Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
At the actual price, it's an easy decision.
I also have a struggling bank balance.
So "no" on all counts.
The original album and live tracks from various other albums is more than enough.
I've got the remastered version from the 90s (I think) with some bonus tracks, and that seems like enough.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
I've heard a few tunes off the NY version and also the takes with Leslie West on lead but these longer versions have exposed some edits in the 90s releases.
Edit: I listened to the next few discs his morning on the way in - mainly alternate mixes/versions with some singles and b-sides. The Young Vic Apr '71 live versions are worth listening to. There's some interesting between song chat about remembering the chords/arrangements and discouraging the crowd from distracting them (dancing mainly). There are also some staples from the live set to keep the kids engaged, I assume.
I think it's good so far but it may benefit listeners to concentrate on one or two discs as it's dead easy to skip over things when there's so much on offer.
Who's Next is a tight, cohesive little album.
The rest of this is certainly for completists.
This has been around for a while. I was also wrong about the unedited version. It isn't isn't new for this release.
http://www.richieunterberger.com/whoexc1.html - some interesting background here.