Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Given that my favourite acoustic guitar of all time is a Gibson Dove, which has maple back, sides and neck, it's a clear No from me... the fingerboard and bridge are rosewood but I wouldn't be in the least bothered if it was something different, if equivalent in feel and roughly in appearance.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
I agree with your stated position on endangered woods vs tone. So how come everyone else is so reticent to talk here?
Just asking... no agenda/ subtext/ bias.
PS I really,really love nicely figured woods, just wondering if they are really needed???
http://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/2126665/#Comment_2126665
To other members, please do not add further to this discussion, but refer any related comments to
http://www.thefretboard.co.uk/discussion/comment/2126665/#Comment_2126665
Thanks for the heads up.