Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I said my OM-28 is "perfect" cos it gives me the tone I'd been searching for since 1960.
Now,no two acoustics can possibly sound the same, regardless of models/manufacturers (let's not drag that into it again). But this Martin OM-28 Re-imagined ticks ALL the boxes, has the tone I've spent almost a lifetime searching for so (for me) it's every acoustic I'll ever want so (again, for me) it's.......
erm....... Perfect
I completely agree with smellyfingers that gear acquisition and reading/comparing can definitely get in the way of becoming a better guitarist. I used to spend lots of time trying to justify that this or that will make me a better.... Or make me sound better. And I dont disagree with the subtleties of back woods having different sounds and in general acoustics being better for different things. But I feel like these differences are dwarfed by playing ability and if you wish to be the best player, I think time and money is better spent practicing.
However, I'm a bit of a geek and tend to love getting really involved in the technical/history side of guitars. For this reason, I love reading about and playing different guitars and potentially buying/collecting. I have found it much easier to justify this if I'm honest to myself and go into it knowing that it is unlikely to make me a better player but I'd like a new guitar for XYZ reasons. I've found this leads to significantly less disappointment in the long run.
This is just how I approach it. I am incredibly fortunate that the first 'proper' guitar I bought after playing my grandad's old Korean made Franconia for years is still the best guitar I have ever heard so maybe I found my 'one' way sooner than I had any merit to.
My YouTube Channel
@Tannin Agreed.
Now- it is possible that depending on what and how you play, there may be something perfect as @Mellish said. A lot of this is dependent on the person.
Another thing is, you have to work with what you've got (the person, I mean). It's probably completely true that spending money on lessons (instead of gear) and practising more will make you better. In the same way that eating kale all the time is healthier than eating chocolate. But if you're the kind of person who struggles with that, if buying (or even just researching) new gear occasionally is what keeps your interest and stops you from quitting, that's probably worth it.
I mean... I did everything wrong when I started learning guitar (I'm self-taught, though I had lessons in other instruments before I played guitar). I learnt everything in the wrong order (I could play Van Halen lead licks before I could play a G chord!), and I still have some pretty alarming rudimentary gaps in my knowledge. And I certainly don't practise enough, and spend more time looking at guitars and associated gear online than practising. But I'm still playing. And I still enjoy it. If I'd done it "right", I might well be a far better player than I am now. I also might well have quit within 3 weeks- and it goes without saying that if that had happened I'd be a much worse guitar player than I am now.
It may not be good for ALL genres, I'm not pretending that, but this OM-28 just does folk/blues and is so good at that, that my search for an acoustic is over. I consider it perfect in that way.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
Since buying it I've devoted more time to becoming a better acoustic player, something my J35 is good enough not to stand in the way of.
Some of the classic tones which made a lot of us want to play in the first place were made on the only guitars available at the time, often with non "classic" features, like Gibson acoustics with Tuneomatic bridges, or CBS-era Strats. Nobody could "run the racks" then, they bought the only Les Paul in the window, or whatever they could get from a US airbase.
I could have compared a dozen J35s looking for The One, but we all know that a magical guitar tone one day doesn't seem to have the same aura the following morning even with the same player with the same guitar in the same room, so picking one guitar out of dozens of others feels like a fool's errand to me.
Delaying the purchase of a guitar also delays learning how to get the best out of it, what strings it likes, and how to produce its best tones.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
But even then, sometimes a cheap guitar will have ‘something’ you like that no expensive one does. Never sell that Aria.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
but wanted to add a few thoughts.
Of course find what you like but having only really got into acoustics properly over the last 10 years myself the one thing I learnt is having played electric and not bothered with the one acoustic I have had since the 70’s. as an electric player your touch and ability is pretty unuanced coming straight off years of playing electric. Also you are probably not half as attuned to the the sounds of an acoustic.
Also the guitar you buy if new will probably change a good bit overtime. We all hope we get more of what’s we liked but that is not always the case.
if you play it a lot over the years your ability to bring out the best in the guitar will increase as you evolve with the instrument through different songs.
So as I see it if 10 years ago someone had handed me the so called one I would not have had the skills or knowledge to appreciate what I was holding.
if I was in you situation of not being able to travel to try lots of different styles and brands I would just pickup something that is considered a good budget guitar. Something people rate and is good value live and learn with it till you can get the time to explore more brands and styles you will better understand yours and the guitars strengths and weaknesses. .
there are a whole lot of solid wood good value acoustics out there it is a golden time .
hth
I agree with you... except even with the small number of acoustics I've tried, they seem to be very variable even with the same model! Especially Gibson, too.
That being said, as I've said before, I bought my Dowina without trying a single one of them and it's great. It definitely can work out!
Let me illustrate your case with the examples of my two brothers. Brother #1 has had a lovely Japanese-made 12-string for 50 years. For all that time, it was the only guitar he wanted or needed. Last year, probably led over to the Dark Side by me, he decided he wanted a 6-string as well. I pointed him at several which I thought would suit his ear, playing style, and budget, and he ended up buying the same one I liked the look of - a Larivee. He lives interstate so I haven't played it yet but I'm sure that it (together with the CBS 12) will be the only two guitars he ever needs or wants.
Brother #2 is the real musician in the family He mostly plays electric and is a wizard at recording and mixing. Sometimes he thinks about replacing his ancient plywood Morris acoustic (which is playable, more-or-less) with something nice. I once offered to give him one of my Matons. Thank god he declined - in the time since then I have come to love that cedar-top dread. It has opened up beautifully. Or possibly I've learned to play a bit. This bears on @Jez6345789's point - our guitars change and our tastes change and the way we play them changes. This is one of the many reasons why, no @ICBM, Doves are not The Answer.
Back to Brother #2. He mostly plays electric and has two: one for standard tuning, one tuned to Eb because his band tunes to Eb (for reasons no-one can remember now). They are good quality guitars, one Ibanez, one Strat, but nothing outstanding, and if you stole them both and gave him (say) a Tele or a 335, it really wouldn't matter much. His main interest is production. His guitar is simply a tool he uses to record stuff with. Any good guitar would do and he doesn't fiddle with them. In contrast, he fiddles endlessly with recording software and equipment, always looking for the "perfect" setup.
Contrast with me. I have 7 acoustic guitars plus one being built in Hobart and I think I'll probably order yet another later on this year while I'm in the UK for a few days. How many of those do I need? One. Not any one of the seven, it would have to be an all-rounder not too specialised in one sound or another. Does having all those fine guitars make me a better player? Sure it does - but the difference is small.
Would I do better to put that time and money and energy into more lessons and practice? No.
Flat no. I already do as much practice and as much study as I am capable of without burning out my love and interest and/or blowing up my left arm tendons. (The arm is fine, I just have to remember not to make unreasonable demands of it.)
So it's a lot of money and a lot of energy buying guitars resulting in only a small return. (I could get by with just one.) Why do it? Because I like doing it.
(If you ever think of a better reason for doing anything, let me know!)
Equally, my old Taylor 214 was a spectacular instrument that cost (at the time) around 350 - an absurdly good guitar for that price.