Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I've had a Cordoba C10 (full size). Nice competent guitar but it didn't blow me away.
What are the main things you are looking for in a parlour as opposed to full-size classicals, Smaller body, shorter scale length fretboard (than the standard classical 650mm), narrower nut width (than standard 52mm), slightly radiused as opposed to standard flat classical fretboard?
The are a lot of options out there depending on what you are looking for.
I was lucky enough to pick up a professionally repaired Kenny Hill Torres replica from his US-made Masters series for £1.6k. (Price new £7k). Smaller parlour body, 640mm scale length and 50mm nut width. Wonderful guitar!
Wow! Now why can't I find bargains like that?
What I'm after is a small-bodied short scale guitar, preferably with a low profile slimmer neck, which I would be comfortable with as a chuck-about guitar for noodling on the sofa, or anywhere else for that matter. I have been tending to carelessly treat my 000-18 this way, but a recent near disaster, through which the Martin thankfully survived unscathed, has shaken me up a bit. The choice of nylon-strung is just for a different flavour, as all my other guitars are steel-strung. Your comment about the Cordoba C10 being 'competent' but not blowing you away is interesting, as this was the impression I got from Youtube. That has got me decided that a grand is probably not worth paying for new. Perhaps if a used one came up at a reasonable price I might consider it, otherwise the search goes on, who knows, there might be another Kenny Hill bargain just around the corner.
Solid spruce top, sapele back and sides, nylon strings, flat fretboard, 48mm nut width, 21.5" scale length (about the same as playing a full 25.6" scale guitar with a capo on the 3rd fret) and a small body (14 frets from nut to body) - for £149 NEW!!
After seeing a Paul Brett demo on YouTube I was so curious I ordered one - and it arrived today (there are more in stock).
I can't give a full opinion until I've changed the strings round to left-handed. There is no compensation angle on the bridge saddle slot to worry about so all I need to do is change the saddle round and make a few adjustments at the nut.
The finish is understandably very basic but the build quality seems pretty good. It comes with a very nice padded gig bag. The neck has a truss rod.
Looking forward to trying it with some decent strings.
I've never quite understood parlour guitars. I've only played a handful of instruments that size, and none of them was worth picking up a second time. I should have made the effort to try others out and to get to know a nice one, I suppose, but first impressions have stuck and I don't even think about trying them out anymore, just assume that they will be awful and walk on past.
I know that can't be entirely true because there are people I respect who like them. There must be good ones out there. I suspect that it boils down to this oversimplified rule: any fool can make a half-decent dreadnought; any competent maker can make a good grand auditorium; it takes skill to get a good result in a concert size; and genius to succeed with a parlour.
That's a big generalisation to make on slim evidence, but let's throw in the modern rash of "baby" guitars, which are shaped more like a standard steel string but have the size of a parlour. Again, I've only played a handful, and again they were all pretty awful except for a baby Taylor which was nothing special but at least a lot better than I expected.
So, pending further evidence, I'm led to the view that small guitars are mostly not worth tuppence. The term "thin and boxy" was probably invented especially for them. There must be some good ones somewhere, but they seem to be very rare.
Anyway, if I was looking for something nice with nylon strings, I'd go directly to a standard size classical (or flamenco, or crossover, whatever - but in the standard size). It's not as if an ordinary classical guitar is difficult to get your arm around or play on the sofa, it's nothing like a big dreadnought, let alone a jumbo. Given that it seems to be very hard to make a nice parlour, wouldn't it be reasonable to expect, for the same money, a better quality instrument in the standard size?
The sound when played right-handed seemed surprisingly full but the jury is out until I give it a full run-through when it has been restrung left-handed. At just £149 I was intrigued so I thought it was worth a punt.
Here's a link to the Paul Brett video of this particular model : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Edg_AHibYxE
I ended up buying a LTD nylon crossover. Which is nice, but not perfect.
https://www.instagram.com/insta.guitarstuff/
Apart from that, it plays and sounds great, punching far above its weight in price.
Does it sound "thin and boxy"? The term parlour guitar comes from the original intention of playing them in a parlour or living room for the amusement of yourself or a small group. What some people call thin and boxy ,others might call "reserved and refined". Personally, I find many large bodied guitars unbalanced and boomy. It depends on what you want.
I'd like to try it with fluorocarbon trebles which I think would work well - although the sound is pretty nicely balanced as it is.