Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I WILL check those out, believe me.. even if it's in 6 months time or whenever..
My YouTube Channel
The thing to remember is that whilst flatpicking is alternate picking, the pick direction is tied to the beat, not to economy of motion. That’s how it gets it’s drive. So a lot of the Troy Grady stuff doesn’t apply. I also don’t think I’ve ever heard Troy talk about tone, and getting good acoustic tone is a huge obsession for flatpickers, to the point where if something is easier to execute one way than another, but the easier way gives a lesser tone, they’ll choose the harder way.
He’s had David Grier on Masters of Mechanics but I haven’t watched it as I don’t subscribe.
My YouTube Channel
There's also a Tony Rice Homespun book/cd and an old Richard Thompson homespun book which features a flat picked Poppy Leaf Hornpipe and The Rakish Paddy.
Simon Mayor's book on Celtic Mandolin is very good too and is where I learned to play St Anne's Reel (There are several versions in the book to choose from).
And thanks for the tutorial tips.
1; I think I'd rather know where I stand - ability wise that is rather than deluding myself, that way I can go away and try and do something about it. I know many deluded musicians - one, a relation had music lessons when he was at school, and so thinks hes a musician. He can read music and knows theory to a fairly good degree - thats the academic side of things - but he's got a BASIC sense of rhythm AND pitch which would be ok if he played a fretted instrument - NO he plays the violin - badly - you've gotta 'make' the note on a violin - it really is woeful listening to him, painful even. He plays with other similarly talented people - and they actually perform - do gigs 'n stuff. He cant sit and jam with 'conventional' players playing ANY of the normal styles so, guess what, he says it's 'Improv' and he actually says it's 'jazz improv'!. Lots of simple quirky arrangements of scales which sound like it's looking for a film to be the incidental music too, he's simply - deluded.
2: the vid's above ao of players at the top of their game, but you'll notice that none of them are playing 'fast' - if you do a bpm you'll find theyre playing at approx dance rhythm - what makes it sound 'fast' it all the 'fills' and ornamentation their throwing in there - it's what you do to put u'r stamp on a piece. Go get 'the dots' of the basic tuned find ou tthe correct dance rhythm in bpm's and play the 'bare' tunes - in a while once u've got that down - add u'r own fills / runs.
Oh the fingerstyle humor thing - playing (all the bits ) of a pop or quirkier tune is clever (and technically involved ) - that's what is being displayed - but not funny.
David Grier is making little (musical) innuendos and nods to other tunes / styles within what on the surface appears to be a straight forward bluegrass tune - at dance tempo - intelligent and funny.
As for tempo - AG is bang on, they're not actually that fast. Bluegrass can be very fast but not all flatpicking is bluegrass. What is the culture shock when looking at the style for the first time is the constant churn of notes - that feels like speed but actually it's stamina and you develop it in different ways - with the added benefit that speed becomes a by-product. For what it's worth @TheOtherDennis I can't play any other kind of "fast" music. There's something about the division of labour between left and right hands, and the extensive use of open positions that makes this more accessible for me. Still been a good few years getting to the point where I'd do it on a gig though.
I also take the points about learning music, as in learning where the notes are on the fretboard, how they relate to each other and what they mean. Now that I see the full Happy Birthday story I completely get it and withdraw what I said before about that one, because it's the perfect example of wanting to run before you can walk, which I should have realised.
Just for some context, I'm not trying to be a writer or creator, I'm happy to find some tunes that I want to learn and leave it at that, I don't really have enough time to put into practicing for that level of knowledge and stuff. Maybe in time I'll get to be at a stage where I can put in enough work to get to improvising level, but I have no great aspirations for that, Where I've posted in other threads about not being able to do stuff, I'm just getting frustrated at my lack of ability to play something without making a mistake, no matter how many times I go through it. I always fluff something, and usually it's a different bit of the tune each time, which is why I get so frustrated with myself and wind up going long periods without touching the guitar at all.
Anyway, I'll move on now, because it feels like I'm starting to hijack the thread, which isn't my intention at all, and apologies if that's how it comes across.
I identify a lot with what you are saying about not having enough time to practice versus aspirations. I think in the internet age musicians are under a lot of pressure to be polymaths when in truth some of the greatest contributors to the musical world have just had a few distinct things that they did, and in many cases they are things that just came quite naturally to them. They usually then worked very hard to develop and refine but basically the foundation was something that came from them rather than this process of chop acquisition and style hoarding that we all seem to try and do nowadays.
Regarding frustration, I've made the most progress in recent years by deciding to just go around roadblocks rather than spend a lot of precious practice time trying to break through them. If I'm struggling with something, I see if I can find a different way to do it - a different position on the neck, a tweak to the melody that makes it fall better under the fingers, a different picking approach, whatever - and if that doesn't work I move on to something else and make a mental note to come back to that thing in the future. I'd say 7 times out of 10 when I do come back to it, something else has developed in my playing that either gives me a new perspective on the original problem or has just made me more capable of tackling it. Occasionally I even find myself thinking "hmm...why on earth was I so desperate to learn this in the first place?"
Personally I believe that we can't always prescribe everything about the musician we're capable of becoming. Sometimes we have to just get out of the way and let our inner musician emerge. That sounds beyond wanky but I can trace most of the things I like about my playing these days to adopting that philosophy....
Oh, and I couldn't agree more about the way people play rock 'n roll. Same with soul and (proper) r 'n b. Even Mustang Sally is bearable when played with the right groove at the right tempo.
Would you recommend the Artistworks course with Bryan Sutton for beginners? I mean I’ve been playing on and off for around 18 months but I’d still put myself in that beginner camp especially as a lot of that time I’ve not been playing acoustic.
You can get a year for about 210 USD - do you think you could advance enough in a year from beginner level to make it worth the outlay or is it really aimed at those with a much higher level of fundamental ability?
One caveat - it's not a general acoustic guitar school. It's flatpicking and bluegrass. You can apply the style to any genre, and Bryan is pretty open about people submitting tunes in VEs that are outside of bluegrass/old time, but it is all about flatpicking (so no fingerpicking tuition) and the repertoire used for the syllabuses (basic, intermediate and advanced) is all bluegrass. So you if you want to learn a more broad repertoire as a beginner, you won't get that from this.