Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I don't think I've ever heard bassists complaining that having to move horizontally on the fretboard is so fatiguing or difficult to finger that it's a problem.
Re: the 3 strings, I think I would be mostly fine with 3 since I use the highest string the least. It doesn't cause muting problems though so there wouldn't be any benefit removing it.
If I found a bass made for only 3 (so the fretboard was narrower) I'd give it a try and see! Definitely not 2 strings though, that's not enough.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
They / we don’t complain about 4 strings, we just enjoy 5s when it’s easier.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
I don't understand what you're talking about.
Already a member of that forum but really don't know what you're referring to.
It's a common view.
Even more so among bassists playing music in keys that are not friendly to open string use.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
What I mean is that when you're thinking about comparing 4 strings vs 5 string basses, technically being able to go down a string instead of down a few frets is easier but when the majority of bassists are playing 4 string basses, it's easy enough to go down frets anyway. That's what I mean by it's theoretically better; it's solving something that isn't really a problem.
Like if someone invented a machine that applies the right amount of toothpaste to your toothbrush for you - it would be technically easier than putting it on manually but no one's struggling with that anyway.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
I would have a 4 string and it would have to be a Jazz Bass.
I really can't see the point of that psychedelic 2 string bass thing or understand why anyone would bother with it.
The Volume is a Push Pull to swap between active and passive. When in passive mode the Treble Control turns into a passive tone control from the centre position downwards. It's quite clever.
I'm not a fan of those Delano pickups though. Their modern soapbars are fantastic, but their take on P and J pickups leave me cold.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
He uses it to create soundscapes where the notes come from different places in the auditorium.
It's a very unusual effect and quite interesting for unaccompanied pieces.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
Really though I still think I'd find 3 limiting, if I was playing a root note on the A string I'd have the same need for a G string as I would have a need for the D when playing the root on the E.
I suppose at the extreme end of things, 11 frets and one string is all that's needed to at least play a simple bass line.
Here's Brushy playing his One-String:
I quite like the idea of Billy Sheehan's dual output bass for every day bass playing. It has a neck pickup right up at the fretboard with its own output and a normally positioned P-style pickup going to a different output.
Not sure how he does it but to me it seems like it would be great for using the neck one to an amp or subwoofer PA as just a pure solid low end thing, almost like a sine wave synth, since the cleanest lowest tone comes from a neck pickup then the P can go to a normal bass amp to sound more like a bass guitar with all the grunt, harmonics, string noise, distortion etc.
Kind of like an alternative way of triggering a sine wave synth (or sometimes even 808 samples) from the bass guitar recording just to get the proper sub lows. I like the idea of this theoretically a lot, the thing that stops me doing it so much is that I have such inadequate sub monitoring and it's hard to judge the level of sub bass. Not only that but even if I had a great monitoring system, a lot of people listen in rooms with big bass peaks and nulls so even if it sounded perfectly balanced in a mastering studio, some people can play it back in a room that makes it overpowering (happens when listening to hiphop, sometimes the sub bass will just overpower everything on some notes).
Super deep, compressed and clean on the neck pickup, and the all drive and FX on the other, but still blended with another clean.
2 separate stacks. I had a few versions of it.
FIrst was pedals into a Hartke HA3500 head and Marshall VBC412 for high and drive and an Ashdown 400H and another Marshall VBC412 for the lows.
Then a Rack with a Bass Pod Pro and an Ampeg SVP-BSP (Sheehan sig) both giving a clean and dirty into a 5000W yamaha power amp etc
It was amazing. And weighed over 400 lb all in!
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
Ill have a look.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
Top
Ampeg SVP-BSP
Bass Pod Pro
Pod (Backup)
Yamaha P5000S
Earlier version
Ampeg BSP-SVP
Pod
Behringer Compressor
Hartke HA3500
Ashdown MAH400H
Can't find a cab photo at the moment. Or when it was pedal based rather than rack.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
What was the POD used for, was that for when you wanted a driven sound out of it you'd add that in or would you even have it running on clean tones for a more subtle amp sim?
The Guitar Pod did have all the extra bass packs in it though.
https://speakerimpedance.co.uk/?act=two_parallel&page=calculator
Best I got was a sim of an Orange bass amp turned up but it wasn't tried with a band so quite possibly wouldn't be as good in context.