Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused). Blocking a Floyd Rose - Guitar Discussions on The Fretboard
UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45

Blocking a Floyd Rose

What's Hot
horsehorse Frets: 1502
If you block a Floyd Rose with a bit of wood, can you get away with undoing the locking nut and just using the tuners on the headstock?
0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter

Comments

  • In my experience this has never worked for me. The nut isn't designed to work like that. I would still lock it down and use the fine tuners.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 4reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • horsehorse Frets: 1502
    In my experience this has never worked for me. The nut isn't designed to work like that. I would still lock it down and use the fine tuners.
     That's what I'd wondered thanks. The issue is one of the fine tuners is wonky / threaded. Might need to look at replacement options (it's a Yamaha so not sure whether other trems would fit the posts or not)
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • AlvinAlvin Frets: 372
    Yes , works for me no problem , i often leave the locking nuts off with no issues .
       But you will need straight string pull .  A back angled headstock also helps.

      But it will be guitar dependent , you will probably have issues if the strings go at an angle past the nut to the tuners as the will try and creep up the v slots in the nut .   You may be able to get over that by getting the string retainer bar lower  (be carefull not to screw to far , tiny metal  washers on the top could help??? ) .
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • FunkfingersFunkfingers Frets: 13312
    edited September 2023
    horse said:
    it's a Yamaha
    Much depends on whether the headstock face runs parallel to the fingerboard or is pitched back, has straight string pull towards the tuners or splaying at assorted angles. 

    A Jackson/Charvel droopy/pointy headstock is both pitched back and splays the strings at angles that are bound to introduce snagging.


    If you were to intentionally leave the string clamp blocks untightened, they will rattle. More significantly, the fine tuners become a new source of instability. Now, adjusting one alters the tension on the other five, just like any basic fulcrum vibrato.

    My preferred method for fixing a double locking vibrato system is the Tremol-No device. Tighten every lock screw on the contraption as tightly as you dare and it just might stabilise the Floyd.

    Finally, over the years, Yamaha has produced several in-house FR derivative vibrato designs. These sometimes deviate considerably from the FR Original design. Hence, some "industry standard" aftermarket parts might not fit.
    Be seeing you.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • DefaultMDefaultM Frets: 6724
    edited September 2023
    Works fine on Ibanez. I took the pads off and swapped for Sperzel locking tuners so I can change strings quick. Done the same on another Ibanez and left the regular gotoh tuners on and it's just as good.
    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 0reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
  • horse said:
    it's a Yamaha
    Much depends on whether the headstock face runs parallel to the fingerboard or is pitched back, has straight string pull towards the tuners or splaying at assorted angles. 

    A Jackson/Charvel droopy/pointy headstock is both pitched back and splays the strings at angles that are bound to introduce snagging.
    This is the reason I can't live with the model 1 or model 1a Charvels; a recipe for tuning instability.
    My trading feedback

    is it crazy how saying sentences backwards creates backwards sentences saying how crazy it is?

    0reaction image LOL 0reaction image Wow! 1reaction image Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.