Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I have also: tightened the staytrem, tightened the truss rod, fitted new tuners & string trees, and given the neck a decent polish.
- tighten the staytrem collet
- finesse position of guard and control plates.
- fit new tuners
- polish the neck
- string tree
- truss rod
- a couple of layers of cardboard under the toggle plate to raise that flush with the pickguard
- amber switch tip - HUGELY important
- nudge the placement of the rhythm pots as one is scraping just slightly on something
Still to do:Volume pot - Having played it a whole bunch it doesn't need a new volume pot, but the treble is all gone by 8 on the dial, so it does need a treble pass on the main volume control
Rolled fretboard edges. I don't understand how anyone can play on a guitar with a square fretboard.
and finally...
Mastery vs Staytrem (round #249?)
And perhaps most interestingly, I took off the Mastery bridge and tried a Staytrem with the wrong radius (9.5" bridge, 7.25" board) and it sounds much more "Jaguary" as a result. I think it's more plinky now, which seems to be the essence of the Jag sound far more than the Jazzmaster. I also think it might benefit from a drop from 11s to 10s...
Still to sort:
Trem is sticking for some reason. I hope I don't need to move the mounting holes. It might just need loosening a little.
Nut still needs to come down a bit more - nuff said.
Headstock decal, because it's not mine until it has my name on it.
I'm actually somewhat baffled with the Mastery vs Staytrem thing. I loved the ST on my Jazzmaster until I tried a Mastery. But the Mastery makes the Jag sound more like a Telecaster - almost too much sustain, which defeats the point of having a Jag.
I have a feeling this process is actually going to show me I'm much more a JM guy than a Jag guy but it's fun to do and it'll certainly be a great guitar when I'm done, which is a nice feeling. It's also why I don't understand why Nash has some many fans. They always sound great but I've never played one that felt like a good instrument - square fretboards, occasional sharp fret ends, saddle screws that dig into your hand etc. I'm pretty sure this is why the likes of Danocaster are so revered - anyone can put together a partscaster, but it's that final fine adjustment and optimising everything that makes for a really great instrument. (I am not putting myself on that level btw, but I try!)
Some pics of this fretboard:
Stupid square edges
I do like the Mastery on the JM but i've amazed myself how much I prefer the ST on the Jag
As I said in the sparkle Squier thread t'other day, I can't fathom why the cavities aren't all joined up at the very least. Maybe so you'd never see a gap if the plates weren't perfectly aligned but man it's a hassle to wire up.
(Let me know if anyone here has one spare!)
Although all the faff with the bridge reminds me of exactly why I'm never going to own a Jag.
Though I do appreciate if this was a Tele I'd have concluded the thread in early April..
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CgiCSV9NTA2/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Instagram
I haven't quite fully bonded with it, mostly because the frets are tiny, had it up for sale for a bit locally for a while. But being a partscaster in a very small market noone wants to pay anything like what I'd be happy with, so I'm keeping it. First order of business is a refret. I haven't done one before but Stewmac had a sale so now I have the right tools. I'm also going to flatten the board to 9.5" while I'm at it.
Wish me luck!