Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Still... astonishing spec for the money and as you say @guitartango getting easily towards the spec where you could use one as a daily web browsing/media/wasting time on TFB machine with a nice cheap monitor.
I'm a big supporter of cheap computing for everyone - in an age where people are struggling to heat and eat, and yet PC access is essential for work, school and accessing essential services, the Pi and it's kin have another purpose beyond letting enthusiasts open their curtains from their armchairs.
The limited RAM is a serious problem (8GB doesn't go very far these days), as is the very limited CPU (this is probably nearly on par with the lowest spec modern Celerons), and then we have to talk about I/O - just two USB 3.0 ports kinda sucks. Especially when one of those will have to be for storage (the PCIE "slot" is only PCIE 2.0 1x, which means 500MB/s - not even enough for a SATA SSD).
EDIT: Apparently it can actually do PCIE 3.0 1x, or 1GB/s, but it's not certified for that and thus may not be reliable
ARM CPUs are capable of really serious performance, but just not these ARM CPUs - and even with Apple's Mx silicon, what really makes them useful are the hardware accelerators for very specific use cases.
When you can pick up a 6th-7th gen I5 or i7 NUC second hand for not much more than this with expandable memory, storage and proper I/O, the Pi isn't really a contender for a daily in my opinion.
'Daily driver' means different things to different people I guess.
I have half a dozen Pi's and more Arduinos that I use in custom electronic instruments that I've built that interact with Max.
I also have one Pi4 as a Homebridge server/Pi Hole.
Using a Pi as an every day computer would be difficult as my 'daily' needs are Pro Tools, Logic Pro, Nuendo etc.
Due to Logic that means... a Mac.
If it wasn't for that then I'd be able to run a PC as my main machine, instead of something I just game on, or use for certain audio apps that don't exist on Mac (Acid Pro) or my labelling software.
I have a 10th Gen Nuc here that I use for a few things (Patch Cad especially) but, even using an expansion chassis for Thunderbolt, it is still very limited in terms of IO.
If I was PC only then I wouldn't want to have to move to a different computer just to use Pro Tools or play a game, so the NUC isn't going to work for me.
If it was just admin, networking, web etc then it wouldn't be a problem but that is such a small part of my day.
In terms of running costs, the Mac Studio sips power, I haven't compared it to a NUC but maybe I should.
The Pihole costs pennies to run.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
Auto-Bounce by Tom Salta
Dreamhost Web Hosting
For me, my 7th-gen i7 Chromebook is as low as I'd want to go for basic browsing and such - it does chug very occasionally, and I can't imagine that the Pi 5 is going to be anywhere close to matching that level of performance. Obviously it's a fanless mobile CPU rather than a desktop unit, but that's pretty much an apples-to-apples comparison with the kind of processor in these SBCs.
The Pi has always sat in a weird spot for me - too complex for basic automation stuff, but not powerful enough for the more complex bits. I'm currently considering building an automation system with multiple steppers and sensors (analogue and digital), and honestly...I can't even use a Pi for that because of the non-existent analogue I/O. I'd rather use a bunch of Pi Pico W boards and coordinate them over the network from a more full-fledged like my desktop or home server.
That said, if the Pi 5 can be persuaded to boot properly fast, then I might use one for the digital OBD II dash project that's been burbling around in my mind for the last couple of years (driving an ancient MG, you want as much information as to what's going on in the engine as you can get).
However, that's clearly a sweet spot for a lot of people with different applications from mine.
It was the only one I could buy at the time, normally I'd have gone for the regular Pi.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B08Q5YFM9C
When Pi can do PCIE 4.0 with onboard NVME I'd probably have a lot more use for one.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com
Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Me: https://www.jamesrichmond.com
Auto-Bounce by Tom Salta
Dreamhost Web Hosting
Once you've got a case, mouse, keyboard etc then I would think any crappy old secondhand laptop would be better and probably cheaper.
The earlier ones were especially annoying as virtually any software you wanted had to be compiled from source with bespoke build settings because it had a slightly weird architecture.
2 x 500gb microSD cards hold the content. I physically move it around the house to plug into the main hifi or my study mini, or the bedroom “radio”, or the kitchen area, or my workshop, or the cabin, or …
Plus it’s easy to pack for holiday trips (with the Bose mini speaker).
I could use NAS over the Wi-Fi, but that doesn’t reach the last 2 places, takes longer to boot and has a less simple UI. So I just pick up the pi4 case and plug it in wherever it’s needed. NAS serves as backup.
Seemed like a good option for that use case (and lots of others), but I see it as that sort of niche hobby opti9n rather than a do-it-all / do-anything alternative to “proper” PCs (whatever OS).
I suppose the thing that the Pi 5 is capable of that previous units couldn't do is being a NAS. The single-lane PCIE might be capable of running a SAS card, and if it can run one at PCIE 3.0 speeds then you might be able to get some reasonable performance out of a RAID array. Then run a 2.5Gbe or 5Gbe network dongle off one of the USB 3.0 ports, and...yeah, I can see how that'd do a reasonably decent job of it. If, of course, the CPU can keep up.
From my personal perspective, that could even potentially be a low-power replacement for my current 12-core Xeon server, which is running 5 x 1.6TB SSDs in ZFS, along with Minecraft and media servers - my network's only 2.5Gbe, so it only needs to be able to reliably hit 300MB/s over the network...depends entirely on whether the CPU's up to the job, though.