UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45
Friedman Head & 'Metal' Pedal OR Engl Head & Friedman Pedal
What's Hot
So long story short, I'm looking to buy a valve head that combines my love of metal and Marshall tones. Think Black Album, Appetite For Destruction & Highway to Hell.
To achieve this - and without breaking the bank - I'm looking for advice on whether it would be best to buy a Friedman amp for the Marshall tones combined with a 'metal' pedal for the metal tones, or get a Engl Fireball 25 and use a Friedman Dirty Shirley or Friedman Smallbox pedal through the clean channel.
I really like what I've heard of Friedman amps. I find it easier to get *the* Marshall sound that is in my head on a Friedman than on an actual Marshall. I have tried Marshalls and Friedman's and that is the conclusion I've come to. I would get either the Mini Dirty Shirley or Pink Taco. Whilst I've tried them in the past, I cannot try these locally at the minute because no one has stock.
I also really like what I've head of the Engl Fireball 25. It's a super versatile amp from what I've heard, and it has a good clean channel that takes pedals well. I haven't tried this amp myself though, and cannot try it locally.
Friedman amps obviously have a bit of a premium pricetag here in the UK. For the same price of a new Friedman head, I could just about get an Engl Fireball 25, Engl 2x12 and a Friedman pedal.
The Victory Sheriff 25 is also an option instead of a Friedman. However, I've tried Friedman and Engl amps in the past so I sort-of know what to expect. Victory amps are a complete unknown to me. The Sheriff is also only a hundred pounds cheaper than the Friedman Dirty Shirley/ Pink Taco, and I've heard the Victory amps are PCB-based whereas the Victory's are not. So I think that extra money does get you a better product? Happy to be corrected though. The Friedman's master volumes are superb too.
I'm leaning towards the Fireball since it's also got some great rock tones up it's sleeve. The Dirty Shirley pedal also gets superb reviews, so I know with a clean valve channel it should get me 80-90% of the Friedman amp sound. Also, from past experience, I think there are better Marshall-in-a-box pedals than 'metal' pedals.
Is there a reason that I am missing that would be more beneficial to get the Friedman head instead? I guess it ultimately boils down to which tone I favour (i.e. rock vs metal), but I would welcome any opinions.
0 LOL 0 Wow! 0 Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Comments
This highlights a really important point. A Friedman pedal through an Engl will sound like an Engl, where as a Friedman pedal (or most other pedals) through a Friedman clean(ish) setting will sound like a Friedman. Pedals sound wildly different rough different amps. My opinion is that the inherent base tone of the amp makes the most difference as you are boosting/adding to an existing core tone of the amp.
I have the Friedman Dirty Shirley Mini head for sale in the classifieds for £860. It's frickin amazing. I'm only selling as the other guitarist in the band has a full size Marshall head and cab and I want the same purely for the look on stage. And it nails AC/DC and Guns n Roses. We play Rock n Roll Damnation, Highway to Hell, Whole lotta Rosie, Sweet Child O Mine. Plus Van Halen, Pink Floyd, Free, Rolling Stones. It pretty much covers all these tones IMHO.
Hope this helps.
So would you rate the setup you referenced? I.e. a lower gain Friedman (Dirty Shirley) with the use of other pedals (Friedman in this case) to reach higher gain tones while retaining and emphasising the base amp tone?
At gig level live in the mix it almost makes no difference. I tend to use the pedals just because I have a pedal board with tuner etc on anyway, so stomping on pedals can make it slightly easier and also easier to get much cleaner tones (base amp tone for pedals) for funk and other cleanish tones I need for various numbers throughout the set.
I'm initially drawn to the PT, since I really don't play with any less gain than what is found on your standard AC/DC or GNR song, and I think it could easily be pushed into Metallica territory. However, I'm not sure if I'll miss out on the more vintage voiced LS for cleans.
I could theoretically run the LS a bit dirty and ride the guitar volume pot for cleans, then have a pedal to get it into rock territory and have another pedal to hopefully push it into a bit of thrash.
Or is it best to just have that balls-out rock tone to begin with and ride the volume for lower gain things? Argh!
if not, look at the JJ Jr .
The normal gain channel CAN do classic rock at low gain, with lower pickups. it also can do heavy by itself or boosted.
the JJ switch adds more saturation and tightens / compresses more. A TS infront does as much metal as you'll ever need.
But there is a volume drop, so you can't just switch between the two which is annoying.
I now just have to decide if I want a dedicated clean channel. The PT20 won't be a problem on my dual-volume pot guitars, but may pose a problem on others.
I think I'm now pretty clear the Friedman's will get me where I want in terms of my base sound at this time. I just need to have a look at PT and Runt comparisons to confirm
JJ jnr has separate volumes for clean and dirty.
Dirty has a switch for normal / JBE.
If you really want mega gainz. Could use a dizel preamp or something as a pre amp ?