Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused). I went and played some D28s - Acoustics Discussions on The Fretboard
UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45

I went and played some D28s

What's Hot
2»

Comments

  • TimmyOTimmyO Frets: 6976
    edited June 2019
    Maybe <shifty> 
    "Congratulations on being officially the most right anyone has ever been about anything, ever." -- Noisepolluter knows the score
    1reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Any experience with Taylor guitars Tim? And if so, how do they contrast with Martin ones?

    Bye!

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • earwighoneyearwighoney Frets: 3380
    Any experience with Taylor guitars Tim? And if so, how do they contrast with Martin ones?
    Taylors - generally brighter and more modern sounding

    Martins - more emphasis on sounding woody/darker/warmer & more traditional sounding. 

    But these are generalisations and things do vary from guitar to guitar. 

    What are you after Drew? 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Any experience with Taylor guitars Tim? And if so, how do they contrast with Martin ones?
    Taylors - generally brighter and more modern sounding

    Martins - more emphasis on sounding woody/darker/warmer & more traditional sounding. 

    But these are generalisations and things do vary from guitar to guitar. 

    What are you after Drew? 
    Heh heh heh. Well I have a Taylor 810, and a darker/warmer guitar is probably where my head is at right now. Thinking about flogging the Taylor to get a Martin.

    Bye!

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Andy79Andy79 Frets: 881
    There’s still  another ‘41 at GV.......
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • earwighoneyearwighoney Frets: 3380
    edited June 2019
    Any experience with Taylor guitars Tim? And if so, how do they contrast with Martin ones?
    Taylors - generally brighter and more modern sounding

    Martins - more emphasis on sounding woody/darker/warmer & more traditional sounding. 

    But these are generalisations and things do vary from guitar to guitar. 

    What are you after Drew? 
    Heh heh heh. Well I have a Taylor 810, and a darker/warmer guitar is probably where my head is at right now. Thinking about flogging the Taylor to get a Martin.
    If you're finding the Taylor bright then it might be a good idea to shift it. 

    IMO, if you're looking for a Martin voiced guitar I'd recommend having a look at Furch.  They make left handed guitars, but you might have order one.  

    Check this video out, a Martin v Furch one

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7O0GfbeW30
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • TimmyOTimmyO Frets: 6976
    Any experience with Taylor guitars Tim? And if so, how do they contrast with Martin ones?
    Not with any of the high end ones no - I'd played a couple of lower (maybe 214/314 cutaway models) years ago and hadn't done anything for me so I never really bothered beyond that. 

    imho the Martin thing is as much about a deeper/stronger fundamental as it is about warmer/less bright - although there are many folk more familiar with them than me. 

    I'm also a total sucker for the iconic look of a J45 so I'll say try those too :-) 
    "Congratulations on being officially the most right anyone has ever been about anything, ever." -- Noisepolluter knows the score
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Cheers fellas, I think I'll go and try out some mid to high end Martin's. The 810 cost me a pretty penny. I don't hate it, it's great. But it's not exactly where I want to be.

    Bye!

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • TimmyOTimmyO Frets: 6976
    Cheers fellas, I think I'll go and try out some mid to high end Martin's. The 810 cost me a pretty penny. I don't hate it, it's great. But it's not exactly where I want to be.
    If you can take your Taylor with you and try it against a new (H)D28 Reimagined you'll know inside a minute if that's the direction you want to go 
    "Congratulations on being officially the most right anyone has ever been about anything, ever." -- Noisepolluter knows the score
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • RandallFlaggRandallFlagg Frets: 13679
    edited June 2019

    I have one of the new Reimagined HD28s. It's flawless and the aged toner looked a bit plain yellow when I bought it in November last year but with time hanging on the wall the wood is aging and grain showing through nicely now and it doesn't look so new, this will only get better as the years roll by.

    Tone wise I find the forward shifted bracing added some extra high end zing when new but that's starting to even out a bit and the sound become more balanced with time, especially with D'addario EJ17 strings fitted (I previously used Exilir nano coated)

    The 1 3/4 nut width took a little time to adjust to from a previous D28 1 11/16ths but I don't notice it now.

    I love Martin Guitars!


    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • stickyfiddlestickyfiddle Frets: 24852
    TimmyO said:
    Cheers fellas, I think I'll go and try out some mid to high end Martin's. The 810 cost me a pretty penny. I don't hate it, it's great. But it's not exactly where I want to be.
    If you can take your Taylor with you and try it against a new (H)D28 Reimagined you'll know inside a minute if that's the direction you want to go 
    Ya this. 

    FWIW I loved my old Taylor 214 (and still think that's one of the very best sub-1k options around) but once the Martin "thing" hooks you in there's no going back.
    The Assumptions - UAE party band for all your rock & soul desires
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • DaintyDainty Frets: 18
    I have the HD-28V and it is awesome...

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 4reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • KittyfriskKittyfrisk Frets: 16332
    Lewy said:

    Reimagined; Modern Deluxe: Authentic: ?

    Please preserve us all from such marketing bollocks s

    They're fantastically easy not to buy, or in fact read about, or comment on. 

    How would you rather a maker differentiates between lines with different features...colour coding? 
    I was commenting on the use of words that already have established meanings, such as 'Authentic'.
    "Authentic: of undisputed origin and not a copy; genuine."




    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • KittyfriskKittyfrisk Frets: 16332
    TimmyO said:

    Reimagined; Modern Deluxe: Authentic: ?

    Please preserve us all from such marketing bollocks :s

    How's the "Vox Phantom" ? ;-) 
    And your point is?
    I commented on a Vox Phantom organ guitar in another, completely unrelated thread.
    Nothing whatever to do with my statement, or my dislike of marketing types highjacking language.




    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • Andy79Andy79 Frets: 881
    A Harmony Sovereign isn’t really a Sovereign either. I think you’re being a tad pedantic. This could descend into chaos. 
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • KittyfriskKittyfrisk Frets: 16332
    Andy79 said:
    A Harmony Sovereign isn’t really a Sovereign either. I think you’re being a tad pedantic. This could descend into chaos. 
    And a Sovereign is a Monarch or a coin. 
    I could go on, but that was never & is not, my point.

    As you might have gathered, I get hacked off with random descriptions like "Authentic"  "historically-accurate" when not backed up by evidence/truth .
    It's my bugbear, so please don't feel obliged to correct me when I'm not factually wrong  ;)

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • LewyLewy Frets: 3795
    Andy79 said:
    A Harmony Sovereign isn’t really a Sovereign either. I think you’re being a tad pedantic. This could descend into chaos. 
    And a Sovereign is a Monarch or a coin. 
    I could go on, but that was never & is not, my point.

    As you might have gathered, I get hacked off with random descriptions like "Authentic"  "historically-accurate" when not backed up by evidence/truth .
    It's my bugbear, so please don't feel obliged to correct me when I'm not factually wrong  ;)

    You’re being very selective with the bits of the definition you’re choosing to quote, because Authentic is also defined as “Made or done in the traditional or original way, or in a way that faithfully resembles an original”. Which is what these guitars are.

    In answer to the point about being backed up by evidence/truth, Martin took real examples of each type from their museum and had them CAT scanned at the Smithsonian so they could replicate them in the custom shop. So, I’m not sure where you’re factually right on this one really....

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 3reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • TimmyOTimmyO Frets: 6976
    @markj  - bump for you re Martins 
    "Congratulations on being officially the most right anyone has ever been about anything, ever." -- Noisepolluter knows the score
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.