Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
If you're on a budget, or if you want something to cover a few effects that you don't want to spend a lot of money for, it's well worth considering.
If you need a pitch shifter or a reverb with presets you'll need to spend a lot more to get anything else.
IMO it really comes in to its own when you pair it with something that can control it with MIDI (clock sync, expression pedal control, patch change) and something that can move it around the signal chain so you can use more of the effects categories.
I've got two that I use with my ES-5. I've had them for several years and haven't had any problems with reliability.
The downside is that it needs isolated power. You can't daisy chain it or it'll hum like a bastard (as you know, bastards hum very loudly).
Don't talk politics and don't throw stones. Your royal highnesses.
I did love the interface of the M9 though!
To my ears the M5 is gritty and lo-fi but in a pleasing way. I've never been in a situation where I am not able to dial in something I am happy with
I don't use the delays or reverbs but they are excellent. The filters are fun too
However, given the HX FX can be had for around £300 used, that's a far better deal. Sounds simply awesome and is still being updated.
The guy at PMT said Line 6 keep making the M5 because people keep buying them. I don't think the price has moved much since 2009, so you're benefiting from all that economy of scale
I still have an M5 on my 'big' board - its a swiss army knife. Yes, there are more funky pedals out there - yes, I'm sure that under a microscope you may find more "character" in other pedals (whatever that may mean to you)... and powering it can be a bit of a challenge as it needs true isolation from the rest of the power supplies... but the fact remains that for the money, *nothing* else offers so much for so little. Its utterly brilliant.
I still use the M13 as my 'grab n go' if I'm filling in for something/someone. These days I plug it into an AMPED1 but back in the day, I'd sling that into the front end of *any* amp and could find something gig-worthy - and often more inspiring than my expectation.
So yes, I'd say they're worth a punt - and despite the cynical old hacks on t'internet who'll rubbish anything that isn't the latest emperors new clothes/most expensive booteek/their preferred brand/what Josh is playing this month, they genuinely do deliver.
Basically just one M5 in loop 4, another in loop 5, both connected to the ES-5's MIDI output (I needed a MIDI splitter to do this because the M5 can send and receive MIDI commands (MIDI IN/OUT) but doesn't pass on commands received via the MIDI IN).
Because the ES-5 loops can be ordered however you want, I move the M5s around the signal chain depending on what I'm using them for- earlier for pitch shifting, some modulations etc, and at the end of the chain for reverbs and other mods. I don't use it for delay much because I have a DD-500, and I don't use the distortions very much because they aren't very good.
Each patch on the ES-5 switches on the audio loops I want and sends a MIDI message to select the preset I want from the M5. On some of them I use MIDI to control the expression pedal functions- you can do things like flip between different intervals on the harmonizer, or the slow and fast settings on the Leslie sims. Basically, anything that the M5 expression pedal can control can be controlled via MIDI. Likewise, MIDI clock is like tap tempo for all your MIDI pedals, so I can synchronise the M5s to each other (and any other MIDI pedals).
I already had the M5s, but seeing this guy's videos on what could be done with the two in combination was a big part of why I wanted an ES-5:
Don't talk politics and don't throw stones. Your royal highnesses.
Just set it up before hand .
I had mine set up at 3 points on my last board
Pre amp, fx loop, after atenuator for IR
Upsides: filters, modulation, delays are all good and are synced with the same tap tempo (if you want them to be).
The size is a good balance between portability and having enough controls, sensibly spaced.
.
It is almost as intuitive to use as separate pedals. The learning curve is maybe ten or fifteen minutes.
Downsides: some pitch effects are very glitchy (notably not the model of the boss oc2, which isn't quite like the original, but is very usable). Some people complain about the non-standard power supply, but it doesn't bother me.
Because of the improved switch actuators and better support for the switch pcbas on these, the switch issues from the 4x4 range went away with these. The processors aren’t overstressed in them and the software is actually probably the most bulletproof of the Line6 range to that point.
They didn’t really have a weak point - certainly not in their warranty period. And I don’t recall any howlers or horror stories during the 10 years I worked there about this range.
Genuinely - I was there from the beginning of that range. It was probably the best range Line6 made (reliability speaking) of the pre-Yamaha era.
But as ever, Believe what you want. :-)
I did trade for a TC Electronic Nova System but it froze after a week, so I had to get a replacement part for it. Nice pedal too but bulky. And probably not worth my while or hassle selling it.
Agree with reliability on the M9 - I had one that was bulletproof even with everyday use and gigging. Also had an M5 with a dodgy encoder, but I bought that used so couldn't comment on whether it had been abused. I think the M9 is the perfect compromise and was dead easy to use. Glad it was used as the basis for the HX FX in terms of form factor.
The HX FX only has two loops though, which could take my Rat and Fuzz.
With the RAT, you won't need it in the loop. One of the best and most responsive RATS I've ever played (and that's a few) is the Ratatouille model in the HX. It's stunning and I'd question the rat-based experience of anyone who disagrees.
as I’d like to experiment with one before and after reverbs and delays.
You can assign any effect to any pedal, have some effects set to be 'always on' and assigned to no footswitch (a compressor or boost maybe) and multiple effects assigned to be activated by one switch, or even 'flip flop' between two groups with one switch. You can even run parallel paths for multiple instruments - having a couple of effects given over the an acoustic FX chain is perfectly possible, for example.
Way more flexible than the 3 FX/3 alternates + looper of the M9, but more complicated as a result!