Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused). Paul Davids tonewood video - Acoustics Discussions on The Fretboard
UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45

Paul Davids tonewood video

What's Hot
TanninTannin Frets: 4394
As promised some time ago, Paul has put his tonewood video out to go with the body shape one some weeks back.



I enjoyed it but found it a little underwhelming. I think there was more interest in the shape one, this pretty much restricts itself to two sorts of spruce and just three back and sides timbers (it really missed a cedar top). It's a great introduction, well produced and beautifully played as all Paul's videos are, but there won't be much in it that anyone here won't know already. Worth watching just the same. 

As an aside, Mrs Tannin watched it over my shoulder and that led to a little blindfold listening to my guitars  - no talking, just strum a chord and pick out a few notes on one while she had her back turned, then do the same on another. She found that there were clear differences between my half-dozen (which between them have 6 different tops, four different body types,  and six different back and sides timbers) and ... who knows? She might even see her way clear to seeing that I really need a Sitka Spruce and Blackwood 808 to go with them. 

(Maybe.)

(Don't hold your breath.)

(But you never know.)

0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter

Comments

  • TheMadMickTheMadMick Frets: 213
    I watched this and thought to myself - have they taken into account the different construction of various guitars. How would that interact with the various tonewoods? Would one tonewood react better to one method and more poorly to another? To many variables methinks.

    I ask, 'cos I have tried Eastman guitars and I've been completely underwhelmed although many others seem to love them.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • chrisTchrisT Frets: 10
    I think there’s perhaps a promotional aspect to Paul’s vid.
    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • guitarjack66guitarjack66 Frets: 1397
    chrisT said:
    I think there’s perhaps a promotional aspect to Paul’s vid.
    Yes,I thought this too. Featuring only Eastmans and focusing on the sound is not a true reflection of all brands using the same styles(video number one of the series) and woods(video number two.)
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • droflufdrofluf Frets: 3144
    I watched this and thought to myself - have they taken into account the different construction of various guitars. How would that interact with the various tonewoods? Would one tonewood react better to one method and more poorly to another? To many variables methinks.

    I ask, 'cos I have tried Eastman guitars and I've been completely underwhelmed although many others seem to love them.
    I suspect the construction is important if not more so than the choice of wood. There’s a similar ongoing debate over the merits of carbon vs. steel vs. Aluminium as a frame material with one side saying that aluminium gives a harsh ride compared to say carbon whilst the other side will give examples of uncomfortable carbon bikes. 

    It’s a similar dynamic here with the added variable that no two pieces of, for example, will identical. It’s the skill of the builder to bring out the best in the materials that they’re working with. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • TanninTannin Frets: 4394
    chrisT said:
    I think there’s perhaps a promotional aspect to Paul’s vid.
    Yes,I thought this too. Featuring only Eastmans and focusing on the sound is not a true reflection of all brands using the same styles(video number one of the series) and woods(video number two.)
    Not as such. In the first video I think Paul says upfront that he's gone with Eastman because Eastman was able to provide one guitar of each body shape in (almost) the same tonewoods. Not many companies could do that.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • BillDLBillDL Frets: 5615
    edited April 2022
    I liked some of Pepijn 't Hart's descriptions of the typical sounds and tones commonly produced by the different wood types.  He's very fluent and is obviously well used to discussing this kind of topic in depth given that he's Eastwood's (sorry, watched Clint in "Unforgiven" last night) Eastman's Global Production Manager, but I found some of his metaphorical descriptions quite refreshing.

    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • guitarjack66guitarjack66 Frets: 1397
    Tannin said:
    chrisT said:
    I think there’s perhaps a promotional aspect to Paul’s vid.
    Yes,I thought this too. Featuring only Eastmans and focusing on the sound is not a true reflection of all brands using the same styles(video number one of the series) and woods(video number two.)
    Not as such. In the first video I think Paul says upfront that he's gone with Eastman because Eastman was able to provide one guitar of each body shape in (almost) the same tonewoods. Not many companies could do that.
    Do you believe other brands would sound the same as Eastman guitars with the same wood?
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.