Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
People do this for either of the first two reasons you mention. Not sure it achieves your third proposition, a big part of the feel of a 12 fret is due to the corresponding bridge position.
Haven't looked into the acoustics section for a while, so resurrecting a slightly older discussion, but it's not purely the bracing.
I don't know if it's in the current line up, but when I was looking at good acoustics several years ago, I played the slot headstock 12 fret Martin HD28VS, and also the 14 fret HD28V. They both have the vintage style bracing, but they do sound different. I had a 12 fret Furch Dreadnought for a while as well. That had a different tone to the 14 fret version. To me, if you are looking at dreadnoughts, the 12 fret sounds a bit more open, and doesn't have the big (overwhelming??) bottom end that a 14 fret guitar has.
The latest Martin D18s and D28s have gone back to what they call "forward-shifted" bracing - basically pre-war spec. As far as I know, they changed the bracing (on dreadnoughts at least) in the mid 1940s. I'd agree that the tone is better with the "forward-shifted" bracing. To me that makes a bigger difference than scalloping it. An HD28V (forward-shifted and scalloped) sounds a lot better than the older HD28 which was scalloped but post war positioning. I'm not sure what the spec is on the latest HD28.
They changed the D18 a few years ago (2012?). Not sure if it was scalloped, but forward shifted at least.
Hope that helps
My Trading Feedback | You Bring The Band
Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after you