Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
My YouTube Channel
The quote was very decent, it's JA Guitar Repairs in Edinburgh so will use his services again. It's to make the action on the Avalon lower as it's 3mm on high E right now which is too high for me
My YouTube Channel
It can be a pretty easy thing to know if you are doing. If it is a drop in saddle, of standard specs eg 72mm at 16" radius, you can get cheap ones on eBay to try things out first.
String height gauge and sanding block essential, although I use to just use the table.
Quite a satisfying little job actually. :-)
All I would add is, if you plan to do it yourself, and it would be your first attempt, get a spare and practice on that, not the original which you would keep as a guide.
It is one of the many little pleasures of buying a new guitar - taking it in to Paul to fettle, chewing the fat a little while he works, seeing how his latest new build is coming along, taking mine home again playing exactly the way I want it to. (Speaking of next new builds, when he finishes the current one, a sub-parlour, my jumbo baritone is next! Yay! (
My YouTube Channel
Tbh might ask him to do that as would love entire action to come down ever so slightly.
My YouTube Channel
The split saddle seems like a great piece of design.
AFAIK he shouldn't file the entire nut, but could lower the slots to bring the action down a little.
I have my own files to enlarge the slots for at the nut, which I have done for most of my electric guitars and a few of my acoustics. It's very easy to have catastrophic results! I once chipped the end of the fretboard trying to replace the nut.
Back to saddles. For some it's a fairly straightforward process, but the split ones like Avalon use would be outside my comfort zone as would the long glued in ones as you can find in some Martin guitars.
If you attempt it, and it goes wrong, the cost to you could be greater
Some people may be short on cash to pay a professional or live in a remotre location where they don't have access to professional services.
Some people may have plenty money and no time to devote to fettling, and so are happy to pay a professional as it represents good value to them.
Some people may be so ham-fisted that the thought of doing more to a guitar than changing strings fills them with trepidation of the disastrous consequences that await.
They're all right. The key is knowing what type of person you are and being realistic about your knowledge, abilities and limitations.
(a) If you make an arse of it the saddles most likely aren't off-the-shelf ones so you would have to have them made from scratch or modified from Takamine or other similar ones.
(b) It is much easier to make an arse of two separate saddles than just one.
Reducing the saddle height on an acoustic isn't a difficult job at all. The "difficult" aspect is knowing how much you can safely remove from the saddle's base and still have:
(a) An acceptable action
(b) An acceptable breakover angle from where the strings emerge from the bridge at the pins to the apex of the saddle.
There are ways you can work this out if you have experience. One thing to bear in mind is that when strung up to tension the bridge on a steel string acoustic usually pulls forward creating a dip in the soundboard in front of the bridge and a slight belly in the soundboard behind it. Depending on the type of internal top bracing, the type of wood used for the soundboard, and the age of the guitar, the dip and belly could be almost imperceptible to quite noticeable. If you were to try and measure how much material to file off the bridge while the guitar is unstrung, the results could be off when the guitar is then strung up.
When assessing this a luthier or tech will often use a straightedge lying right on the frets and extending to the bridge. Depending on where the bottom edge of the straightedge line up with the top of the bridge (i.e. over, in line with, or below) it is possible to get a pretty good idea how much, if any, the saddle can be reduced in height.
Another way to make this assessment is by ensuring that the neck relief is set correctly and that the depth of the nut slots are exactly of very close to the depth they need to be, and then measuring the action of the strings at the 12th fret. There are some generally accepted action measurements for the average player and the average acoustic guitar. If the action is much higher than the optimal measurements, the amount that it is higher than you are aiming to achieve can be doubled to give a good approximation of how much needs to come off the saddle. This isn't a rule though, just a guideline, and you can still make an arse of the saddle if you don't have the experience.
If the saddle needs to be lowered by a fair amount you can redress the lost breakover angle of the string over the saddle by filing angled slots into the front of the holes for the bridge pins so that there is a valley in the wood of the bridge for the string to start its angle from deeper into the hole and approach the saddle at a better angle than if it was starting its climb from the top surface of the bridge. This is best left for a very experienced tinkerer or an guitar tech/luthier. You can't replace what you filed off the wood a bit too aggressively.
As far as sanding the base of a one-piece saddle is concerned, others above have mentioned sliding the saddle along a straight and vertical edge to avoid sanding an angle across the thickness of the saddle. That is probably the most common mistake made. The other common issue is where you end sanding more off each end of the saddle resulting in something like the curved rocker of a rocking chair. This happens if you do short back and forward sanding motions while holding the saddle in the middle. I have found the best way to get a flat base is with long sanding motions in one direction and then flip the saddle around and repeat. By holding something like a 6" metal rule or an engineer's square along the base of the saddle and holding it up to the light you can see if you are starting to sand it into a concave or convex curve.
You can usually remove the saddle of an acoustic guitar by slackening the strings quite a lot and lifting them down at the bridge. You can place a capo down near the nut to reduce the amount that the strings will unwind off the tuner posts as you loosen them, and to raise them all at once close to the bridge I use a piece of rubber long enough to span the width of the guitar and tall enough to raise the strings enough to lift the saddles out.
If you were closer to where I live and I wasn't working 6 nights a week at the moment I would have offered to do it for you.
And @BigPaulie makes a good point. It all depends on how handy you are. My Dad was a Carpenter, so I've always been used to using different tools and 'having a go'. But if you do your own decorating, you could probably have a go at doing the jobs under discussion. They're a similar skill level imho.
I never considered the break angle of the saddle..... !
My YouTube Channel
My YouTube Channel
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
The saddle has been lowered and it plays a dream, like absolute butter... That was my one previous quibble with it. But £20 to shave the saddle down has transformed this completely.....
My YouTube Channel
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
Very happy with it 8)
My YouTube Channel
My YouTube Channel
I did my own in Lockdown One. It worked well but I did have loads of time and patience when I did it. Generally best to go to a pro
2mm at the 12th? I wouldn't want to go any lower. Mine is 2.48, and that gives me plenty of volume