Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
https://i.imgur.com/wLerTz5.jpg
I’ve gone for Indian Rosewood back and sides with a European Spruce top. There are good arguments for mahogany but I would always regret not going for rosewood. After discussing the intended use (I want to do more fingerpicking, and I have a dread if I want to bash out loud open chords), it seemed that European Spruce would be a good choice rather than Sitka. I initially thought of doing something different aesthetically, but have decided for a more traditional look for the headstock, bridge etc., although I have time to change my mind.Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
It speaks volumes that the interviewer returned a few weeks later to order a build from Richard. Good luck to him.
I am confident you won't be disappointed with the result! Now just the wait! Any timescale yet?
Richard builds all the guitars himself (there were at least two in the workshop when I visited) so there will be a wait of a few months before he starts on mine. But I have bagged a place in the queue!
I used to think that one day I would buy myself a Martin, but I played a Meyrick and a HD28 back to back in a shop a few months ago and the decision was made.
The whole experience of having a guitar built is different to just buying one from a shop. Even setting the merits of the instrument you end up with aside, it's worth doing just for its own sake.
PS Cedar tops are divine. (But there is nothing remotely wrong with European Spruce. Lovely stuff.)