Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused). Who bought a Transacoustic Yamaha? Did you keep it? - Acoustics Discussions on The Fretboard
UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45

Who bought a Transacoustic Yamaha? Did you keep it?

What's Hot
goldtopgoldtop Frets: 5625
Just wondering how you got on with it after the 'honeymoon period'. A small parlour/concert-size guitar might be a perfect sofa-side guitar for me. Solid rosewood LS-TA or laminated mahogany FS-TA/CFS-TA. (I have a Sigma J45 for loud strumming in the music room.)

But... although every single YT review of these had gushing praise for the transacoustic idea (aside from Paul Davids), I can't see any of these guitars in any of the comparison videos (Andertons, Alamo, etc).

So I am wondering if it's a gimmick once the novelty wears off? Or do acoustic purists - which I'm not - scoff at the idea?

Please share your experiences. TIA.
0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter

Comments

  • TanninTannin Frets: 4394
    I'll be interested to see what the hive mind has to say on this. 

    My guess - and this is 100% pure guesswork unsullied by any hands-on experience whatsoever - is that the electronic gimmickry  will get switched off permanently fairly early on, but it will be a real Yamaha acoustic guitar when you turn the junk off, and pretty decent for that reason.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • CrankyCranky Frets: 2109
    edited October 2022
    I have an FSTA.

     It’s definitely a real guitar junk off.  It’s fun to play and sounds nice, not even boxy if you strum it with a pick. And the fx make me smile.

    Tons of them for sale used in the States, which I don’t get.  Not sure about the UK.  If you have mixed feelings about the fx, then I would definitely just buy used, as the new price probably has you looking for something less “gimmicky” (if that’s how you feel about it).
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • DavidRDavidR Frets: 595
    Never tried one either. I'm the opposite of attracted (repelled? - too strong) by anything electric on an acoustic as I do not feel it's part of the acoustic tradition and path. I don't even like the current trend to always fit amplification to acoustics à la Taylor.

    Suppose that makes me a purist, or old. Every time I've tried an electric guitar, or any type of electric acoustic guitar device, I've got bored with it. I think I would get bored with Transacoustic too. Love Yamaha acoustics. Have 3.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • JohnCordyJohnCordy Frets: 587
    I have one - it's my only acoustic - I love it - the LSTA
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • goldtopgoldtop Frets: 5625
    Thanks chaps. I'm still on the fence, although logically, just switching it off gives the exact same tone as the non-TA versions, and then there's always the output for recording without the internal FX.

    (Dithering...) 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • JohnCordyJohnCordy Frets: 587
    @goldtop yeh I don't use the chorus, but the reverb can be useful for unplugged playing, and then I just use it as my go to acoustic for duo work etc
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • StuckfastStuckfast Frets: 2124
    I tried one at a trade show once. IIRC both the effects are quite understated and subtle from the player's point of view. I'm not really a fan of either chorus or reverb on acoustic guitar, though, so didn't really see the point.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • goldtopgoldtop Frets: 5625
    Stuckfast said:
    I tried one at a trade show once. IIRC both the effects are quite understated and subtle from the player's point of view. I'm not really a fan of either chorus or reverb on acoustic guitar, though, so didn't really see the point.
    And that PoV might explain why these guitars appeared as wow-look-at-this reviews when new, but never got included in the comparative reviews afterwards (Andertons, Alamo, etc). 

    I'm about 75% persuaded though - but I think I need to try one in person. Main q is whether the parlour version is too small and/or whether the 'S' concert size is a bit too big.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • tomjaxtomjax Frets: 59
    I've only tried one in a store. The effects were impressive and I could see them coming in useful at times. But the biggest thing I noted about the guitars was how HEAVY they are with all the electronics bundled in them.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • chor808chor808 Frets: 65
    I had the lsta and sold it. It was great but the novelty wore off and you end up with a heavy acoustic. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • goldtopgoldtop Frets: 5625
    Interesting about the weight. The LS is almost dreadnought size already. I'll see if Yamaha lists the weights.

    (I did go down the rabbit hole of built-in FX.looking at the Hyvibe and LAVA guitars. But they lack the immediacy of the Yamaha's simpler system.)
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • chor808chor808 Frets: 65
    edited October 2022
    Unless you really need the onboard effects I'd get an ls6 or ls16. 
    I've got the ll36, A5R and a silent guitar for gigs (I wish it was silent with all the  mistakes).
    They are all great but the 36 is something special. If you can find a LS26 or above get it.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • goldtopgoldtop Frets: 5625
    Thanks. LS/AC are at the top of the size range for me. I already have a J45 copy. If I get an LS, I will get the TA and just ignore the FX when I don't want them.

    I'll have a look into the differences in 16/26/36 spec, so see what upgrade are toneful and what's blingy. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • I had a go on one in a shop and was quite pleasantly surprised by the reverb - a lot less gimmicky-sounding than I expected. Not sure I'd really want to pay extra just for the effects at the expense of the base guitar (although the one I tried sounded pretty decent with the effects off as well), but I think if my guitar had that option I'd probably use it a fair bit.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • CrankyCranky Frets: 2109
    There’s always a Tonewood Amp a-la Mike Dawes.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • goldtopgoldtop Frets: 5625
    ^ I saw a video on that, but I prefer Yamaha's approach. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • CrankyCranky Frets: 2109
    ^Yamaha’s is less clumsy.

    But my Tonewood turns all of my acoustics into the Yamaha, and with a few extra fx (I like the Leslie setting).

    I have both because the Yamaha sits at a friend’s place in Hawaii.  I bought it there and left it knowing that it’s basically the ideal climate to leave an acoustic unattended for prolonged periods.  I thought the FSTA was fun enough that I toyed with getting another for at home, but decided on the Tonewood instead because I didn’t really want a whole other guitar.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • goldtopgoldtop Frets: 5625
    Makes sense. I've just ordered the entry level CSF-TA as a sofa-side guitar. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • guitarjack66guitarjack66 Frets: 1397
    edited October 2022
    goldtop said:
    Just wondering how you got on with it after the 'honeymoon period'. A small parlour/concert-size guitar might be a perfect sofa-side guitar for me. Solid rosewood LS-TA or laminated mahogany FS-TA/CFS-TA. (I have a Sigma J45 for loud strumming in the music room.)

    But... although every single YT review of these had gushing praise for the transacoustic idea (aside from Paul Davids), I can't see any of these guitars in any of the comparison videos (Andertons, Alamo, etc).

    So I am wondering if it's a gimmick once the novelty wears off? Or do acoustic purists - which I'm not - scoff at the idea?

    Please share your experiences. TIA.
    I have a Sigma GA sized as my best guitar and really like it's sound/tone and neck/fretboard. I plumped for Sigma after trying a Sigma travel or 3/4 sized as I thought that felt great too. I am delighted with it and wondered if you'd considered another smaller Sigma to go with the larger model you have? Like I say,the one I tried felt and sounded very nice,even at the small sized but it was just a bit smaller than I wanted. They are generally reasonably priced too.
    PS Just seen that you've ordered a guitar but maybe somebody else can think about my suggestion in future.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • goldtopgoldtop Frets: 5625
    goldtop said:
    Just wondering how you got on with it after the 'honeymoon period'. A small parlour/concert-size guitar might be a perfect sofa-side guitar for me. Solid rosewood LS-TA or laminated mahogany FS-TA/CFS-TA. (I have a Sigma J45 for loud strumming in the music room.)

    But... although every single YT review of these had gushing praise for the transacoustic idea (aside from Paul Davids), I can't see any of these guitars in any of the comparison videos (Andertons, Alamo, etc).

    So I am wondering if it's a gimmick once the novelty wears off? Or do acoustic purists - which I'm not - scoff at the idea?

    Please share your experiences. TIA.
    I have a Sigma GA sized as my best guitar and really like it's sound/tone and neck/fretboard. I plumped for Sigma after trying a Sigma travel or 3/4 sized as I thought that felt great too. I am delighted with it and wondered if you'd considered another smaller Sigma to go with the larger model you have? Like I say,the one I tried felt and sounded very nice,even at the small sized but it was just a bit smaller than I wanted. They are generally reasonably priced too.
    PS Just seen that you've ordered a guitar but maybe somebody else can think about my suggestion in future.
    Interesting. I had thought that Eastman's pricing and quality had sort of usurped the place of Sigma in the market. There are some all-solid Sigma models now, so I will see if there's a GA/Concert size for the next one.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • goldtopgoldtop Frets: 5625
    Just an update to say that the CFS-TA arrived and this parlour-size is perfect for the sofa. Action is quite a bit higher than I'd like, but I gather that's normal for newly made acoustics? All the others I've had have been s/h and someone else has done a setup.

    As for the transacoustic thing ... it's a sort of guilty pleasure. I know it's not pure/real, and 90% of the time it's turned off. But for playing along to just about any '80s ballad or 60s/70s 12-string song, it's a lot of fun. Reminds me a bit of the echo you get on a karaoke machine.

    For my own stuff, I absolutely have to turn it off. It's distracting, and makes you (well, me) resort to that sound and style of playing.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • jca74jca74 Frets: 239
    Action is quite a bit higher than I'd like, but I gather that's normal for newly made acoustics?

    I bought a PRS SE20 parlour acoustic last year and the action was perfect out of the box. It had a bit of fret sprout which my local tech sorted for £15, but the neck relief and action haven't needed touching. It may be that yamaha go for a higher action setup from the factory to allow adjustment to  taste. If it is lower than you like it's harder to raise it than it is to lower it.

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.