Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I tried a set of them in what, by convention, is called "light" gauge these days, though it's really at least medium by modern standards, 12-53. Contrary to expectations, they were remarkably pleasant. Certainly old school strings, quite hard on the fingers fresh on and a bit harsh and shouty sounding, but they settle down very nicely and produce a lovely clear tone without shredding the fingers. Long-lasting too, and not expensive. I'd buy them again for the right instrument.
I appreciate that this is an unusual use case, but I will literally not use string manufacturers that don't package their strings individually. I know about the environmental implications, but the fact is that as a blind person, I can restring guitars independently if I know which string is which. When all 6 strings come out of a package in one clump, try telling the difference between a high B and high E without sight. Maybe some folks can do it by feel but I have never found a way to do so.
When they're individually packaged, they come out in order, I put them down in order and trust that they are going to go sequentially. I had one string set where the G and B were mixed up and I broke one, but that's only happened once in the years I've been restringing.
So if I must choose accessibility and independence over environmental concerns, I'm choosing accessibility every time.
Matt
You spark an idea. One of the string manufacturers - er ... it might be Adamas - attaches a small label maybe 6mm square to each string (the string passes through a tiny hole in the label). Each label visually identifies the string. (I think it just has something like "E 6th" written on it but I don't pay much attention. Maybe there is a colour code.)
Now that isn't all that useful because if you are sighted you can see the different string sizes (so why do you need a label? (OK, I have to wear my reading glasses, but I'm old.)
Why not do that buy use different shaped labels? 1st string, square. 2nd string, triangular. 3rd string circular. Then repeat for the 4th, 5th, and 6th strings (as no-one is going to mistake a 12 for a 25 or a 16 for a 44).
Cost: hardly anything. Environmental impact? Tiny. Use - well, anyone could drop all 6 strings and muddle them up and still easily tell which one is which.
EDIT: PS: I am now recording the type of packaging every time I open a packet of strings. It will take a while before I have a meaningful number listed though.
The energy and materials that go into making the actual strings will be have a much higher environmental impact than the minor differences in packaging. Also, if you have to replace them twice as often, you will need twice the amount of whatever packaging you use.
In theory, coated strings would have some advantages there, but then you are shedding microplastic particles as they wear.
So I'm going to stick with the packaging as the main factor, but recognising that this will vary from one place to another.
That way you get to moan about buying fake strings rather than the packaging they come in.