Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Hi all,
I just saw this at Coda. I own one, bought new last year from GG, and the guy there also said they weren't particularly popular instruments. I wonder wy that is? I absolutely love mine and have gigged it with great results.
Just a random thought for those in-the-know.
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
That's not to say it's not a good guitar - it may well be.
But these days there are loads of aftermarket pickups from the likes of LR Baggs that make onboard electrics a little redundant on higher-end guitars, and I think most have gone back to more trad designs - I've seen D18/28/35s pretty much everywhere in the last few years. They're classics for a reason.
Might be interested with a 1 11/16" nut, but not with 1 3/4".
That Aura thing puts me off as well. If I'm going to have digital technology, I'd rather have it externally. If you are buying a guitar at this price, you want it to be for life. You don't really want digital trickery that will be completely obsolete and unfixable in 10 or 12 years time.
I left Coda with a different acoustic.
I cant remember anything distinctive about it to be honest. Not to say that someone else wouldn't love it.
I dont get the school of thought that a Martin has to look like a Martin. Surely how it plays and sounds are the two most import aspects?
As Gibson & Fender repeatedly find - non-traditional designs from ‘heritage’ brands, tend not to do too well - regardless of whether the actual instrument is any good.