Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Soundwise it was quite loud but, to my ears, a little on the brittle side. Also not enough bass response. I ended up selling it.
However, I recently watched a clip on Utube from Andertons comparing the various Epiphone by Gibson range of acoustics and was very impressed with the Hummingbird and the J200. I think the 2 guys doing to test concluded that the J200 was definitely the best of the bunch with the Hummingbird a close second. This range from Epiphone are all solid woods and stupidly good value for money. At around £700 for either of these 2 models new you get a huge amount of guitar for your money although there is no case or gig bag. They seem to hold their value used and sell for around £500 (ish) so also a great option. I narrowly missed a mint Hummingbird for sale recently for £400 with an epi hard case!
I would definitely be happy to invest in the J200 if one came up used. This is, I think, the aforementioned video and there are quite a few on Utube as well:
#
Many find SJ-200's dead - dry and unresponsive with little sustain. All the things that make them the perfect rhythm / strumming guitar for recording and live use IMO. They tend to come alive with a firmer touch, and 'go to sleep' if they've not been played for a while. Mine is more sensitive to humidity changes affecting the tone than any other acoustic I've owned.
They don't have the bass boom of dreads, but a good one with a sensible action sounds huge and balanced when strummed with dry woody mids, perfect for vocal accompaniment. None of the ones I've played sound particularly good with single note runs tbh - a bit brittle and thin.
My advice would be to go for one that's been played in for a good few years. If you're not bothered by the complete bling of the standard model, have a look for a J-100 XT, J-150 or a 2009-2012 SJ-200 Studio (before they started using walnut/rosewood and a shallower body depth).
The maple SJ-200 Studio seems to be the best value used considering it's essentially the same guitar as a standard, but with plainer aesthetics. It's the model I have.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
Two Studio, two Standard J-200, two SJ-200 - it makes no difference. They won't both sound the same cos they can't. Each one is unique in that way.
All you can do is try 'em, as @ICBM there says, and make up your own mind.
I once worked for a shop which ordered two new J-45s from Gibson, and when they arrived they had nearly consecutive serial numbers. One was great and one was a dog! The dog was badly set up too, but sorting that didn't make it sound good. My guess was that whoever was responsible for doing the set-up at Gibson realised as soon as they played it that nothing was going to help, so just didn't bother.
Someone bought it anyway...
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
Not super-helpful here in Northern Ireland where you're lucky if the shop has one of the thing you're looking for (in fact I don't think we have any Gibson dealers here any more)...
(I haven't tried any J-200s.)
Oh they do. I've seen some real shockers that have still found homes