Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Point is .......in this day and age the public may cling on to the odd old icon but musicians are totally irrelevant to both the type of music,the listening market and the overall performance.
I saw The weekn'd a month ago ........great show but not a musician or instrument in sight.
In time it will be the equivalent of saying that The Moonlight Sonata was a wonderful performance spoiled by the fact that Ludvig didn't conduct it .
A musician is a person who makes music.
I can imagine that's ok with the guy too - all the fun of the shows without being stopped by 10 people every time you're in Tescos!
I was discussing that old BBC Bon Jovi gig on here the other day and the supporting musicians (second guitarist and bassist) weren't hidden but they were out of the way and the TV production hardly featured them. I kind of think it's odd, you are a band or you are a front person with backing musicians. This 'three original members left plus some blokes dressed in black' approach always seems an unhappy compromise to me.
Was discussed elsewise on here, and it's very true, people expect something very different from a gig these days now that the tickets for big bands round about a tonne each, or even more.
At one point, something a bit ropier was acceptable, but now everything needs to be perfect every time, so there is way more use of extra musicians to compensate for an oldies old fingers, even extra drummers sometimes. more use of keys and of course, backing tracks.
If a band permanently replaces a musician and that person plays on the records, etc, as well as live, then absolutely they should be featured as a band member.
If they tour with supplementary musicians - second guitarist, extra keyboardist, backing singers etc - and there's no question that those people are never going to write with the band or play on a record, then I think it's right that they take something of a back seat, without necessarily being "invisible".
It depends on the type of act, too. If it's a solo singer no-one really cares about the backing band even if they're full-time for years. if it's a rock band, it's pretty hard to have an anonymous stand-in. Current example - Kiko Loureiro is taking some time out from Megadeth and he's been temporarily replaced by a guy called Teemu Mäntysaari - that guy's going to get his time in the spotlight.
And of course, it was never going be to possible to replace the Moon.
That is maybe why the Who have’nt been the Stones as gilt edged operation.
is it crazy how saying sentences backwards creates backwards sentences saying how crazy it is?
But some bands are already touring with no original members, as noted on another recent thread.