Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
The finish is original, as is the bridge although it has been re-glued after lifting. Our luthiers also gave the top wood some heat treatment to reduced (sic) any bellying.
The play- ability was excellent but the bellying had not necessarily been eliminated 100% - while not severe, I could still notice a small amount when I looked from the side. Is this somewhat acceptable/expected in a 40-50 year old guitar?
And something else - there was a crack in the saddle bridge running between the central four peg holes. They seemed genuinely unaware when I pointed this out and said it's something that must have happened since the bridge work was done. They're going to repair the saddle and let me know when it's done if I'm still interested in the guitar.
I really liked this guitar - it played great and sounded fabulous, but I'm a little anxious..or am I overly fretting (no pun intended) about issues that assuming they are repaired competently, aren't catastrophic?
NB - it would come with a 3 year guarantee
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
As Brize says, belly behind the bridge is fine as long as the bridge isn’t leaning forwards
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
Hmmm, I think it might've been slightly...wish I'd taken some pics now
This is in that range so no, not a bargain
As Brize said, a small belly in the top is normal and in fact desirable, but a severe one, especially if the top and the bridgeplate have buckled enough to allow the bridge to crack, is a very different thing. For the bridge to crack on the top it must be arched underneath, and it shouldn't be.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
I think I've come to the conclusion that the wise thing to do is forget this and wait for a better guitar to come along - though it did sound superb...gutted
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
A light bulb/sun burns brightest just before its death......
BTW - if anyone knows of any nice D35s for sale (other than the obvious Reverb, Ebay) it would be appreciated
However, there's a difference between an instrument being properly designed to reach that point, and one which got there by accident... one will last a long time, the other probably won't. To me, your description of the Martin is one where it's got there by accident and there isn't really a guarantee it will hold up in the future - even with a three-year warranty from the shop. Worse, if it does need more major remedial work and it then is made stable, that fantastic tone you paid for may disappear.
So I would happily buy a guitar like that *if* it was cheap enough to both allow for the cost of the work if or when it becomes necessary, and to then sell it on without loss if you don't love the result - bearing in mind that it will also have been "devalued" (yes I know that's ridiculous, but it's a fact of the vintage guitar market) if it's had something major like the top rebuilt. It would have to be very substantially cheaper than the 'going rate' for that to be true.
The problem is that sellers usually don't price old guitars with issues in that way.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
My favourite guitar of all time is my dad's D-35, bought new some time in the mid-80's. I was playing it the other day and it's getting better with age if you ask me. I've never been a massive one for the 'vintage mojo' thing but the sound and feel of this guitar is amazing.
I learned to play on it in the late 80's, and probably didn't treat it with the gentlest touch. That said, apart from a small amount of fret wear, it's been absolutely rock-solid. I'm certain that it's not even had a tweak of the truss rod in three decades. I can't think it's ever been kept in a case. It still plays with a good, low action and stays in tune better than any of my Strats. And certainly my Les Paul!
It's had no adjustments of the bridge, the tuning keys (which I'm sure are rebranded Schallers) still feel as good as new. The ebony fingerboard is black as the night sky with a lovely, almost oily feel. The spruce front, nut, and saddle have all gone the colour of strong tea but the guitar remains playing as well as the day it was made.
When I read your original post, I was wary of chipping in as I really don't know anything about acoustic guitar repairs, but knowing my dad's D as well as I do I'd be a little cautious of spending big money on one that's had this level of work.
Some nice looking guitars there. An HD28V and a Santa Cruz Pre war D are both likely to be great guitars.
Yep, both those would definitely be of interest
I visited Glenn today and came away with a terrific 1979 Martin HD28. I might do a separate NGD post with the experience of buying from Glenn -
https://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/187880/ngd-1979-martin-hd28#latest
@drofluf - there you go
Congratulations hope you enjoy it