Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
http://www.frailers.com/acoustic-guitars/martin-guitars/martin-d35-acoustic-guitar-876226633.html
Their pricing tends to be very reasonable for a retailer.
I seem to remember that in the early '70s that there were fairly significant intonation issues on some guitars, due to incorrectly placed bridges. I can't remember the source of this info - I'm sure someone else will confirm - or correct me.
Martin (much like Rickenbacker) has never really had an accepted 'bad' period - which is not meant to suggest that every guitar they have produced is a stunner - it's just that any given year can (and has) yielded great instruments.
There's no reason why (say) a mid-90s D28 won't be as good (or better) than an early '70s one.
When I went shopping for a nice dreadnought around 10 years ago I tried a few early 70s D28s. The better modern guitars sounded a lot better than any of them and I ended up buying an HD28V. I'd look out for a second hand HD28V - it would be around the same price and would probably be a much better guitar.
You might pick up a second hand Santa Cruz for similar money as well if you are not bothered about the Martin name on the headstock.