Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused). N(C)GD - Acoustics Discussions on The Fretboard
UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45

N(C)GD

brojanglesbrojangles Frets: 338
edited September 2020 in Acoustics
Recently I got a bee in my bonnet about wanting to play the prelude from the first Bach cello suite and decided to get a classical guitar which could also double for sofa-noodling duties. I looked at Alhambras, the Taylor Academy crosssover nylon - a fun little guitar, but I didn't think the sound of it would go the distance - and an ancient 7/8-sized Giannini, which sounded great and had Brazilian bossa nova cred but also some alarming warping on the neck. I thought too about the Yamaha transacoustic with the crazy built-in reverb, but in the end decided it was gimmickry and would spoil the Zen-like purity of a traditional Spanish-style guitar.

I ended up taking a punt on a late 70s/early 80s Yamaha G-250S, a guitar that was near the top of their line back then and cost the equivalent of about £1300 when new. My thinking was influenced by this blog post and also by the fact that I could get it for considerably less than the price of, say, an Alhambra 4P. It showed up two days ago:



And I've got to say I'm really pleased with it. I don't know from wood (or photography) but the top seems to be a really nice bit of spruce: 




The back and sides are laminated but made with some classy-looking rosewood: 




More important, the neck is straight, it plays well and it sounds really good, with a decent amount of bass and a decent dynamic range. I'd spent a lot of time obsessing about sizes and nut widths, but in practice a full-sized classical still feels pleasingly small and sofa-friendly if you're used to a dreadnought, and the two-inch nut just feels right for this kind of guitar: it's not like you're going to be flatpicking bluegrass numbers on it, and I have a dread if I want to do that. So I reckon it was 200 quid well spent, and I'm already 16 bars into BWV 1007 (with a right-hand technique that would make a classical teacher throw up, but whatever, it's making me happy).
0reaction image LOL 1reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter

Comments

  • Excellent! :-) 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • GTCGTC Frets: 241
    Congratulations - it looks a really nice guitar and a bargain at the price
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • GTCGTC Frets: 241
    I've just read the blog post mentioned - and I would strongly disagree with the opinion that cedar is an inferior, low-cost substitute for spruce as a soundboard wood. It is frequently used in classicals and acoustics where a warmer tone is sought.

    However, Cedar is more susceptible to dings than spruce, particularly an issue with thin top finishes (ask anyone who has a cedar-topped Lowden). 

    I've a couple of high-end guitars for which I specifically selected a cedar top for the tone.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • droflufdrofluf Frets: 3144
    Very nice
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • @GTC I didn't mean to spread anti-cedar propaganda! I'd been looking for a cedar-topped guitar to start with, as it happens... 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • GTCGTC Frets: 241
    @GTC I didn't mean to spread anti-cedar propaganda! I'd been looking for a cedar-topped guitar to start with, as it happens... 
    No - I didn't think you were, but the blog writer seemed to be of that opinion and I couldn't let that one go. Whatever, it looks like you've got a lovely guitar there.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • GTC said:
    @GTC I didn't mean to spread anti-cedar propaganda! I'd been looking for a cedar-topped guitar to start with, as it happens... 
    No - I didn't think you were, but the blog writer seemed to be of that opinion and I couldn't let that one go. Whatever, it looks like you've got a lovely guitar there.
    that blog writer claims cedar is inferior and often cracks, 
    I've never seen a cracked cedar top. I've seen cracked spruce ones. I'm not sure either would crack unless you mistreated them

    I'd generally choose cedar over spruce on steel and nylon guitars
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • DavidRDavidR Frets: 595
    GTC said:
    I've just read the blog post mentioned - and I would strongly disagree with the opinion that cedar is an inferior, low-cost substitute for spruce as a soundboard wood. It is frequently used in classicals and acoustics where a warmer tone is sought.

    However, Cedar is more susceptible to dings than spruce, particularly an issue with thin top finishes (ask anyone who has a cedar-topped Lowden). 

    I've a couple of high-end guitars for which I specifically selected a cedar top for the tone.
    Ditto. Cedar is widely used for the tops of classicals as an alternative to Spruce.  It's not a second rate alternative any more than a mahogany top on an acoustic would be - just different - and sometimes preferred. On classicals, Cedar has the reputation of having fewer audible harmonics in the trebles and for opening up more quickly on a new instrument but so much of this is subjective there will be varying opinions.

    Nice Yamaha. Pre-owned is always going to have dings if it's been loved and played. The lines on the back are from someone playing the instrument whilst wearing a shirt with nylon buttons. Wouldn't bother me at all but a good example of something to avoid doing! On all guitars actually. Shops hate it.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • KeefyKeefy Frets: 2064
    You can't go wrong with Yamaha build quality - enjoy!
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Toms_DadToms_Dad Frets: 166
    For the Bach, I can recommend the transcriptions by Richard Wright published by Cadenza. Some of it is used in the ABRSM syllabus. The Prelude to Suite No 1 is very nice.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • brojanglesbrojangles Frets: 338
    edited October 2020
    @Toms_Dad Thanks - will try to check it out. I already learned the first free arrangement of that prelude I found on the internet and can just about play it through. It's going to take another month or more to iron out all the squeaks and screw-ups (I've never tried to play fingerstyle seriously before this year) but it's giving me a ridiculous amount of pleasure. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Toms_DadToms_Dad Frets: 166
    It’s very addictive isn’t it? Most versions are in D major and played with a drop D tuning. The one I recommend is in C major, so if you’re up and running it may not help.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.