UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45
25% (or) 10% Power Switch
Is this (resistor-complex) prone to all the problems of resistive (as opposed to reactive) attenuators?
25% Power Switch
The switch places an 8 ohm 25 watt resistor in series with the 8 ohm amplifier speaker (for a total of 16 ohms and a 50% cut in power), then places a 16 ohm 25 watt resistor in parallel to bring the total speaker load back down to 8 ohms and gives another 50% cut in power. The two resistors turn 3/4 of the amp's output signal into heat. With the switch in the "Normal" position the 8 ohm resistor is bypassed and the 16 ohm resistor is disconnected.
10% Power SwitchIf you really want near-bedroom volume levels then a 90% cut in power can be attained by using a 16 ohm 25W resistor for the upper resistor and a 12 ohm 25W resistor for the lower resistor (8 ohm output transformer secondary). The 12 ohm resistor will burn most of the amp's output so for anything more powerful than a cathode biased push-pull 6V6 amp like the 5E3 Deluxe you'll need to bump the 12 ohm resistor's power handling to 50 watts to be safe (two 25 ohm 25 watt resistors in parallel will work).
With the switch set to 10% both jacks will be 8 ohm with 90% of the amp power turned into resistor heat. These 25 watt resistors are adequate for 15 watt amps such as a 5E3 Deluxe or other cathode biased 6V6 push-pull amps.
Expert opinions most appreciated...
0 LOL 0 Wow! 0 Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Comments
The key is to avoid too low a resistance in parallel with the speaker, which damps it excessively and strangles the tone - this is usually why most attenuators don’t sound good when turned down a long way, rather than their effect on the amp, which becomes irrelevant once there’s any significant attenuation. This design does that, because there’s no parallel resistance with the speaker, it’s actually in series.
(This is not the same problem as generating a line signal from a dummy load, where you do generally need a reactive rather than resistive load, because there is no speaker involved.)
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
This design does that…
Conventional variable attenuators usually apply a resistance in series with the amp and another in parallel with the speaker, to give a standard power divider - but the problem is that at high attenuation, the resistance in parallel with the speaker is much less than that of the speaker itself, so it damps the speaker heavily and kills its dynamics and ‘open’ tone… hence the reputation they have for producing a flat, lifeless tone. But this design adds a *higher* resistance in series with the speaker - using the speaker’s own impedance as the lower half of the divider - and then corrects the load on the amp with another resistor in parallel with the *amp*, not the speaker.
Does that make sense?
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
So for an 1W amplifier would you recommend a 25% power switch or a 10% power switch?
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
Here's one built into the back of my tweed deluxe cab. Whisper quiet if need be.
Using one of these:
https://willys-hifi.com/products/l-pad-attenuator-100w-8-ohm-wirewound-volume-control?variant=1194100545
Same as the one used in the Guitarist magazine DIY attenuator project.