Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
When I was out guitar hunting a tele… I played one as I am after a smaller bodied acoustic too and it was the absolute standout acoustic among some very expensive alternatives. It was lively but not too small sounding, great for flat and fingerpicking. I don't recollect the neck being small. Woukd be ideal studio acoustic IMO,
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
I have an OM10 that I got in 1999 and would never part with it. Build is easily on a par with any of my Martins etc. and it has a slightly different voice to any other OM size guitar I have, best described as modern but smooth, without the over bright elements that can lead to harshness. I am not sure how much Larrivee have messed about with the build and bracing since then but knowing the ethos of the company they will only chase excellence.
One distinctive feature of the OM10 and an L-09 I have, is a slightly flatter radius to the board along with the 45mm nut making it a very different playing experience ,in the case of the OM in particular, to my other OM's ( Martin, Collings, Bourgeois etc. ). They may have revised that feature to fit in with traditional expectations ( I really hope not TBH ).
Related to the Larrivee side of the equation, if you get a chance to check out a Northwood ( build by John McQuarrie, trained by and worked for Larrivee in Canada ), please do so. They are different again, with a touch of the Larrivee DNA in there.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.