs before going off onto something new), and you are right, there is a (to me inexplicable) "you should make do with cheap gear, even if you have the money to buy better" attitude that is popular in the UK
As I've said to Martin, I can't believe that people will go into Dawsons or PMT, etc., buy Gibsons, USA Fenders, PRSs, then run them through their single, much cheaper amp. I think a ratio of one amp for every 2 guitars is a good idea, spending about the same on an amp as on a guitar. I have certainly noticed the benefit from adopting this approach.
The rare museum pieces for $60k are just for investment or very rich guys. If you are worth $20 million, and drive cars costing £200k, who cares if an amp is £50k, you can always sell it on with your celeb vibe added.
More interesting are the upmarket boutique models in production. As you say, the USA buyers seem keen to buy every variation of tone that can help build the individual sounds people want. This seems to be the correct approach if you approach this as a serious player looking for your own sound.
Most people here seem to buy the same amps as each other, then keep changing their pickups, or spending a fortune on pedals to change the way the amp sounds. I can't see the shops complaining about that