Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Anything longer or shorter than those lengths is officially weird. You'll normally only see shorter scales in student guitars and mini-guitars.
Most major makers have a "mini" range. They are very seldom much good. In the end, with an acoustic you need to physically move the top to get a sound out of it and it is easier to do that with a full-length scale.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
Or of course there are also lighter gauges (try not to go down that route if you do not have to) and best of all, a whole world of lower-tension, easier playing strings to choose from. In my book, this is the best route of all: you stay at standard scale length (with all the advantages that confers, from better intonation through superior tone to to wider choice of instruments), and you have nice gentle-feeling strings, and they are still full-weight and still move that heavy acoustic top (almost) just like old-school hard strings.
So most Gibsons Epiphones are going to be 24.3/4
Gretsch Jim Dandy 24" scale although tonally more blues old Americana.
Some of the Ed sheerans are shorter scale
Wee Loudons are 24" but big bucks
There are as said plenty of shorter-scale so-called travel guitars largely based around the idea of the GS Mini but some are 24" instead of 23.5.
With the shortening of scale, you get a slightly more compressed mid-range tone but a lot of designs and bracings can help overcome limitations the biggest constraint is with smaller body sizes will have more effect than scale length.
In the end, as you are doing play a lot of different types keep an open mind and find something that works for you everybody's guitar needs are different and a lot is dependent on what style of music you like to play but ultimately you can play anything on anything.
I wonder what's preferable... Going down a gauge or detuning a half step. I stay in standard tuning and use 11s. Easier to play AND sounds better, strangely!
Re short scale, can understand re flubby comments etc. Less bass, too...
BUT, they are what they are and if you play light and like a sweet sound, I like the short scale, too. Warmer. Longer scale better for detuning
My YouTube Channel
I would have thought 11s tuned to D or Eflat standard are going to feel pretty loose.
If you like a sweet sound I'd be looking at a full scale smaller bodied guitar with spruce or maybe even cedar too. Tanin is the guy to ask about wood combos but a smaller body can sound wonderfully sweet and be much more comfortable to play. Especially if you play a lot of electrics, a Dreadnaught can feel like a large navy vessel under your arm.
Might be me worth trying 12s in those....
In fact I am presently using bluegrass 13s on my parlour to beef up the bass tension but the 13s are a bit heavy feeling so hmm I will check if Newtowne do low tension bluegrass strings.
My YouTube Channel
But anyway, re Thomas's post, in the end, it is all about what works for you, isn't it. Some of the great players of the 60s and 70s used 8s and got fantastic tone. SRV used bridge cables. The moral of the story? Different things work for different people. Yes, they were electric players but the moral still holds. If 9s work for Bruce and 11s work for Thomas and David likes 13s, so be it. Always do what works.
ROUND CORES:
Off the top of my head, the lightest strings listed here would be the Pyramid Silvers, the La Bellas, and the Santa Cruz; the heaviest the Pyramid Western Folk (still pretty easy going) and the Curt Mangans (getting a little muscular).
My favourites? Hell, most of them. Not in order: Sunbeams, Curt Mangans, Pyramid Silver, La Bella, Adamas, Galli LS. All good 'uns.
PS: Bluegrass strings are 12-56. 13s are 13-56. Not the same thing - and a bigger difference than it seems.
Newtone strings are not coated. They do any size you like. Their extra charge for a custom set is small change. A great service!
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
The 11s I find a little bendy & am about to go back to the 12s . They have a great tone, about £11 a set, they're not coated.
Round core is the way to go for lower tension.
Newtone website states the tension for each string in the sets they do. Only slight downside is I find their website a bit of a dog's breakfast, but hey, they're great strings & they're made over here!
Other lower tension strings to consider would be the DR Sunbeams/Rare or I believe their Dragonskins are coated but not tried them (see their website).
I use Elixir 12s on my other guitar, total stated tension is 162 lbs, the Heritage come in at 131 lbs.
By comparison D'adarrio 11s are around 150lbs.
As you can see, I had a good look, trying to reduce the strain on an older guitar......
My YouTube Channel